Technical standardization of laparoscopic repair of Morgagni diaphragmatic hernia in children: results of a multicentric survey on 43 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to standardize the surgical correction technique of congenital Morgagni diaphragmatic hernia (CMDH), analyzing the results of an international multicentric survey. METHODS: The medical records of 43 patients (29 boys, 14 girls) who underwent laparoscopic repair of CMDH in 8 pediatric surgery units in a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Their average age was 3.3 years. Ten patients (23.2%) presented associated malformations: 9 Down syndrome (20.9%) and 1 palate cleft (2.3%). Thirty-five patients (81.4%) were asymptomatic, whereas 8 patients (18.6%) presented symptoms such as respiratory distress, cough or abdominal pain. As for preoperative work-up, all patients received a chest X-ray (100%), 15/43 (34.8%) a CT scan, 8/43 (18.6%) a barium enema and 4/43 (9.3%) a US. RESULTS: No conversion to open surgery was reported. Average operative time was 61.2 min (range 45-110 min). In 38/43 (88.3%) patients, a trans-parietal stitch was positioned in order to reduce the tension during the repair. In 14/43 cases (32.5%), the sac was resected; in only 1/43 case (2.3%) a dual mesh of goretex was adopted to reinforce the closure. Average hospital stay was 2.8 days. The average follow-up was 4.2 years, and it consisted in annual clinical controls and chest X-ray. We recorded 2 complications (4.6%): one small pleural opening that required no drain and one recurrence (2.3%), re-operated in laparoscopy, with no further recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series published in the literature on this topic. Laparoscopic CMDH repair is well standardized: The full-thickness anterior abdominal wall repair using non-resorbable suture with interrupted stitches is the technique of choice. Postoperative outcome was excellent. Recurrence rate was very low, about 2% in our series. We believe that children with CMDH should be always treated in laparoscopy following the technical details reported in this paper.

Twenty years' experience for reduction of ileocolic intussusceptions by saline enema under sonography control.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is a well-established efficient diagnostic tool for ileocolic intussusceptions in children. It can also be used to control hydrostatic reduction by saline enemas. This reduction method presents the advantage of avoiding radiations. Parents can even stay with their children during the procedure, which is comforting for both. The purpose of this study was to present our 20 years' experience in intussusception reductions using saline enema under ultrasound control and to assess its efficiency and safety. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective single center study included patients with ileocolic intussusceptions diagnosed by ultrasound between June 1993 and July 2013. We excluded the data of patients with spontaneous reduction or who underwent primary surgery because of contraindications to hydrostatic reduction (peritonitis, medium or huge abdominal effusion, ischemia on Doppler, bowel perforation). A saline enema was infused into the colon until the reduction was sonographically confirmed. The procedure was repeated if not efficient. Light sedation was practiced in some children. RESULTS: Eighty-tree percent of the reductions were successful with a median of 1 attempt. Reduction success decreased with the number of attempts but was still by 16% after 4 attempts. The early recurrence rates were 14.5%, and 61.2% of those had a successful second complete reduction. Forty-six patients needed surgery (11 of them had a secondary intussusception). Sedation multiplies success by 10. In this period, only one complication is described. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guided intussusception reduction by saline enema is an efficient and safe procedure. It prevents exposure of a young child to a significant amount of radiation, with similar success rate. We had very low complication rate (1/270 cases or 3‰). The success rate could be increased by standardized procedures including: systematic sedation, trained radiologists, accurate pressure measurement, and number and duration of attempts.