Effects of phytoestrogen supplementation on intermediate cardiovascular disease risk factors among postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IMPORTANCE: Phytoestrogens are becoming popular constituents of human diets and are increasingly used by postmenopausal women. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to determine the effects of phytoestrogen supplementation on intermediate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in postmenopausal women. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Five electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar) were systematically searched to identify eligible studies, that is, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the association of phytoestrogen supplementation with CVD risk factors (serum lipids, homocysteine, fibrinogen, markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial function, carotid intima-media thickness [CIMT]) in postmenopausal women. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a predefined data collection form. FINDINGS: In total, 56 RCTs were identified, including 4,039 individual postmenopausal women. There was substantial heterogeneity in quality across studies. Twenty-six (46%) RCTs showed poor quality and there was an indication of publication bias presence for some of the biomarkers. Results are reported in pooled mean difference (95% CI) of changes. Use of phytoestrogens was associated with a decrease in serum total cholesterol (-0.27 mmol/L [-0.41 to -0.13]), low-density lipoprotein (-0.25 mmol/L [-0.37 to -0.13]), triglycerides (-0.20 mmol/L [-0.28 to -0.11]), and apolipoprotein B (-0.13 g/L [-0.23 to -0.03]) and with an increase in serum apolipoprotein A-1 (0.04 g/L [0.02-0.07]. Also, phytoestrogen supplementation was associated with a decrease in serum intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (-18.86 ng/mL [-30.06 to -7.65]) and E-selectin (-2.32 ng/mL [-4.05 to -0.59]). There was no association observed between phytoestrogen supplementation and inflammatory markers, fibrinogen, homocysteine, or other endothelial function markers. In contrast, use of phytoestrogens was associated with an increase in CIMT (9.34 µm [95% CI, 0.39-18.29]). Effect estimates of phytoestrogen supplementation on oxidative stress could not be pooled. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Phytoestrogen supplementation seems to modestly improve the CVD risk profile of postmenopausal women by influencing blood lipids and parameters of endothelial function. In women with an increased risk of atherosclerosis, although modest, a harmful effect on CIMT progression may be present. Because of limited quality and the heterogeneous nature of the current evidence, additional rigorous studies are needed to explore the role of phytoestrogens in menopausal cardiovascular health. : Video Summary: http://links.lww.com/MENO/A593.

Video Summary: http://links.lww.com/MENO/A593.

Hospitalization rates of generic metoprolol compared with the original beta-blocker in an epidemiological database study.

PURPOSE: A less favourable galenic profile of generic formulations of the beta-blocker metoprolol raised the concern of a higher risk for serious cardiovascular (CV) events. We assessed hospital admission rates for CV diseases and prescription prevalences of various drugs using claims data of statutory health insurances (SHIs) to compare the incidence of serious CV events among users of original and generic metoprolol. Index events included hospitalization due to myocardial infarction, hypertensive crisis and stroke. METHODS: Data files of three SHIs were linked with dispensing data of drug prescriptions from each pharmacy's electronic data processing centre on an individual basis. Incidences of hospital admissions among patients receiving original metoprolol and among patients treated with the generic equivalent were compared by logistic regression, stratified for Bremen and the rest of Northern Germany. Risk estimates and confidence intervals were adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 49,673 patients receiving metoprolol were identified within a cohort of 3,649,285 insurance members. While the crude analysis revealed a higher risk for index events in patients receiving the generic drug (Bremen: RR 1.45; Northern Germany: RR 1.14), no elevated risk remained after confounder adjustment (Bremen: OR 1.06; Northern Germany: OR 1.04). Among co-morbid conditions considered as confounders, a previous CV event and an elevated thromboembolic risk exerted the strongest effect on index events. CONCLUSIONS: SHI data are a valuable source for pharmacoepidemiology and health services research in Germany. Incidence rates of serious CV events did not reveal any noticeable differences between the original and the generic group after confounder adjustment.