Efficacy of a new nutraceutical formulation: L-tryptophan, probiotics, charcoal, chamomile, mint, and licorice (COLONIR®) in the improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders. IBS is characterized by recurrent chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits in the absence of organic damage. Although there are reviews and guidelines for treating IBS, the complexity and diversity of IBS presentation make treatment difficult. Treatment of IBS focuses on relieving symptoms as mild signs and symptoms can often be controlled by managing stress and by making changes in diet and lifestyle. The use of nutraceutical compounds has been advocated as a possible alternative treatment in patients with IBS. COLONIR® (Omega Pharma Srl, Milan, Italy) may be an alternative or adjuvant treatment in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of this new nutraceutical formulation in inducing symptoms remission and improve gastrointestinal habits. METHODS: An initial cohort of 1004 consecutive patients referred to 25 different Units of Internal Medicine a/o Gastroenterology in Italy to perform colonoscopy for intestinal symptoms was asked to participate. Patients were treated for 2 months with two doses of nutraceuticals/day during meals namely COLONIR®. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 2 months to evaluate the frequency and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms in the past seven days with a questionnaire based on ROMA IV criteria. RESULTS: After 2 months, 899 patients completed the follow-up. COLONIR® achieved a statistically significant reduction of severity of symptoms in the study population without any documented side effects. CONCLUSIONS: These promising results, here reported, need to be confirmed, valuating the efficacy of COLONIR® in relieving gastrointestinal symptoms in IBS patients in further studies.

Efficacy of a new nutraceutical formulation (CHETOGERD®) in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): a prospective observational study.

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is a gastrointestinal disorder that leads to symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation without visible esophageal mucosal injury, and it is treated with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). CHETOGERD® gel or orosoluble (oro) formulations-an association of natural active ingredient: hyaluronic acid, altea, malva, apple active TM, Aloe vera, L-triptophan, calcium gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, Musa paradisiaca)-may be an alternative or a coadjutant treatment in patients with NERD. The aim of the study was to evaluate, prospectively, the efficacy of CHETOGERD® gel and oro in inducing symptom's reduction or remission, in consecutive patients with NERD. Patients were divided in two groups and treated with CHETOGERD® gel or CHETOGERD® oro, 3 sachets/day for 3 months, decreased to 1 sachet/day for other 3 months. Symptoms were evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months using the reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ). Symptoms' remission was defined as reduction of retrosternal pain or burning, epigastric pain or burning, regurgitation and acid sensation in mouth. Frequency, distribution analyses and non-parametric tests were used for the statistical analysis. Results were considered statistically significant for p values < 0.05. Four hundred and twenty-three patients (M/F 240/183; mean age 50 years) were diagnosed with NERD and were consecutively enrolled. 146 patients underwent therapy with CHETOGERD® gel, while 277 were treated with CHETOGERD® oro. 108 patients from the first group and 172 patients from the second group completed follow up at 3 months, while 100 patients from each group completed follow-up at 6 months. Both formulations were able to significantly reduce the frequency and intensity of symptoms analysed with RDQ. No adverse events were reported. CHETOGERD® gel and oro are two valid alternatives to control symptoms in patients with nonerosive reflux disease.

Role of MIC levels of resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in Helicobacter pylori eradication.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole significantly affects the cure rate of standard therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection. We tested whether different MIC levels of resistance to these antibiotics play a role in therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of data from a therapeutic trial in which patients with antibiotic susceptibility testing (Etest) received first-line sequential therapy. The level of antibiotic resistance was classified according to MIC values into low (MIC from >0.5 to ≤8 for clarithromycin, and from >8 to ≤32 for metronidazole) and high (MIC from >8 to 256 mg/L for clarithromycin, and from >32 to 256 mg/L for metronidazole). RESULTS: Data from 1006 patients were included. There were 520 (51.7%) patients with susceptible strains, 136 (13.5%) with clarithromycin-resistant strains, 144 (14.3%) with metronidazole-resistant strains and 206 (20.5%) with clarithromycin-resistant and metronidazole-resistant strains. In the presence of double resistance, the cure rate was still high (38/41, 92.7%) when MIC levels were low and it was reduced (94/112, 83.9%) only when MIC levels of both antibiotics were high. The cure rates did not significantly differ between patients with single antibiotic-resistant strains, irrespective of MIC values, and those with susceptible strains. CONCLUSIONS: We found that MIC levels of resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole play a role in H. pylori therapy outcome and that bacterial resistance becomes relevant in vivo when clarithromycin-resistant and metronidazole-resistant strains have high MIC values for at least one of these antibiotics.

