Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gesundheitswesen ; 86(8-09): 549-552, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242158

RESUMEN

Digital transformation of healthcare is the dominating discussion topic for all healthcare stakeholders. Digital transformation encompasses all areas of healthcare and is far more than digital healthcare applications (DiGA), digital care applications (DiPA), telemedicine applications, telematics infrastructure activities, and applications from the fields of eHealth, mHealth, or Telehealth. All existing care processes and structures in the healthcare system are undergoing an inventory in order to transfer analog components of care into a digital context. The digital transformation is not taking place exclusively in economic sectors such as healthcare, but is a process of change throughout society in the collection, use, provision, linking and evaluation of information (=data). For the healthcare sector, it is clear that different technical concepts are used, while digital healthcare takes place in different places and at different times, may include different user (groups) and retains, expands or changes the healthcare context. Established healthcare functions such as diagnostics, therapy, documentation and the management of healthcare services are retained and transferred to a digital context. In addition, new application areas will emerge, such as the overarching access to health data by different actors, real-time-driven monitoring systems of holistic health data, (clinical) decision systems, or the provision of data for health services. Even if the majority of the digital transformation has not yet taken place, it is assumed that these functions and application areas of healthcare will serve to sustainably improve the quality of care and benefit the well-being of all (future) patients. For the transfer of existing processes into a digital context and the establishment of new application areas, there are prerequisites for healthcare institutions and the healthcare system itself.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Telemedicina , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Alemania , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Tecnología Digital , Predicción
2.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes ; 109(8): 605-14, 2015.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26704822

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Joint replacement surgery is one of the most often performed routine procedures for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in Germany. Currently, there is no consensus on indication criteria for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). OBJECTIVES: The topic indication for TKA was processed using six guiding questions concerning: 1) Common practice in determining the indication for TKA; 2) Inclusion criteria in clinical trials; 3) Treatment goals/goal criteria; 4) Predictors for goal attainment; 5) Economic aspects of determining a TKA indication; 6) Guidelines of the "Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies" (AWMF) in other areas. METHODS: The evidence mapping was conducted by systematically searching Medline via Ovid, the Cochrane Library, through hand searching national guidelines and selected journals as well as the AWMF guideline portal. RESULTS OF THE GUIDING QUESTIONS: 1) In Germany there is currently no consented guideline regarding indications for TKA surgery. 2) Indication criteria for clinical trials are: diagnosed osteoarthritis of the knee, limitations of age and BMI. The most common criteria for exclusion include rheumatoid/inflammatory arthritis, secondary diagnoses and allergies. 3) As yet, no international initiatives have been identified which, by involving all relevant stakeholders, have reached consensus regarding the indication criteria for TKA. 4) A variety of predictors were identified with effects on individual treatment goals acting in different directions. 5) Very few studies were identified concerning economic aspects of determining TKA indication. 6) Comparable AWMF guidelines are currently not available. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that specific systematic reviews are needed to explore the following questions: What are the treatment goals of a TKA intervention? For whom are these relevant? And how are they measured? Continuous analyses are recommended in the field of predictors for a positive TKA outcome.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Consenso , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Alemania , Adhesión a Directriz , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA