Neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM-/-) null mice show impaired sensitization of the startle response.

The neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) plays important roles in development of the nervous system and in synaptic plasticity and memory formation in the adult. The present study sought to further investigate the role of NCAM in learning by testing habituation and footshock sensitization learning of the startle response (SR) in NCAM null mutant (NCAM-/-) and wildtype littermate (NCAM+/+) mice. Whereas habituation is a form of non-associative learning, footshock sensitization is induced by rapid contextual fear conditioning. Habituation was tested by repetitive presentation of acoustic and tactile startle stimuli. Although NCAM-/- mice showed differences in sensitivity in both stimulus modalities, habituation learning was intact in NCAM-/- mice, suggesting that NCAM does not play a role in the mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity in the startle pathway. Footshock sensitization was elicited by presentation of electric footshocks between two series of acoustic stimuli. In contrast to habituation, footshock sensitization learning was attenuated in NCAM-/- mice: the acoustic SR increase after the footshocks was lower in the mutant than in wildtype mice, indicating that NCAM plays an important role in the relevant brain areas, such as amygdala and/or the hippocampus.

Difference in anxiety and sensitization of the acoustic startle response between the two inbred mouse strains BALB/cAN and DBA/2N.

The inbred mouse strain BALB has been proposed to be an animal model for pathological anxiety. BALB exhibits a stronger acoustic startle response (ASR) than the 'less emotional' inbred strain DBA. Four experiments were conducted to determine whether this strong ASR is due to a higher anxiety level and/or to greater sensitization in BALB than in DBA, with the following results: (1) The ASR to the very first startle stimulus was found to be much stronger in BALB than in DBA, and freezing behavior evoked by startle stimuli was more pronounced in BALB than in DBA. These findings indicate a higher level of anxiety in this strain. (2) ASR amplitudes of BALB initially rose much higher during consecutive startle stimuli and remained at a high level much longer than in DBA. Thereafter, ASR amplitude dropped more slowly and to a lesser degree than in DBA. Startle amplitudes decreased similarly in both strains (strong exponential decrease) only when a low sound pressure level (SPL) was used which elicited approximately the same low ASR in both strains. These results can only be explained by increased sensitization in BALB. (3) The slope of the i/o-function, which represents the relation between sensory input and motor output, was steeper in BALB than in DBA. As it has been shown recently, sensitization increases the slope of the startle i/o-function indicating increased sensitization in BALB. It is discussed, however, whether anxiety also contributes to this effect. (4) Footshocks increased the ASR much less in BALB than in DBA, again showing increased sensitization in BALB. Both a higher level of anxiety and greater sensitization therefore determined the greater strength of the ASR in BALB than in DBA.

Increased sensitization of acoustic startle response in spasmodic mice with a mutation of the glycine receptor alpha1-subunit gene.

The spontaneous mutant mouse spasmodic (spd) carries a missense mutation affecting the glycine receptor alpha1-subunit gene. This results in a decreased binding affinity to glycine. Spd mutants show exaggerated acoustic startle responses (ASR). The present study sought to elucidate whether this increased ASR is due to a changed auditory processing or to stronger motor output resulting from a disinhibited motor system or, alternatively, to changes in modulatory influences on the startle pathway, namely in the mechanisms underlying habituation and sensitization. We found that in homozygous spd/spd mutants the startle threshold was lower, and the recorded slope of input/output (i/o) function, which reflects the relation between sensory input and motor output, was steeper. During repetitive presentation of high sound pressure level (SPL) startle stimuli (25 dB above startle threshold), ASR amplitudes did not decrease in spd/spd mutants as they do in the wildtype. In contrast, ASR amplitudes decreased when low SPL startle stimuli were presented. Footshocks presented after high SPL startle stimuli did not cause a further increase in ASR amplitudes of spd/spd mutants as in the wildtype. In heterozygous spd/+ mutants all these parameters were between those of spd/spd mutants and wildtype mice but closer to those of the wildtype. The steeper slope of i/o function in spd/spd mutants may be caused by both an increased sensory input and an increased motor output. The altered course of ASR amplitudes during repetitive stimulation and the deficit in additional footshock sensitization, however, can only be explained by an increased sensitization level in the spd/spd mutants. In accordance with the "dual process theory" strong sensitization evoked by high SPL startle stimuli supposedly counteracts habituation, leading to a constant high ASR amplitude. Furthermore, additional footshock sensitization is prevented. The increased sensitization level may be due to a change in auditory processing leading to a stronger sensitizing effect of the startle stimuli with high SPL. Alternatively, glycinergic tonic inhibition of sensitizing structures (e.g. the amygdala) in the wildtype may be diminished in spd/spd mutants, thus leading to a high sensitization level.

Interaction between acoustic and electric sensitization of the acoustic startle response in rats.

Sensitization is the general increase of responsiveness observed after aversive stimulation. Usually footshocks are used as aversive stimuli. According to the 'Dual Process Theory' by Groves and Thompson. Psychol. Rev. 1970;77:419-450, not only additional aversive stimuli but also the response-eliciting stimuli themselves have a sensitizing effect, the degree of sensitization depending upon the stimulus intensity. We tested this suggestion in the footshock sensitization paradigm of the acoustic startle response (ASR): (1) High SPL (sound pressure level) acoustic stimuli (119 dB SPL) presented instead of footshocks also elicited strong sensitization. (2) While footshocks presented after startle stimuli with low SPL (95 dB) were able to produce a strong further sensitization of the ASR, footshocks presented after startle stimuli with high SPL (110 dB) only caused a minor sensitization of the ASR. (3) Diazepam (3 mg/kg i.p.) decreased ASR to high SPL (115 dB) stimuli. In this case footshocks elicited significant sensitization of the ASR despite intense startle stimuli. The present results support the 'Dual Process Theory'. Furthermore we could show that acoustic and footshock sensitization interact. We therefore suggest that both, acoustic and footshock sensitization, are mediated partly via the same neural circuitry.