RESUMEN
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is currently threatening the health of individuals worldwide. We compared the clinical characteristics between younger patients (aged <60 years) and older patients (aged ≥60 years) with COVID-19, detected the risk factors associated with a prolonged hospital stay, and examined the treatments commonly used with a particular focus on antiviral therapies. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the West Campus, Union Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China). The sample consisted of 123 patients admitted to the hospital between 9th February, 2020, and 3rd March, 2020. The data related to the demographics, laboratory findings, and treatment were analyzed to identify discrepancies between younger and older patients and those with and without primary diseases. The risk factors that contribute to a prolonged hospital stay were subsequently identified. Results: Patients aged ≥60 years required longer hospital stay than younger patients (P=0.001). The percentage of lymphocytes was significantly lower in older patients and those with primary diseases (P=0.016 and P=0.042, respectively). The findings revealed that the risk factors that contributed to the length of hospital stay were age, the number of days of illness before hospitalization, white blood cell (WBC) count and albumin levels at admission, a neutrophil fraction at discharge, and antibiotic treatment. Analysis using a model that consisted of the above five risk factors for predicting prolonged hospital stay (>14 days) yielded an area under the ROC (AuROC) curve of 0.716. Antiviral and antibiotic treatments were administered to 97.6% and 39.0% of patients, respectively. The antiviral drugs most commonly administered were traditional Chinese medicine (83.7%) and arbidol (75.6%). Conclusions: In this study, older patients and those with primary diseases were at a higher risk of worse clinical manifestations. The physicians who treat the patients should pay close attention to the risk factors that contribute to the length of hospital stay, which could be used for predicting prolonged hospital stay. Traditional Chinese medicine and arbidol were the most frequently used antiviral drugs. Nevertheless, the extent to which these medications can effectively treat COVID-19 warrants further investigation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+))/CD38/cyclic ADP ribose (cADPR)/Ca(2+) signaling pathway has been shown to regulate intracellular calcium homeostasis and functions in multiple inflammatory processes, its role in sepsis remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether the NAD(+)/CD38/cADPR/Ca(2+) signaling pathway is activated during sepsis and whether an inhibitor of this pathway, 8-Br-cADPR, protects the organs from sepsis-induced damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) or sham laparotomies. NAD(+), cADPR, CD38, and intracellular Ca(2+) levels were measured in the hearts, livers, and kidneys of septic rats at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after CLP surgery. Rats were also divided into sham, CLP, and CLP+8-Br-cADPR groups, and the hearts, livers, and kidneys were hematoxylin-eosin-stained and assayed for malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase activities. RESULTS: NAD(+), cADPR, CD38, and intracellular Ca(2+) levels increased in the hearts, livers, and kidneys of septic rats as early as 6-24 h after CLP surgery. Treatment with 8-Br-cADPR inhibited sepsis-induced intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization, attenuated tissue injury, reduced malondialdehyde levels, and increased superoxide dismutase activity in septic rats. CONCLUSIONS: The NAD(+)/CD38/cADPR/Ca(2+) signaling pathway was activated during sepsis in the CLP rat model. Blocking this pathway with 8-Br-cADPR protected hearts, livers, and kidneys from sepsis-induced damage.