Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 9(5): e00855, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34423920

RESUMEN

Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake-promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal of this study was to compare amphetamine, modafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant at their known primary pharmacological targets, histamine H3 receptors (H3R), dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters, and in various in vivo preclinical models in relation to neurochemistry, locomotion, behavioral sensitization, and food intake. Results confirmed that the primary pharmacological effect of amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol was to increase central dopamine neurotransmission, in part by inhibiting its transporter. Furthermore, solriamfetol increased levels of extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, and decreased the 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC)/DA ratio in the striatum, as reported for modafinil and amphetamine. All these compounds produced hyperlocomotion, behavioral sensitization, and hypophagia, which are common features of psychostimulants and of compounds with abuse potential. In contrast, pitolisant, a selective and potent H3R antagonist/inverse agonist that promotes wakefulness, had no effect on striatal dopamine, locomotion, or food intake. In addition, pitolisant, devoid of behavioral sensitization by itself, attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by either modafinil or solriamfetol. Therefore, pitolisant presents biochemical, neurochemical, and behavioral profiles different from those of amphetamine and other psychostimulants such as modafinil or solriamfetol. In conclusion, pitolisant is a differentiated therapeutic option, when compared with psychostimulants, for the treatment of EDS, as this agent does not show any amphetamine-like properties within in vivo preclinical models.


Asunto(s)
Anfetamina/farmacología , Carbamatos/farmacología , Cuerpo Estriado/efectos de los fármacos , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Conducta Alimentaria/efectos de los fármacos , Locomoción/efectos de los fármacos , Modafinilo/farmacología , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados , Piperidinas/farmacología , Promotores de la Vigilia/farmacología , Ácido 3,4-Dihidroxifenilacético/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/farmacología , Animales , Cuerpo Estriado/metabolismo , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/etiología , Dopamina/metabolismo , Proteínas de Transporte de Dopamina a través de la Membrana Plasmática/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas de Transporte de Dopamina a través de la Membrana Plasmática/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Captación de Dopamina/farmacología , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Agonismo Inverso de Drogas , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/farmacología , Ratones , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neostriado/efectos de los fármacos , Neostriado/metabolismo , Proteínas de Transporte de Noradrenalina a través de la Membrana Plasmática/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas de Transporte de Noradrenalina a través de la Membrana Plasmática/metabolismo , Núcleo Accumbens/efectos de los fármacos , Núcleo Accumbens/metabolismo , Fenilalanina/farmacología , Receptores Histamínicos H3 , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones
2.
Bioconjug Chem ; 27(2): 267-79, 2016 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26566577

RESUMEN

Unorthodox (18)F-labeling strategies not employing the formation of a carbon-(18)F bond are seldom found in radiochemistry. Historically, the formation of a boron- or silicon-(18)F bond has been introduced very early on into the repertoire of labeling chemistries, but is without translation into any clinical radiotracer besides inorganic B[(18)F]F4(-) for brain tumor diagnosis. For many decades these labeling methodologies were forgotten and have just recently been revived by a handful of researchers thinking outside the box. When breaking with established paradigms such as the inability to obtain labeled compounds of high specific activity via isotopic exchange or performing radiofluorination in aqueous media, the research community often reacts skeptically. In 2005 and 2006, two novel labeling methodologies were introduced into radiochemistry for positron emission tomography (PET) tracer development: RBF3(-) labeling reported by Perrin et al. and the SiFA methodology by Schirrmacher, Jurkschat, and Waengler et al. which is based on isotopic exchange (IE). Both labeling methodologies have been complemented by other noncanonical strategies to introduce (18)F into biomolecules of diagnostic importance, thus profoundly enriching the landscape of (18)F radiolabeling. B- and Si-based labeling strategies finally revealed that IE is a viable alternative to established and traditional radiochemistry with the advantage of simplifying both the labeling effort as well as the necessary purification of the radiotracer. Hence IE will be the focus of this contribution over other noncanonical labeling methods. Peptides for tumor imaging especially lend themselves favorably toward one-step labeling via IE, but small molecules have been described as well, taking advantage of these new approaches, and have been used successfully for brain imaging. This Review gives an account of both radiochemistries centered on boron and silicon, describing the very beginnings of their basic research, the path that led to optimization of their chemistries, and the first encouraging preclinical results paving the way to their clinical use. This side by side approach will give the reader the opportunity to follow the development of a new basic discovery into a clinically applicable radiotracer including all the hurdles that have had to be overcome.


Asunto(s)
Boratos/química , Radioisótopos de Flúor/química , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Radiofármacos/química , Silicio/química , Animales , Fluoruros/química , Humanos , Péptidos/química , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequeñas/química
3.
J Org Chem ; 72(2): 466-75, 2007 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17221963

RESUMEN

The high yielding synthesis of heterocycles with defined H-bond accepting and donating capabilities provides for the design of self-assembling structures and specific recognition of biological targets. Herein we report the syntheses and solid-state structures of three self-complementary uracil/thymine derivatives where each presents the standard ADA face inherently complementary to adenine and a synthetically appended DAD face complementary to uracil/thymine. These heterocycles, which have never before been reported or characterized, represent diaminopurine-uracil/thymine hybrids that, in two of the three cases, relate to previously reported heterocyclic hybrids of G and C. All three heterocycles crystallized to afford the first X-ray crystal structures of self-complementary heterocycles capable of ADA-DAD pairing. The potential use in DNA and RNA recognition are briefly discussed.


Asunto(s)
Adenina/química , Técnicas Químicas Combinatorias/métodos , Timina/síntesis química , Uracilo/síntesis química , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Enlace de Hidrógeno , Modelos Moleculares , Estructura Molecular , Timina/análogos & derivados , Timina/química , Uracilo/análogos & derivados , Uracilo/química
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA