De-imFAR phase II project: a study protocol for a cluster randomised implementation trial to evaluate the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies to reduce low-value statin prescribing in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) of statins and foster healthy lifestyle promotion in cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention in low-risk patients. To this end, we will compare the effectiveness and feasibility of several de-implementation strategies developed following the structured design process of the Behaviour Change Wheel targeting key determinants of the clinical decision-making process in CVD prevention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cluster randomised implementation trial, with an additional control group, will be launched, involving family physicians (FPs) from 13 Integrated Healthcare Organisations (IHOs) of Osakidetza-Basque Health Service with non-zero incidence rates of PIP of statins in 2021. All FPs will be exposed to a non-reflective decision assistance strategy based on reminders and decision support tools. Additionally, FPs from two of the IHOs will be randomly assigned to one of two increasingly intensive de-implementation strategies: adding a decision information strategy based on knowledge dissemination and a reflective decision structure strategy through audit/feedback. The target population comprises women aged 45-74 years and men aged 40-74 years with moderately elevated cholesterol levels but no diagnosed CVD and low cardiovascular risk (REGICOR<7.5%), who attend at least one appointment with any of the participating FPs (May 2022-May 2023), and will be followed until May 2024. We use the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate outcomes. The main outcome will be the change in the incidence rate of PIP of statins and healthy lifestyle counselling in the study population 12 and 24 months after FPs' exposure to the strategies. Moreover, FPs' perception of their feasibility and acceptability, and patient experience regarding the quality of care received will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Basque Country Clinical Research Ethics Committee and was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04022850). Results will be disseminated in scientific peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04022850.

Reducing Unnecessary Treatments for Acute Bronchiolitis Through an Integrated Care Pathway.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the impact of an integrated care pathway on reducing unnecessary treatments for acute bronchiolitis. METHODS: We implemented an evidence-based integrated care pathway in primary care (PC) centers and the referral emergency department (ED). This is the third quality improvement cycle in the management of acute bronchiolitis implemented by our research team. Family and provider experiences were incorporated by using design thinking methodology. A multifaceted plan that included several quality improvement initiatives was adopted to reduce unnecessary treatments. The primary outcome was the percentage of infants prescribed salbutamol. Secondary outcomes were prescribing rates of other medications. The main control measures were hospitalization and unscheduled return rates. Salbutamol prescribing rate data were plotted on run charts. RESULTS: We included 1768 ED and 1092 PC visits, of which 913 (51.4%) ED visits and 558 (51.1%) PC visits occurred in the postintervention period. Salbutamol use decreased from 7.7% (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8-21.4) to 0% (IQR 0-1.9) in the ED and from 14.1% (IQR 5.8-21.6) to 5% (IQR 2.7-8) in PC centers. In the ED, the overall epinephrine use rate fell from 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2-11.1) to 4.6% (95% CI, 3.4-6.1) (P < .001). In PC centers, overall corticosteroid and antibiotic prescribing rates fell from 3.5% (95% CI, 2.2-5.4) to 1.1% (95% CI, 0.4-2.3) (P =.007) and from 9.5% (95% CI; 7.3-12.3) to 1.7% (95% CI, 0.9-7.3) (P <.001), respectively. No significant variations were noted in control measures. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated clinical pathway that incorporates the experiences of families and clinicians decreased the use of medications in the management of bronchiolitis.