An evaluation of onobotulinumtoxinA as a therapeutic option for pediatric neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) results in involuntary detrusor contractions during bladder filling or storage risking transmission of pressure to the upper urinary tracts and/or significant incontinence. The goals of bladder management in children with NDO prioritize the preservation of renal function, prevention of UTIs, and optimizing quality of life. First-line measures include intermittent catheterization and anticholinergic medication. However, when conservative measures fail, surgical intervention may be indicated. Historically, the next step was major reconstructive surgery to create a low-pressure urinary reservoir. The introduction of intravesical botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) for use in children in 2002 offered a less invasive option for management. However, its exact role is still evolving. AREAS COVERED: This article summarizes the mechanism of action of BoNT/A for management of NDO and evaluates the current literature defining common practice and clinical efficacy in children with NDO. The findings of the recently completed phase III trial for intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA in children are discussed in detail. EXPERT OPINION: As the first BoNT/A approved for use in children with NDO, onabotulinumtoxinA appears to be a safe and less invasive alternative to major reconstructive surgery. However, data defining appropriate patient selection and its role as a long-term treatment option continue to develop.

Understanding factors influencing primary treatment with intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA versus augmentation cystoplasty in patients with spina bifida.

PURPOSE: Surgical interventions in the urologic management of children with neurogenic bladder secondary to spina bifida aim to preserve upper tract function, prevent urinary tract infections, and optimize quality of life. However, since the introduction of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) in the management of these patients, the indications for choosing Botox over augmentation cystoplasty (AC) remain undefined. The objective of this study was to determine which factors lead patients to undergo Botox versus AC as a primary surgical treatment after failing medical management. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of pediatric patients with myelomeningocele undergoing either primary Botox or primary AC at our institution between 2013 and 2018. We recorded demographic and clinical information. We identified 10 important clinical decision-making factors: bladder trabeculation, vesicoureteral reflux, or hydronephrosis on imaging; end-filling pressure (EFP) ≥40 cm H2O, detrusor overactivity, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, or reduced capacity on urodynamic studies; physician-perceived bladder hostility; and patient/family desire for continence and independence. The presence of these factors was compared between patients undergoing either primary Botox or primary AC. RESULTS: We identified 14 and 50 myelomeningocele patients who underwent primary AC and primary Botox, respectively. We found no significant differences in age, sex, race, or history of reconstructive surgery (antegrade continence enema or catheterizable channel). For the 10 decision-making factors, desire for independence/continence (p = <0.001) and reduced capacity (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with AC, while trabeculation (p = 0.006), EFP ≥40 cm H2O (p = 0.029), rising slope (p = 0.019), and physician-perceived hostility (p = 0.012) were significantly more common with Botox. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, quality of life measures prompted AC over objective urodynamic or imaging findings before attempting Botox. These findings support a shared decision-making approach when considering surgical intervention for neurogenic bladder secondary to myelomeningocele.