Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urol Int ; 73(3): 262-5, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15539848

RESUMEN

AIM: To understand the risk factors associated with the incidence of bladder neck stenosis (BNS) after transurethral prostate surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 900 patients who underwent transurethral prostate surgery over a 4-year period. The mean age of the men was 72.3 (47-94) years. The specific outcome data assessed related to BNS, including type of operation performed, resected tissue weight and history of previous surgery in the lower urinary tract. RESULTS: 29 (3.4%) patients developed BNS at a mean of 10.3 (3-33) months, with a mean resected prostatic tissue weight of 11+/-3.7 g. Four of the 29 patients with BNS were treated with bladder neck resection and re-stenosed. Fifty-four men underwent bladder neck incision for small prostates with a high bladder neck, measured by digital rectal examination and assessed cystoscopically, with no BNS. All the remaining patients from our series did not have a BNS, with a mean resected weight of 28+/-8.9 g, which is statistically greater than in the BNS group (p<0.05, unpaired t test). CONCLUSIONS: BNS after transurethral prostate surgery is a significant problem. It is clear from our study that resection in small prostates with no sign of a high bladder neck will increase the development of BNS. Thus, small prostates should be managed by an initial bladder neck incision, even if the bladder neck is not high.


Asunto(s)
Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/etiología , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Constricción Patológica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/prevención & control
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 57(9): 773-4, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14686566

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to elicit similarities and differences in transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy regimens in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. A telephone survey of 60 centres was conducted and information collected on the operator, the anaesthesia used, antibiotic prophylaxis and number of biopsies taken. Most prostatic biopsies were performed by urologists and most procedures involved six cores. There was a marked variation in the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, and anaesthesia was used sparingly. Our survey has shown a diversity in protocols used in transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies in the UK and Ireland. It seems sensible to standardise the technique for optimal patient satisfaction, as well as clinical efficiency. A national co-ordinated, prospective trial is needed.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anestesia Local , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Irlanda , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA