Resistance detected in PBMCs predicts virological rebound in HIV-1 suppressed patients switching treatment.

BACKGROUND: Genotypic resistance test (GRT) performed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) represents a chance to evaluate resistance in virologically suppressed HIV infected patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of baseline resistance detected through PBMC GRT on virological rebound after switching treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Baseline genotypic susceptibility scores (GSS) from PBMC GRT (DNA-GSS) and from previous cumulative plasma GRTs (when available, pRNA-GSS) were evaluated. Survival analysis was used to assess the probability and predictors of virological rebound (VR). RESULTS: 227 virologically suppressed patients were analysed. Twenty-four months after switching therapy, the probability of VR was 15.3%. Patients showing an intermediate or full resistant DNA-GSS had a higher probability of experiencing VR compared to those carrying a fully susceptible DNA-GSS (27.2% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.001). By multivariable Cox regression, patients with an intermediate/full resistant DNA-GSS, with a nadir CD4 count <100 cell/mm3 and with a shorter time of previous virological suppression showed a higher adjusted hazard of experiencing VR. In a sub-group of 114 patients with previous plasma GRTs available, patients with an intermediate or fully resistance showed by both GSSs (from plasma and PBMCs) had the highest probability of experiencing VR. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance detected in proviral DNA, together with a low nadir CD4 count and a short previous virological control, predicts VR after therapy switching in virologically suppressed patients. PBMC GRT can be a useful tool for tailoring treatment switch, especially if paired with information about previous cumulative resistance and previous viro-immunological history.

Improved darunavir genotypic mutation score predicting treatment response for patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B and non-subtype B receiving a salvage regimen.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to improve the prediction of the impact of HIV-1 protease mutations in different viral subtypes on virological response to darunavir. METHODS: Darunavir-containing treatment change episodes (TCEs) in patients previously failing PIs were selected from large European databases. HIV-1 subtype B-infected patients were used as the derivation dataset and HIV-1 non-B-infected patients were used as the validation dataset. The adjusted association of each mutation with week 8 HIV RNA change from baseline was analysed by linear regression. A prediction model was derived based on best subset least squares estimation with mutational weights corresponding to regression coefficients. Virological outcome prediction accuracy was compared with that from existing genotypic resistance interpretation systems (GISs) (ANRS 2013, Rega 9.1.0 and HIVdb 7.0). RESULTS: TCEs were selected from 681 subtype B-infected and 199 non-B-infected adults. Accompanying drugs were NRTIs in 87%, NNRTIs in 27% and raltegravir or maraviroc or enfuvirtide in 53%. The prediction model included weighted protease mutations, HIV RNA, CD4 and activity of accompanying drugs. The model's association with week 8 HIV RNA change in the subtype B (derivation) set was R(2) = 0.47 [average squared error (ASE) = 0.67, P < 10(-6)]; in the non-B (validation) set, ASE was 0.91. Accuracy investigated by means of area under the receiver operating characteristic curves with a binary response (above the threshold value of HIV RNA reduction) showed that our final model outperformed models with existing interpretation systems in both training and validation sets. CONCLUSIONS: A model with a new darunavir-weighted mutation score outperformed existing GISs in both B and non-B subtypes in predicting virological response to darunavir.

Study of genotypic and phenotypic HIV-1 dynamics of integrase mutations during raltegravir treatment: a refined analysis by ultra-deep 454 pyrosequencing.

BACKGROUND: The dynamics of raltegravir-resistant variants and their impact on virologic response in 23 HIV-1-infected patients, who started a salvage raltegravir-containing regimen, were investigated. METHODS: Integrase population sequencing and Ultra-Deep-454 Pyrosequencing (UDPS) were performed on plasma samples at baseline and at raltegravir failure. All integrase mutations detected at a frequency ≥1% were considered to be reliable for the UDPS analyses. Phylogenetic and phenotypic resistance analyses were also performed. RESULTS: At baseline, primary resistance mutations were not detected by both population and UDPS genotypic assays; few secondary mutations (T97A-V151I-G163R) were rarely detected and did not show any statistically association either with virologic response at 24-weeks or with the development of resistant variants at failure. At UDPS, not all resistant variants appearing early during treatment evolved as major populations during failure; only specific resistance pathways (Y143R-Q148H/R-N155H) associated with an increased rate of fitness and phenotypic resistance were selected. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance to raltegravir in integrase strand transfer inhibitor-naive patients remains today a rare event, which might be changed by future extensive use of such drugs. In our study, pathways of resistance at failure were not predicted by baseline mutations, suggesting that evolution plus stochastic selection plays a major role in the appearance of integrase-resistance mutations, whereas fitness and resistance are dominant factors acting for the late selection of resistant quasispecies.

Overcoming resistance to existing therapies in HIV-infected patients: the role of new antiretroviral drugs.

Resistance to available antiretroviral (ARV) agents is of increasing concern, and development of novel agents that address this problem has been identified as a major public health priority. As ARV resistance becomes more prevalent with extended use of existing agents, individuals with HIV infection resistant to all three traditional classes of ARVs, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs), find themselves increasingly limited with regard to effective treatment options. The need for tolerable new drug regimens that effectively suppress viral replication while being simple to adhere to is increasingly pressing. This article reviews the epidemiology of antiretroviral drug resistance, the factors that contribute to the emergence of resistance, and presents data that support the need for early detection of resistance and maximal virologic suppression in order to delay treatment failure and reduce mortality. Healthcare providers are encouraged to optimize therapy through the use of new agents from existing drug classes, which can minimize cross-resistance, as well as agents with novel mechanisms of action, in order to realize the potential for greater viral containment and to forestall development of resistance mutations. This article evaluates several emerging therapies that are in late-stage clinical development and promise to expand treatment options for highly treatment-experienced patients with the goal of improving outcomes for HIV-infected individuals whose options for sustained antiviral efficacy are increasingly limited.

Mechanisms underlying activity of antiretroviral drugs in HIV-1-infected macrophages: new therapeutic strategies.

Monocyte-derived macrophages (M/M) are considered the second cellular target of HIV-1 and a crucial virus reservoir. M/M are widely distributed in all tissues and organs, including the CNS, where they represent the most common HIV-infected cells. Differently from activated CD4+ T lymphocytes, M/M are resistant to the cytopathic effect of HIV and survive HIV infection for a long time. Moreover, HIV-1 replication in M/M is a key pathogenetic event during the course of HIV-1 infection. Overall findings strongly support the clinical relevance of anti-HIV drugs in M/M. Nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs) are more active against HIV in M/M than in CD4+ T lymphocytes. Their activity is further boosted by the presence of an additional monophosphate group (i.e., a phosphonate group, as in the case of Tenofovir), thus overcoming the bottleneck of the low phosphorylation ability of M/M. In contrast, the antiviral activity of non-NRTIs (not affecting the DNA chain elongation) in M/M is similar to that in CD4+ T lymphocytes. Protease inhibitors are the only clinically approved drugs acting at a late stage of the HIV lifecycle. They are able to interfere with HIV replication in HIV-1 chronically infected M/M, even if at concentrations greater than those observed in HIV-1 chronically infected CD4+ T lymphocytes. Finally, several new drugs have been shown to interfere efficiently with HIV replication in M/M, including entry inhibitors. A better understanding of the activity of the anti-HIV drugs in M/M may represent a key element for the design of effective anti-HIV chemotherapy.

Mannose-specific plant lectins from the Amaryllidaceae family qualify as efficient microbicides for prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection.

The plant lectins derived from Galanthus nivalis (Snowdrop) (GNA) and Hippeastrum hybrid (Amaryllis) (HHA) selectively inhibited a wide variety of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 strains and clinical (CXCR4- and CCR5-using) isolates in different cell types. They also efficiently inhibited infection of T lymphocytes by a variety of mutant virus strains. GNA and HHA markedly prevented syncytium formation between persistently infected HUT-78/HIV cells and uninfected T lymphocytes. The plant lectins did not measurably affect the antiviral activity of other clinically approved anti-HIV drugs used in the clinic when combined with these drugs. Short exposure of the lectins to cell-free virus particles or persistently HIV-infected HUT-78 cells markedly decreased HIV infectivity and increased the protective (microbicidal) activity of the plant lectins. Flow cytometric analysis and monoclonal antibody binding studies and a PCR-based assay revealed that GNA and HHA do not interfere with CD4, CXCR4, CCR5, and DC-SIGN and do not specifically bind with the membrane of uninfected cells. Instead, GNA and HHA likely interrupt the virus entry process by interfering with the virus envelope glycoprotein. HHA and GNA are odorless, colorless, and tasteless, and they are not cytotoxic, antimetabolically active, or mitogenic to human primary T lymphocytes at concentrations that exceed their antivirally active concentrations by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude. GNA and HHA proved stable at high temperature (50 degrees C) and low pH (5.0) for prolonged time periods and can be easily formulated in gel preparations for microbicidal use; they did not agglutinate human erythrocytes and were not toxic to mice when administered intravenously.

The challenge of antiretroviral-drug-resistant HIV: is there any possible clinical advantage?

Resistance to antiretroviral drugs is associated with reduced treatment options and, therefore, increased risk of disease progression or death. Despite the main goal of antiretroviral therapy should be achievement of complete suppression of HIV replication, the accumulation of resistance mutations in patients with multiple treatment failure makes this objective often difficult, or even impossible to obtain. Thus, clinicians should be aware about the complex relationship between drug pressure and viral replication capacity and about some potential advantages related to antiretroviral drug resistance. The two main biological mechanisms that can be at the origin of these clinical benefits are: reduction of viral fitness and viral hypersusceptibility. The term "fitness" indicates the ability of HIV to maintain high rate of replication capacity in presence of antiretroviral drugs. Consequently, replication capacity, high in presence of wild type virus, tends to decrease when HIV must adapt its enzymes to work in presence of drugs. A reduction of viral fitness is observed in patients harbouring mutations conferring resistance to all the three classes of antiretroviral drugs currently in use. Particularly, the effects on reduction of replication capacity related to M184V mutation in reverse transcriptase are analyzed. Viral isolates with reduced susceptibility or resistance to some antiretroviral drugs may exhibit significant increased susceptibility to other drugs acting on the same enzyme. This phenomenon is known as hypersusceptibility and can be demonstrated in vitro by phenotypic assays. Phenotypic hypersusceptibility has been demonstrated for all three drug classes. Particularly, NNRTI hypersusceptibility, associated with NRTI mutations, is analyzed and discussed.

Mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase potentially associated with hypersusceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors: effect on response to efavirenz-based therapy in an urban observational cohort.

BACKGROUND: Hypersusceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) was described in association with reverse-transcriptase (RT) mutations conferring resistance to nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). We evaluated the effect of RT mutations associated with hypersusceptibility to NNRTIs on the response to efavirenz-based therapy. METHODS: We analyzed an observational database of patients for whom highly active antiretroviral therapy failed and who received genotypic resistance testing-guided therapy, either efavirenz or protease inhibitor (PI) based. Study end points were achievement of virus load <80 copies/mL, achievement of virus load <80 copies/mL without rebound to >500 copies/mL, and changes in CD4 cell counts. RESULTS: The baseline RT mutations M41L, M184V, L210W, and T215Y and the M41L/T215Y and M41L/T215Y/M184V combinations were associated with virological suppression for efavirenz-treated patients, whereas, for PI-treated patients, only the M184V mutation was associated with virological suppression, and the L210W mutation showed a negative correlation; no correlation was found between any mutation and virological response without rebound. CONCLUSIONS: The M41L, M184V, L210W, and T215Y mutations were associated with a better, although transient, virological outcome in patients treated with efavirenz-based regimens.

Q151M-mediated multinucleoside resistance: prevalence, risk factors, and response to salvage therapy.

Among 470 patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome and/or human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV/AIDS) who underwent genotype resistance testing (GRT) after the failure of therapy, 17 (3.6%) harbored the Q151M mutation. The Q151M mutation was associated with younger age, lower CD4(+) lymphocyte count, higher HIV RNA level, and treatment with >2 pre-GRT regimens. By contrast, the Q151M mutation was inversely associated with lamivudine administration. A full reversion of the Q151M mutation was observed in 5 of 5 patients who underwent treatment interruption after GRT. The reversion was followed by a response to salvage therapy in 4 (80%) of 5 patients.

Using a database of HIV patients undergoing genotypic resistance test after HAART failure to understand the dynamics of M184V mutation.

OBJECTIVE: M184V/I mutation is associated with high-level phenotypic resistance to lamivudine (3TC). The aim of the present analysis was to correlate the time of appearance/disappearance of M184V/I with duration of 3TC treatment. METHODS: Overall, 211 patients were selected from a database of HIV patients undergoing genotypic resistance test after virological failure of HAART regimens in two major reference centres in Rome between 1999 and 2001. At the time of genotyping, 120 of them (56.9%) were failing a 3TC-including HAART, while 91 (43.1%) received 3TC only in previous HAART. Duration of the current 3TC-containing regimen and the time from the end of last 3TC treatment to genotypic resistance test (GRT) were analysed. RESULTS: Among patients currently undergoing 3TC-containing HAART, the prevalence of M184V/I was 82.5% (78.3/4.2%, respectively) and significantly associated to current 3TC use at GRT. Prevalence of M184V/I was associated to longer history of 3TC (from 47.1% in patients treated with 3TC for <6 months, to 84.0% among those treated for 7-12 months; 100.0% of patients with >42 months of current 3TC carried M184V. At logistic regression analysis, the rate of increase of M184V/I in 3TC-failing patients was statistically significant (OR: 1.066 per month of current 3TC therapy, 95% CI: 1.020-1.114, P<0.01), suggesting a 6.6% monthly increase of probability of M184V/I. Among patients who interrupted 3TC, overall prevalence of M184V/I was 23.1%: proportion of patients carrying the M184V/I dropped from 83.3% among those who interrupted 3TC from < or = 3 months, to 56.3, 20, 10.5 and 0% for those interrupting 3TC from 6, 12, 24 and > or = 24 months, respectively. At logistic regression, the rate of disappearance of M184V/I was also statistically significant (OR: 0.883 per month, 95% CI: 0.804-0.970, P=0.01), indicating a 11.7% monthly decrease of probability of M184V/I after 3TC interruption. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamics of appearance/disappearance of M184V/I mutation is rapid after 3TC failure/interruption, suggesting ease of development of such a mutation, but also suggesting a remarkable growth disadvantage for HIV. From the clinical perspective, recycling of drugs whose antiviral activity is affected by M184V mutation can be successful after appropriate drug wash-out, also in heavily pretreated patients.

HIV fitness and resistance as covariates associated with the appearance of mutations under antiretroviral treatment.

The ability of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) strains to replicate in human target cells represents a major driving force of the progression of the disease. Despite antiretroviral treatment, HIV overcomes drug pressure by adding new (compensatory) mutations, appearing in a specific and sequential order, that modulate its replication capacity and favour viral escape. In the case of M184V (a mutation involving the catalytic site of HIV reverse transcriptase), no pathways of viral escape have been defined so far; it is thus conceivable that the mutated virus maintains a relatively low replicative capacity. At the time of interruption of specific viral pressure (lamivudine in the case of M184V), wild-type virus easily overgrows mutated strains. A deep molecular analysis (90 clones) conducted on proviral DNA of lymphocytes demonstrates that M184V strains are no longer detected in plasma and proviral DNA shortly after interruption of therapeutic regimens including lamivudine (even if a new therapeutic regimen has been started). This supports the concept that the low fitness of M184V strains is not easily compensated by additional mutations. Taken together, the results suggest that the assessment of viral fitness, either direct (through biological methods) or indirect (through the identification of specific mutations that affect the replicative capacity), may provide substantial advancements in the definition of the long-term efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.