Understanding the needs and preferences for cancer care among First Nations people: An integrative review.

AIM: This systematic review aimed to identify the needs and preferences for cancer care services among Australian First Nations people. DESIGN: Integrative review. DATA SOURCES: An integrative review was conducted. A wide range of search terms were used to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the searches in electronic databases. Methodological quality assessment, data extraction, was conducted independently by two reviewers, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were included. A total of 2965 Australian First Nations adults, both men and women of various ages across the lifespan, were represented; no First Nations children affected by cancer were represented in the studies. Three themes emerged which included: (1) discrimination, racism and trauma, resulting from colonization, directly impacted First National people's cancer care experience; (2) cultural ways of knowing, being and doing are fundamental to how First Nations people engage with cancer care services; and (3) First Nations people need culturally safe person-centred cancer care services that address practical needs. CONCLUSION: Most participants represented in this review experienced discrimination, racism and trauma, resulting from colonization, which directly negatively impacted Aboriginal peoples' cancer care experience. While the Optimal Cancer Pathway (OCP) was launched in Australia several years ago, people with cancer may continue to experience distressing unmet care needs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Our team includes both First Nations people, non-First Nations researchers and healthcare professionals with expertise in cancer care. The researchers employed decolonizing restorative approaches to ensure voice, respect, accountability and reciprocity in this review work. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Members of the multidisciplinary team including nurses and policymakers should reflect on these findings, ensure that they have up-to-date cultural safety training and stand together with Indigenous and non-Indigenous cancer leaders to take proactive steps to stamp out and dismantle oppression in health, and safely implement the OCP.

What are the holistic care impacts among individuals living through the COVID-19 pandemic in residential or community care settings? An integrative systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: To critically synthesise evidence in relation to the holistic care impacts (physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and environmental well-being) among individuals living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) with restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An integrative systematic review followed a pre-registered protocol and has been reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. Electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2022. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies were included. All articles were double screened according to a pre-determined eligibility criterion. The review process was managed using Covidence systematic review software. Data from the studies were extracted, methodological quality appraisal conducted, and a narrative synthesis conducted. RESULTS: 18 studies were included. The impact of restrictive practices and periods of lockdown impacted older people on all levels of individual quality-of-life. With or without COVID-19, residents experienced functional decline and many experienced malnutrition, increased incontinence, increased pain, and poorer general health and significant psychological distress. Depression increased with reduced social contact, as did anxiety and loneliness. Some residents spoke of suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: It is highly plausible that further outbreaks may prompt knee-jerk reactions from public health departments and governing bodies to continue to restrict and lockdown facilities. Public health COVID-19 outbreak policy for aged care across the globe will need to consider the benefits verses risk debate given the findings uncovered in this review. These findings showed that it is vital that policy considers quality-of-life domains not solely survival rates.

The unmet supportive care needs of people affected by cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative review.

PURPOSE: To critically synthesise evidence regarding the supportive care needs of those living with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An integrative systematic review followed a pre-registered protocol, reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines. We searched three databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, and APA PsycINFO) using keywords and included all qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies irrespective of research design published between December 2019 and February 2022. All articles were double screened according to a pre-determined eligibility criterion with reference lists of the final included studies checked for further studies. The review process was managed using Covidence systematic review software. Data from the studies were extracted, methodological quality appraisal conducted, and a narrative synthesis conducted. RESULTS: Eighteen publications were included. The findings identified that individuals affected by cancer reported a range of physical, psychological, social, and health system unmet needs during the global pandemic. Unique to the pandemic itself, there was fear of the unknown of the longer-term impact that the pandemic would have on treatment outcomes, cancer care follow-up, and clinical service delays. CONCLUSION: Many individuals living with cancer experienced unmet needs and distress throughout the different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, irrespective of cancer type, stage, and demographic factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: We recommend clinicians use these findings to identify the individual person-centred needs to optimise recovery as we transition to the post-pandemic cancer care.

Identifying the unmet supportive care needs of individuals affected by testicular cancer: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To critically appraise studies to identify experiences of unmet supportive care needs of individuals affected by testicular cancer. METHODS: A registered priori systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE were searched for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies using a wide range of search terms. All articles were double screened according to a pre-determined eligibility criterion. Reference lists of the final included studies were checked for further eligible studies. The review process was managed using Covidence systematic review software. Data from the studies were extracted, methodological quality appraisal conducted, and a narrative synthesis conducted. RESULTS: Of the 72 papers identified, 36 studies were included. In descending order of frequency of need, psychological needs were identified in 26/36, physical needs 18/36, interpersonal/intimacy needs 19/36, health system/information needs 11/36, cognitive needs 9/36, social needs 7/36, and of equal frequencies counts of 4/36 for family, practical, and patient-clinician information needs. Only one study explored spiritual needs and no daily living needs were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of needs varied in terms of frequency and distress which were commonly influenced by the age of the individual across the cancer care continuum persisting after 1-year post-treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: When caring for individuals affected by testicular cancer, clinicians are encouraged to take a holistic lens to cancer care, particularly to explore issue or concerns that young men affected by testicular cancer might be embarrassed or reticent to discuss.

How does Integrative Oncology Influence Patients' Physical and Psychosocial Outcomes, and What are Patients, Carers and Healthcare Professionals' Experiences? An Integrative Review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the relationship between integrative oncology (IO) services on patients' physical and psychosocial outcomes and to explore the experiences of IO among patients, carers and healthcare professionals. DATA SOURCES: This integrative review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. A search architecture was developed using key words and the following databases were searched: Medline (OVID), EmCare for Nurses (OVID), PsycINFO (OVID); AMED (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), Pubmed, the Cochrane Library (CCRT and CDSR) controlled trials databases and ANZ CTR. All articles were assessed according to a pre-determined selection criterion. 426 articles were assessed and 18 were included (4 qualitative, 9 quantitative and 5 mixed methods). CONCLUSION: Patients reported a reduction in some cancer related symptoms and treatment related side effects. Positive psychosocial impacts were reported such as an increased ability to cope with their cancer diagnosis and treatment. The experiences of healthcare professionals highlighted the importance of a collaborative approach among the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT), ongoing education and research to ensure Complementary Integrative Therapies (CIT) were evidence-based. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The provision of IO impacts positively on patients' self-reported physical and emotional wellbeing and quality of life at all stages of their cancer experience. Patients reported that IO supported their engagement in their own health and wellbeing by increasing feelings of control and empowerment. However, to successfully integrate CIT with conventional cancer treatments it is imperative that cancer centres adopt a collaborative and evidence-based informed approach to CIT.

An Exploration of the Rs of Radiobiology in Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the four Rs of radiobiology (Repair, Reoxygenation, Reassortment, and Repopulation) as a means to understand the effects of ionising radiation on biological tissue and subsequently as the basis for conventional fractionated treatment schedules. These radiobiological principles will form a rationale for combined regimens in prostate cancer treatment involving androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy and the associated toxicities of this approach will be discussed. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases including CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, professional websites, books and grey literature were searched using Google Scholar. CONCLUSION: It is important for nurses to understand the four Rs of radiobiology to grasp the effects of ionising radiation on biological tissue as the basis for conventional fractionated treatment schedules in prostate cancer. Men can experience a sequalae of physical and psychological side effects of treatment that can negatively impact quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Men can experience a range of unmet supportive care needs particularly related to informational, sexual, and psychological needs. For men affected by prostate cancer opting for radiation therapy (+/-) androgen deprivation therapy, nurses should ask targeted questions based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events related to urinary and bowel function, potency and fatigue, and sexual health. We also recommend the use of holistic needs assessments to tailor self-management care plans. Evidence-based self-management advice should be provided in response to each man's unique needs.

Developing the Medication Change Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: People who seek non-pharmaceutical interventions are often motivated by a desire to avoid or reduce orthodox medication. Effectiveness research in these areas needs to measure change in medication as an outcome. We set out to develop a data collection tool that is sensitive to changes in individual drug use over time. METHOD: A multi-disciplinary team designed, piloted, and revised the Medication Change Questionnaire (MCQ) on two occasions, and used qualitative interviews to understand the patient's perspective and ensure that the final product accurately reflected the medication that patients were taking. Thirty patients in one general practice completed the questionnaire on two occasions and a purposive sample of 14 were interviewed. The design sought to enable patients to record all their ingested medication accurately, both prescription and over-the-counter drugs, over a period of 7 days. It was designed to be administered face-to face on the first occasion, and to be self-completed on subsequent occasions. RESULTS: In considering in detail what medication was taken each day, the interview data fully correlated with the MCQ data in only one of the five people who were interviewed after completing the first draft of the questionnaire, but in eight of the nine people who completed the second draft. Of these eight people all but one had made some change to their medication, either by stopping or starting a drug, varying the dose of a drug or always taking one or more drugs in varying doses. The interviews demonstrated the complex and individual ways that people took their medicines, and the disparity between what was prescribed and what was actually taken. The qualitative data were also useful for reflecting on the potential advantages and disadvantages of other data collection methods, such as single medication questions and pill counts. CONCLUSION: By involving patients at every level of research, we have developed a questionnaire that enables people to record their medication use accurately over a 7-day period, and to demonstrate changes in medication over time. Further work is required to assess its acceptability by different patient populations and its feasibility in terms of completion rates over longer periods of repeated use. We believe the MCQ to be an improvement over the variety of ad-hoc tools used in the past and it is freely available from the authors.

Treating dyspepsia with acupuncture and homeopathy: reflections on a pilot study by researchers, practitioners and participants.

OBJECTIVES: For people with dyspepsia who are receiving orthodox general practice care, what is the effect on outcome and on NHS costs of adding treatment by a choice of acupuncture or homeopathy? This paper describes and reflects upon a pilot study with user involvement. DESIGN: A randomised pilot study. Patients chose between acupuncture and homeopathy and were then randomised to this preference or to the control group of normal GP care. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty people with dyspepsia (>/=2 weeks) presenting in one UK general practice were recruited in consultations and by letter to those on repeat prescriptions. There were few exclusion criteria. The homeopath and the acupuncturist treated the patient individually according to their normal practice for up to 6 months. After the trial there was a focus group for participants. OUTCOME MEASURES: SF-36 health survey, Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP), and General Well-being Index (GWBI). Counts of prescriptions, consultations and referrals from practice computer records. RESULTS: No trend or significant difference between the groups for clinical outcome or NHS costs. Major costs for the 6 months, mean (S.D.) cost per patient, were general practitioner consultations pound 8 (18), prescriptions pound 64 (73), acupuncture pound 175 (52), homeopathy pound 105 (33). Participants gave insights and suggestions which will inform the full trial design. CONCLUSIONS: Reflection on the pilot study data and experience by participants, treating practitioners and researchers led to modifications in the design and a sample size calculation. How to demonstrate individual responses to treatment remains a problem.

Primary health care transformed: complementary and orthodox medicine complementing each other.

Charlotte Paterson is a general practitioner and researcher at Warwick House Medical Centre in Taunton, Somerset. This is a group practice where, since 1991, complementary practitioners have worked on a private sessional basis in the centre. This collaboration was the stimulus for an ongoing research programme into various aspects of complementary medicine and primary care, and the practice is now an NHS funded Research General Practice. Charlotte Paterson has taken a keen interest in different models of integrating complementary and orthodox medicine with the aim of making complementary medical provision equitable and accessible.

