Recovery of polyhydroxyalkanoate from activated sludge in an enhanced biological phosphorus removal bench-scale reactor.

A sequencing batch reactor was used to study the possibility of harvesting polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) from enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) processes without compromising treatment quality. Because, in EBPR, the highest PHA concentrations are observed after exposure of the sludge to anaerobic conditions, PHA accumulation was evaluated with collection of waste activated sludge (WAS) at the end of the anaerobic stage, in addition to the traditional removal after the aerobic stage. The system achieved good phosphorus removal, regardless of the point of WAS collection. When sludge was harvested at the end of the anaerobic stage, the PHA content of the sludge ranged from 7 to 16 mg PHA/100 mg mixed liquor volatile suspended solids. Although this level of PHA production is below levels obtained with pure cultures, the demonstrated ability to harvest PHA, while simultaneously satisfying phosphorus removal in an EBPR process, is a key initial step towards of the use of wastewater treatment plants for PHA production.

Comparison between direct microscopy and flow cytometry for rRNA-based quantification of Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis in activated sludge.

A comparison of the quantification of a specific microbial group in activated sludge by fluorescent in-situ hybridization, coupled with either direct microscopic counting or flow cytometry, was performed using an enhanced-biological-phosphorus-removal, sequencing-batch reactor. The population dynamics of Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis (Cand. A. phosphatis) was evaluated during two separate runs of the reactor. With the operational conditions used, Cand. A. phosphatis was enriched until a failure in the pH controller eliminated its ecological advantage. As a result, the comparison of quantification techniques included Cand. A. phosphatis concentrations as low as 11% and as high as 96% of the total cells in the samples. The analysis demonstrated that, regardless of the particular limitations of each technique, both provided similar results when the activated-sludge flocs were easily dispersed. However, when the activated-sludge samples contained flocs that were difficult to disperse, flow cytometry failed to provide quantitative results.