RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Understanding barriers to health services, as experienced by adolescents, is important to expand effective and equitable coverage; however, there is limited discussion on methods for conducting barrier assessments and translating findings into action. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of literature published between 2005 and 2019 on barriers to health services for adolescents in low- and middle-income countries. The review was guided by a framework that conceptualized barriers across multiple dimensions of access (availability, geographic accessibility, affordability, and acceptability), utilization, and effective coverage. RESULTS: We identified 339 studies that assessed barriers related to at least one dimension of the operational framework. Acceptability (93%) and availability (88%) of health services were the most frequently studied access dimensions; affordability (45%) and geographic access (32%) were studied less frequently. Less than half (40%) of the studies evaluated utilization, and none of the 339 studies assessed effective coverage. Attention to equity stratifiers (e.g., income, disability) was limited. Topics studied reflected only a subset of the major causes of adolescent death and disability. CONCLUSIONS: Holistic, equity-oriented approaches are needed to better understand barriers across multiple dimensions that together determine whether health services are accessible, used, and effectively meet the needs of different adolescent groups.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Adolescente , Servicios de Salud , Humanos , RentaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The community score card (CSC) is a participatory monitoring and evaluation tool that has been employed to strengthen the mutual accountability of health system and community actors. In this paper we describe the influence of the CSC on selected maternal and newborn service delivery and utilization indicators. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study that used both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. It was implemented in five sub-counties and one town council in Kibuku district in Uganda. Data was collected through 17 key informant interviews and 10 focus group discussions as well as CSC scoring and stakeholder meeting reports. The repeated measures ANOVA test was used to test for statistical significance. Qualitative data was analyzed manually using content analysis. The analysis about the change pathways was guided by the Wild and Harris dimensions of change framework. RESULTS: There was an overall improvement in the common indicators across sub-counties in the project area between the 1st and 5th round scores. Almost all the red scores had changed to green or yellow by round five except for availability of drugs and mothers attending Antenatal care (ANC) in the first trimester. There were statistically significant differences in mean scores for men escorting their wives for ante natal care (ANC) (F(4,20) = 5.45, P = 0.01), availability of midwives (F(4,16) =5.77, P < 0.01), availability of delivery beds (F(4,12) =9.00, P < 0.01) and mothers delivering from traditional birth attendants (TBAs), F(4,16) = 3.86, p = 0.02). The qualitative findings suggest that strengthening of citizens' demand, availability of resources through collaborative problem solving, increased awareness about targeted maternal health services and increased top down performance pressure contributed to positive changes as perceived by community members and their leaders. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The community score cards created opportunities for community leaders and communities to work together to identify innovative ways of dealing with the health service delivery and utilization challenges that they face. Local leaders should encourage the availability of safe spaces for dialogue between communities, health workers and leaders where performance and utilization challenges can be identified and solutions proposed and implemented jointly.
Asunto(s)
Participación de la Comunidad , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Responsabilidad Social , UgandaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Countries with health workforce shortages are increasingly turning to multipurpose community health workers (CHWs) to extend integrated services to the community-level. However, there may be tradeoffs with the number of tasks a CHW can effectively perform before quality and/or productivity decline. This qualitative study was conducted within an existing program in Iringa, Tanzania where HIV-focused CHWs working as volunteers received additional training on maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) promotion, thereby establishing a dual role CHW model. METHODS: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the combined HIV/MNCH CHW model, qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 36 CHWs, 21 supervisors, and 10 program managers were conducted following integration of HIV and MNCH responsibilities (n=67). Thematic analysis explored perspectives on task planning, prioritization and integration, workload, and the feasibility and acceptability of the dual role model. Interview data and field observations were also used to describe implementation differences between HIV and MNCH roles as a basis for further contextualizing the qualitative findings. RESULTS: Perspectives from a diverse set of stakeholders suggested provision of both HIV and MNCH health promotion by CHWs was feasible. Most CHWs attempted to balance HIV/MNCH responsibilities, although some prioritized MNCH tasks. An increased workload from MNCH did not appear to interfere with HIV responsibilities but drew time away from other income-generating activities on which volunteer CHWs rely. Satisfaction with the dual role model hinged on increased community respect, gaining new knowledge/skills, and improving community health, while the remuneration-level caused dissatisfaction, a complaint that could challenge sustainability. Conclusions: Despite extensive literature on integration, little research at the community level exists. This study demonstrated CHWs can feasibly balance HIV and MNCH roles, but not without some challenges related to the heavier workload. Further research is necessary to determine the quality of health promotion in both HIV and MNCH domains, and whether the dual role model can be maintained over time among these volunteers.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Infecciones por VIH , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Adulto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Tanzanía , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine if children presenting without complaints related to the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) are at greater risk for suboptimal screening for IMCI conditions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Thirty-three provinces in Afghanistan. PARTICIPANTS: Observation of 3072 sick child visits selected by systematic random sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A 10 point IMCI assessment index. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one (4.3%) of the 3072 sick child visits involved no IMCI-related complaints. The mean assessment index for all sick child visits was 4.81 (SD 2.41). Visits involving any IMCI-related complaint were associated with a 1.02 point higher mean assessment index than those without IMCI-related complaints (95% CI, 0.52-1.53; P < 0.001). After adjusting for relevant covariates including patient age, caretaker gender, provider type, provider gender, provider IMCI training status and IMCI guideline availability, we found that children with IMCI-related presenting complaints had a significantly better quality of IMCI screening, than those without IMCI presenting complaints (by 0.75 points; 95% CI, 0.25-1.26; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that children with non-IMCI presenting complaints are at greater risk of suboptimal screening compared to children with IMCI-related presenting complaints. The premise of IMCI is to routinely screen all children for conditions responsible for the major burden of childhood disease in countries like Afghanistan. The study illustrates an important finding that facility and provider capacity needs to be improved, particularly during training, supervision and guideline dissemination to ensure that all children receive routine screening for common IMCI conditions.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Afganistán , Manejo de Caso/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
This editorial introduces a series of case studies that together highlight the use of health market interventions to improve access to medicines in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). It underscores the added value of using a systems approach for a holistic understanding of how these interventions interact with the rest of the health system and the intended and unintended consequences that result. It goes on to summarize key findings from each of the studies and concludes with lessons for decision-makers on the design and implementation of market based interventions in LMIC health systems.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the association between health facility characteristics and other individual/household factors with a woman's likelihood of skilled birth attendance in north-central Afghanistan. METHODS: Data from a 2010 household survey of 6879 households in 9 provinces of Afghanistan were linked to routine facility data. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to assess determinants of skilled birth attendance. RESULTS: Women who reported having at least one antenatal visit with a skilled provider were 5.6 times more likely to give birth with a skilled attendant than those who did not. The odds of skilled birth attendance were 84% higher for literate women than those without literacy skills and 79% higher among women in the upper 2 wealth quintiles than women in the poorest quintile. This study did not show any direct linkages between facility characteristics and skilled birth attendance but provided insights into why studies assuming that women seek care at the nearest primary care facility may lead to misinterpretation of care-seeking patterns. Findings reveal a 36 percentage point gap between women who receive skilled antenatal care and those who received skilled birth care. Nearly 60% of women with a skilled attendant at their most recent birth bypassed the nearest primary care facility to give birth at a more distant primary care facility, hospital, or private clinic. Distance and transport barriers were reported as the most common reasons for home birth. DISCUSSION: Assumptions that women who give birth with a skilled attendant do so at the closest health facility may mask the importance of supply-side determinants of skilled birth attendance. More research based on actual utilization patterns, not assumed catchment areas, is needed to truly understand the factors influencing care-seeking decisions in both emergency and nonemergency situations and to adapt strategies to reduce preventable mortality and morbidity in Afghanistan.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Instituciones de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Partería , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Afganistán , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Alfabetización , Análisis Multinivel , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Clase Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND There is a growing interest in the role of private health providers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Informal private providers (IPPs) provide a significant portion of health care in many LMICs, but they have not received training in allopathic medicine. Interventions have been developed to take advantage of their potential to expand access to essential health services, although their success is not well measured. This paper addresses this information gap through a review of interventions designed to improve the quality, coverage, or costs of health services provided by IPPs in LMICs. METHODS A search for published literature in the last 15 years for any intervention dealing with IPPs in a LMIC, where at least one outcome was measured, was conducted through electronic databases PubMed and Global Health, as well as Google for grey literature from the Internet. RESULTS A total of 1272 articles were retrieved, of which 70 separate studies met inclusion criteria. The majority (70%) of outcomes measured proximate indicators such as provider knowledge (61% were positive) and behaviour (56% positive). Training IPPs was the most common intervention tested (77% of studies), but the more effective strategies did not involve training alone. Interventions that changed the institutional relationships and contributed to changing the incentives and accountability environment were most successful, and often required combinations of interventions. CONCLUSION Although there are documented interventions among IPPs, there are few good quality studies. Strategies that change the market conditions for IPPs-by changing incentives and accountability-appear more likely to succeed than those that depend on building individual capacities of IPPs. Understanding the effectiveness of these and other strategies will also require more rigorous research designs that assess contextual factors and document outcomes over longer periods.
Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud , Países en Desarrollo , Sector Privado , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Técnicos Medios en Salud/educación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Homeopatía , Humanos , Rol ProfesionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify characteristics associated with use of skilled birth attendants where health services exist in Afghanistan. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in all 33 provinces in 2004, yielding data from 617 health facilities and 9917 women who lived near the facilities and had given birth in the past 2 years. RESULTS: Only 13% of respondents had used skilled birth attendants. Women from the wealthiest quintile (vs the poorest quintile) had higher odds of use (odds ratio [OR] = 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.4, 8.9). Literacy was strongly associated with use (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 2.0, 3.2), as was living less than 60 minutes from the facility (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.1, 2.0) and residing near a facility with a female midwife or doctor (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.1, 1.8). Women living near facilities that charged user fees (OR = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.6, 1.0) and that had male community health workers (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.5, 0.9) had lower odds of use. CONCLUSIONS: In Afghanistan, the rate of use of safe delivery care must be improved. The financial barriers of poor and uneducated women should be reduced and culturally acceptable alternatives must be considered.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras Obstetrices/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Afganistán , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Transversales , Escolaridad , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Partería/educación , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermeras Obstetrices/educación , Obstetricia/educación , Oportunidad Relativa , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Características de la Residencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Transportes/estadística & datos numéricos , Viaje , GuerraRESUMEN
This paper examines the impact of quality improvements in conjunction with user fees on the utilization and equality of outpatient services at a range of public sector health facilities in India. Project impact on outpatient visits was estimated via the difference-in-difference method using pooled time series visit data from project and control facilities. The results indicate that the quality improvements significantly increased visits at all facility types. The project effect was largest at primary health center (PHC) and community health center (CHC), followed by district hospital (DH) and female district hospital (FDH). Pro-rich inequalities in outpatient visits increased at DHs and FDHs while at CHCs and PHCs the distribution remained equitable. This suggests that quality improvements at public sector health facilities can increase utilization of outpatient services in the presence of nominal user fees, but can also promote greater inequality favoring the better-off. At the referral hospital level, quality improvements should be made in conjuction with programs which encourage utilization by the poor. In contrast, the benefit of quality improvements at PHCs and CHCs is equitably distributed.