Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed with high-dose folic acid supplementation or multivitamin supplementation in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase I study evaluated the effect of folate supplementation on the toxicity, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. It also examined two different types of vitamin supplementation and whether the extent of prior myelosuppressive therapy affected pemetrexed tolerability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received a 10-min infusion of 600 to 14,00 mg/m(2) pemetrexed every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified into cohorts by pretreatment status [lightly pretreated (LPT) or heavily pretreated (HPT)] and were supplemented with intermittent high-dose folic acid (HDFA) or with continuous daily multivitamins (MVI) containing nutritional doses of folic acid. Pemetrexed plasma pharmacokinetics were evaluated for cycle 1. RESULTS: Sixty-two HDFA patients (28 HPT and 34 LPT) were treated with 204 cycles of pemetrexed, and 43 MVI patients (20 HPT and 23 LPT) were treated with 182 cycles. Hematologic dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (5 of 105 patients), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (4 of 105 patients), and febrile neutropenia (3 of 105 patients). Nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue, vomiting, diarrhea, and nausea. Pemetrexed doses of 800 and 1,050 mg/m(2) were well tolerated when administered with vitamin supplementation to HPT and LPT patients, respectively. There were no clinically relevant differences in toxicities or pemetrexed pharmacokinetics for LPT versus HPT patients or for patients receiving HDFA versus daily MVI supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: The pemetrexed doses tolerated in this study with vitamin supplementation were significantly higher than those tolerated in earlier studies without supplementation, and toxicities were independent of the type of vitamin supplementation or prior myelosuppressive treatment. The recommended dose of pemetrexed is 1,050 mg/m(2) in LPT patients and 800 mg/m(2) in HPT patients, irrespective of the type of vitamin supplementation.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed administered every 3 weeks to advanced cancer patients with normal and impaired renal function.

PURPOSE: This phase I study was conducted to determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended doses of pemetrexed in cancer patients with normal and impaired renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received a 10-minute infusion of 150 to 600 mg/m2 of pemetrexed every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified for independent dose escalation by measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) into four cohorts ranging from > or = 80 to less than 20 mL/min. Pemetrexed plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were evaluated for the first cycle. Patients enrolled after December 1999 were supplemented with oral folic acid and intramuscular vitamin B12. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were treated with 167 cycles of pemetrexed. Hematologic dose-limiting toxicities occurred in vitamin-supplemented patients (two; 15%) and non-supplemented patients (six; 18%), and included febrile neutropenia (four patients) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two patients). Nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea, and did not correlate with renal function. Accrual was discontinued in patients with GFR less than 30 mL/min after one patient with a GFR of 19 mL/min died as a result of treatment-related toxicities. Pemetrexed plasma clearance positively correlated with GFR (r2 = 0.736), resulting in increased drug exposures in patients with impaired renal function. With vitamin supplementation, pemetrexed 600 mg/m2 was tolerated by patients with a GFR > or = 80 mL/min, whereas patients with a GFR of 40 to 79 mL/min tolerated a dose of 500 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed was well tolerated at doses of 500 mg/m2 with vitamin supplementation in patients with GFR > or = 40 mL/min. Additional studies are needed to define appropriate dosing for renally impaired patients receiving higher dose pemetrexed with vitamin supplementation.

Raf: a strategic target for therapeutic development against cancer.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway plays a critical role in transmitting proliferative signals generated by cell surface receptors and cytoplasmic signaling elements to the nucleus. Several important signaling elements of the MAPK pathway, particularly Ras and Raf, are encoded by oncogenes, and as such, their structures and functions can be modified, rendering them constitutively active. Because the MAPK pathway is dysregulated in a notable proportion of human malignancies, many of its aberrant and critical components represent strategic targets for therapeutic development against cancer. Raf, which is an essential serine/threonine kinase constituent of the MAPK pathway and a downstream effector of the central signal transduction mediator Ras, is activated in a wide range of human malignancies by aberrant signaling upstream of the protein (eg, growth factor receptors and mutant Ras) and activating mutations of the protein itself, both of which confer a proliferative advantage. Three isoforms of Raf have been identified, and therapeutics targeting Raf, including small-molecule inhibitors and antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ASON), are undergoing clinical evaluation. The outcomes of these investigations may have far-reaching implications in the management of many types of human cancer. This review outlines the structure and diverse functions of Raf, the rationale for targeting Raf as a therapeutic strategy against cancer, and the present status of various therapeutic approaches including ASONs and small molecules, particularly sorafenib (BAY 43-9006).

Regulation of c-Raf-1: therapeutic implications.

The mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) or Ras/Raf/MAPK kinase (MEK)/ERK signaling cascade is a ubiquitously expressed intracellular signaling pathway that transmits mitogenic stimuli to the nucleus through a series of sequential phosphorylation events and controls such cellular functions as proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Components of this pathway such as ras and raf are oncogenes and as such aberrancy in their encoded proteins results in malignant transformation. The MAPK pathway is dysregulated in approximately 30% of all human tumors and therefore targeting specific components of this pathway that regulate pleiotropic cellular processes using such strategies as isoprenylation inhibitors, antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotides, and inhibitors of the kinase function represent attractive therapeutic options. raf kinase, a downstream effector of ras, has been known to be functionally aberrant in various human tumors. The 3 isoforms of raf have been studied extensively, and agents targeting c-raf are presently undergoing early-phase clinical testing. The outcomes of these trials have wide-ranging clinical implications in the management of cancers. This review addresses the rationale for targeting raf, the diverse cellular functions regulated by c-raf, and the current status of various pharmacological approaches targeting c-raf.

Targeting intracellular signal transduction. A new paradigm for a brave new world of molecularly targeted therapeutics.

Significant advances in the field of molecular biology over the past decade have led to a new era in cancer therapeutics, with an explosion of rationally designed therapeutic strategies directed against selective molecular targets. The complex array of aberrant signal transduction proteins involved in carcinogenesis has been the focus of target-based anticancer agents. Inhibitors of intracellular signal transduction represent a unique approach in that they inhibit critical downstream regulatory proteins, which are vital to the process of cellular communication. Although these agents are in early-phase evaluations, the preliminary data suggest that they are well tolerated and capable of target inhibition in surrogate and tumor tissue. Although the primary therapeutic benefit of these agents is expected to be decreased tumor growth, evidence suggests that objective tumor responses may also be achieved. There are many unresolved questions pertaining to the development of this class of compounds, including selection of optimal dose and schedule, determination of relevant endpoints, methods for target validation, and strategies for combination with cytotoxic agents. However, despite the numerous unresolved issues, the emergence of this class of compounds has resulted in an undeniable impact on the present and future of cancer therapeutics.