RESUMEN
This study explores the attitudes of Australian evangelical Christian doctors to healing, suffering and good practice, using in-depth interviews. Doctors described an intellectualised faith, in which medical care was conceived in itself as a way of bearing witness. The alleviation of suffering, for these doctors, included supporting patients to rediscover purpose and meaning in their lives. There was diversity of opinion about evangelising, with many feeling that this was a contingent activity best conducted outside the consultation. This cohort of doctors, mostly non-denominational, had consciously engaged in work with the poor and marginalised as an expression of their faith.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cristianismo/psicología , Médicos/psicología , Religión y Medicina , Adulto , Australia , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación y Consulta , Espiritualidad , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/terapiaAsunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Refugiados , Altruismo , Australia , Conducta Cooperativa , Predicción , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Política de Salud/tendencias , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Estado de Salud , Salud Holística , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on different models of clinical governance and to explore their relevance to Australian primary health care, and their potential contributions on quality and safety. DATA SOURCES: 25 electronic databases, scanning reference lists of articles and consultation with experts in the field. We searched publications in English after 1999, but a search of the German language literature for a specific model type was also undertaken. The grey literature was explored through a hand search of the medical trade press and websites of relevant national and international clearing houses and professional or industry bodies. 11 software packages commonly used in Australian general practice were reviewed for any potential contribution to clinical governance. STUDY SELECTION: 19 high-quality studies that assessed outcomes were included. DATA EXTRACTION: All abstracts were screened by one researcher, and 10% were screened by a second researcher to crosscheck screening quality. Studies were reviewed and coded by four reviewers, with all studies being rated using standard critical appraisal tools such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist. Two researchers reviewed the Australian general practice software. Interviews were conducted with 16 informants representing service, regional primary health care, national and international perspectives. DATA SYNTHESIS: Most evidence supports governance models which use targeted, peer-led feedback on the clinician's own practice. Strategies most used in clinical governance models were audit, performance against indicators, and peer-led reflection on evidence or performance. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for clinical governance is fragmented, and focuses mainly on process rather than outcomes. Few publications address models that enhance safety, efficiency, sustainability and the economics of primary health care. Locally relevant clinical indicators, the use of computerised medical record systems, regional primary health care organisations that have the capacity to support the uptake of clinical governance at the practice level, and learning from the Aboriginal community-controlled sector will help integrate clinical governance into primary care.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Medicina General/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Australia , Eficiencia Organizacional , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolving roles of practice nurses in Australia and the impact of nurses on general practice function. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Multimethod research in two substudies: (a) a rapid appraisal based on observation, photographs of workspaces, and interviews with nurses, doctors and managers in 25 practices in Victoria and New South Wales, conducted between September 2005 and March 2006; and (b) naturalistic longitudinal case studies of introduced change in seven practices in Victoria, NSW, South Australia, Queensland and Western Australia, conducted between January 2007 and March 2008. RESULTS: We identified six roles of nurses in general practice: patient carer, organiser, quality controller, problem solver, educator and agent of connectivity. Although the first three roles are appreciated as nursing strengths by both nurses and doctors, doctors tended not to recognise nurses' educator and problem solver roles within the practice. Only 21% of the clinical activities undertaken by nurses were directly funded through Medicare. The role of the nurse as an agent of connectivity, uniting the different workers within the practice organisation, is particularly notable in small and medium-sized practices, and may be a key determinant of organisational resilience. CONCLUSION: Nursing roles may be enhanced through progressive broadening of the scope of the patient care role, fostering the nurse educator role, and addressing barriers to role enhancement, such as organisational inexperience with interprofessional work and lack of a career structure. In adjusting the funding structure for nurses, care should be taken not to create perverse incentives to limit nurses' clinical capacity or undermine the flexibility that gives practice nursing much of its value for nurses and practices.