A pilot study to evaluate the effects of floatation spa treatment on patients with osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a preliminary investigation of the effects on floatation spa therapy on quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis to see if controlled trials are warranted. DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical trial. SETTING: Private floatation spa therapy centre. PATIENTS: Fourteen patients with chronic osteoarthritis of the weight-bearing joints, of whom four dropped out. INTERVENTION: Six weekly sessions of floatation spa therapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: SF36, AIMS2 and MYMOP quality-of-life questionnaires. MAIN RESULTS: All patients improved. Differences between baseline and discharge scores showed statistically significant improvement for MYMOP, but not AIMS2 or SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled trials of floatation spa therapy for patients with osteoarthritis are warranted.

Complementary practitioners as part of the primary health care team: consulting patterns, patient characteristics and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Complementary medicine is increasingly popular with patients and with GPs, although it still remains mainly in the private sector. Few data are available from the private sector about patient-consulting patterns and outcome. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe detailed consulting patterns, help-seeking behaviour and outcome of care for patients attending a group of private complementary practitioners in a single general practice surgery. METHOD: Prospective data on consulting patterns were collected from all 147 new patients attending complementary practitioners over a 12-month period. For the first 30 weeks of this period, additional information on help-seeking behaviour and outcome, as measured by the SF-36 health survey and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP), was collected by questionnaires from 46 out of the 68 new patients. The same information was collected from a systematic one-in-seven sample of GP patients. RESULTS: Patients seen by complementary practitioners did not vary significantly in sex and age from GP patients, except in the low numbers of children. Almost half the patients had been symptomatic for over a year and musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 66% of problems; but there was much variation between the therapies. The average number of visits per patient was three for osteopathy and homeopathy but eight for acupuncture and reflexology. The change in MYMOP scores after four weeks showed a statistically significant improvement in both complementary and GP patients, which was to similar degrees except that the mean change in well-being was significantly greater for complementary patients. CONCLUSION: Prospective data collection in single settings adds valuable information to a little-researched area. This study illustrates how individual each complementary therapy is in its patient characteristics, problem category and length of treatment. The particular improvement in well-being with complementary therapy requires confirmation in other studies.

Calcium-sensing receptor mutations in familial benign hypercalcemia and neonatal hyperparathyroidism.

Familial benign hypercalcemia (FBH) and neonatal hyperparathyroidism (NHPT) are disorders of calcium homeostasis that are associated with missense mutations of the calcium-sensing receptor (CaR). We have undertaken studies to characterize such CaR mutations in FBH and NHPT and to explore methods for their more rapid detection. Nine unrelated kindreds (39 affected, 32 unaffected members) with FBH and three unrelated children with sporadic NHPT were investigated for mutations in the 3,234-bp coding region of the CaR gene by DNA sequencing. Six novel heterozygous (one nonsense and five missense) mutations were identified in six of the nine FBH kindreds, and two de novo heterozygous missense mutations and one homozygous frame-shift mutation were identified in the three children with NHPT. Our results expand the phenotypes associated with CaR mutations to include sporadic NHPT. Single-stranded conformational polymorphism analysis was found to be a sensitive and specific mutational screening method that detected > 85% of these CaR gene mutations. The single-stranded conformational polymorphism identification of CaR mutations may help in the distinction of FBH from mild primary hyperparathyroidism which can be clinically difficult. Thus, the results of our study will help to supplement the clinical evaluation of some hypercalcemic patients and to elucidate further the structure-function relationships of the CaR.

Is previous hyperthyroidism still a risk factor for osteoporosis in post-menopausal women?