Efficacy of a New Nutraceutical Formulation in Patients with Symptomatic Uncomplicated Diverticular Disease (SUDD): a Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is characterized by abdominal pain, bloating and altered bowel habits (constipation or diarrhea) attributed to diverticula in the absence of macroscopic mucosal alterations. There is no consensus about management of these patients. DIVER-100®, an association of natural active ingredients may be effective in the treatment of patients with SUDD. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DIVER-100® in patients with SUDD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy of DIVER-100® in consecutive patients with SUDD, confirmed by radiology or endoscopy. All patients were treated with DIVER-100® 2 capsules/day 10 days per month, for 3 months. The primary endpoint was the clinical remission rate, defined as the reduction of abdominal pain and bloating, improvement of bowel habits and prevention of acute diverticulitis (AD). The secondary endpoint was the rate of adverse events. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were consecutively enrolled at the Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy. DIVER-100® was effective in inducing remission of symptoms in 12 patients (11.9%) at 3 months and in 10 patients (9.9%) at 6 months. DIVER-100® significantly reduced abdominal pain and bloating in 45.5% and 57.4% of patients respectively (p <0.001) after 3 months. No episodes of AD and no adverse events related to DIVER--100® were recorded at month 6 in the study population. CONCLUSIONS: DIVER-100® is a safe and effective nutraceutical compound in obtaining remission and symptom relief in SUDD patients. Further randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Antibiotic resistance pattern of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated in Italy during 2010-2016.

PURPOSE: Bacterial resistance toward the most used antibiotics is increasing in Helicobacter pylori strains worldwide. Emergence of multidrug resistance significantly affects the efficacy of standard therapy regimens. Therefore, monitoring for primary antimicrobial resistance is essential for H. pylori management in clinical practice. METHODOLOGY: H. pylori isolates obtained from patients consecutively observed in a single center were tested for primary resistance by using E-test method. Bacterial strains showing MIC values >0.5, >8 and >1 mg/L toward clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin, respectively, were considered resistant. The trend of antibiotic prevalence, either single or combined, during 2010-2016 was assessed. RESULTS: Antibiotic susceptibility data were available in 1424 (82.3%) out of 1730 tested patients. The overall resistance for all the three antibiotics showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2013 (clarithromycin: from 19% to 35.6%; metronidazole: from 33.6% to 45.3%; levofloxacin: from 19% to 29.7%; p < .001), when a plateau until 2016 was observed (clarithromycin: 35.9%; metronidazole: 40.2%; levofloxacin: 29.3%). A similar trend occurred for clarithromycin-metronidazole combined resistance rate (2010: 11.4%; 2013: 28.2%; 2016: 21.9%). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that prevalence of primary resistance in H. pylori isolates toward the most frequently used antibiotics probably reached a plateau in the last years.

Pylera and sequential therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a culture-based study in real clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Italian guideline suggests 10-day sequential or bismuth-based quadruple therapies for first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment. Comparison between these regimens is lacking. We assessed the efficacy of these therapies in clinical practice and evaluated the role of primary bacterial resistance toward clarithromycin and metronidazole. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled. Bacterial culture with antibiotics susceptibility testing was attempted in all cases. Patients received either a sequential therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg for 10 days plus amoxicillin 1000 mg for the first 5 days followed by clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg (all twice daily) for the remaining 5 days, or bismuth-based therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily and Pylera 3 tablets four times daily for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by using C-urea breath test. RESULTS: A total of 495 patients were enrolled. Following sequential (250 patients) and quadruple (245 patients) therapies, the eradication rate were 92 and 91%, respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis and 96 and 97%, respectively, at per protocol analysis. Overall, the pattern of bacterial resistance did not significantly affect the cure rate, but the presence of clarithromycin and metronidazole dual resistance tended to reduce the success rate of both sequential (84.8 vs. 90.1%; P=0.4) and quadruple (85 vs. 94.1%; P=0.06) therapies. Adverse events occurred more frequently with the quadruple than with sequential therapy (56.9 vs. 25.8%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In our country, sequential and bismuth-based quadruple therapy achieved similarly high eradication rates as first-line treatments for H. pylori infection in clinical practice.