OBJECTIVE: Hyperthyroidism is a risk factor for osteoporosis, but the relative contributions of the episode of hyperthyroidism and thyroxine replacement for subsequent hyperthyroidism remain uncertain. In this study we have measured bone mineral density (BMD) in post-menopausal women with a previous history of hyperthyroidism, comparing those requiring thyroxine therapy with those remaining euthyroid and with an historical local control population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS: One hundred and six post-menopausal women with a previous history of hyperthyroidism. These were divided into four groups: treated with radioiodine, remaining euthyroid (group RU, n = 15); treated with radioiodine, receiving thyroxine for at least 5 years (group RT, n = 46); treated with surgery, remaining euthyroid (group SU, n = 21); treated with surgery, receiving thyroxine for at least 5 years (group ST, n = 24). There were 102 control subjects. MEASUREMENT: Forearm bone mineral density at distal and ultradistal sites as measured by single-photon absorptiometry. RESULTS: Results were expressed as 'Z-scores' i.e. number of standard deviations from the mean of a 5-year age-band from the local control population. Mean Z-scores at distal and ultradistal sites were as follows: -0.61 and -0.81 in group RU; -0.58 and -0.56 in group RT; -0.27 and -0.30 in group SU; -0.81 and -0.57 in group ST. Patients in groups RU, RT and ST but not SU had significantly lower BMD than controls. CONCLUSION: Post-menopausal women with previous hyperthyroidism treated with radioiodine have reduced BMD, whether or not receiving thyroxine. They should be targeted for densitometry and protective therapy with oestrogen should be considered. Those treated with surgery appear to be at less risk; this may be because most are diagnosed and treated whilst premenopausal. Thyroxine may have a deleterious effect in this group; longitudinal studies would provide further clarification.

Complementary practitioners as part of the primary health care team: evaluation of one model.

BACKGROUND: A four-partner, non-fundholding, urban practice with 6000 patients has since September 1991 worked closely with nine complementary practitioners working part time on a private, fee-paying basis. AIM: This study set out to describe and evaluate a model of integrating complementary practitioners into the primary health care team. METHOD: A description of the model operating in the practice was compiled. Qualitative analysis was carried out of semistructured interviews with all members of the primary health care team using the method of a cooperative enquiry. Retrospective quantitative data on patients attending complementary practitioners were also examined. RESULTS: The model allowed patients to refer themselves or be referred by a team member, encouraged communication between team members, and did not require any specific funding. After two years the model had been largely successful in preventing conflict over power, control and decision making; had maintained commitment to the idea of integrating complementary and allopathic medicine; and was self-funding. However, despite varied mechanisms set up to share knowledge and ideology, the rate of change in this area was slower than expected and referral rates were varied. The dilemma of charging patients for complementary medicine in an environment where health care is free emerged as a major concern among the doctors and practice staff. CONCLUSION: The method of cooperative inquiry allowed the whole team to gain an understanding of other viewpoints and to use the research to tackle the problems raised. This model could be adopted and used by any enthusiastic general practice.

Pneumatic reduction of intussusception using carbon dioxide.

Pneumatic reduction using air has recently become popular for the initial non-surgical management of intussusception. Since carbon dioxide (CO2) is rapidly absorbed from body surfaces, it should theoretically result in less cramping and distension following reduction. We reviewed our recent experience with the pneumatic reduction of intussusception using CO2 in 26 children. In 22 of these the intussusception was reduced (85%). There was one performation with CO2; the patient did not suffer any postoperative complications. Five additional children who had been treated unsuccessfully with barium had intussusception subsequently reduced with CO2. Following CO2 reduction, most children were fed within hours, and there were no instances of significant abdominal distension or cramping. We conclude that pneumatic reduction of intussusception using CO2 is safe and effective, and has the theoretical advantage of more rapid absorption from the gastrointestinal tract than air.

Effect of iron-folate supplementation on serum copper concentration in late pregnancy.

The effect of iron-folate supplementation on maternal serum copper concentration in late pregnancy (33 to 35 weeks gestation) was examined. In the 30 women who had taken daily iron-folate supplements since the start of the second trimester (11 to 15 weeks gestation), the median serum copper concentration was lower than that in the 27 women who had taken no supplements (p < 0.005). However, in the supplemented women the median values for serum iron concentration and blood hemoglobin concentration were higher, and the median value for serum transferrin concentration was lower, than the corresponding median values in the unsupplemented women (p < 0.001, p < 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). Further work is needed to determine whether the difference between the median values for serum copper concentration is due to a reduction in values in the women who took iron-folate, perhaps as a result of an interaction between iron and copper, or is due to an increase in values in the unsupplemented women secondary to their apparently reduced iron status.