Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 45(11): 1716-1724, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35906491

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Evidence on efficacy and long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices is still conflicting. Therefore, this study aims to assess whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for the treatment of infra-popliteal occlusions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). STUDY DESIGN: The randomized controlled, single-blinded, multicentre, investigator-initiated study aims to enrol 230 participants with CLTI and infra-popliteal occlusions at up to 25 centres. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty or to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Bailout stenting in case of flow-limiting dissection or ≥ 50% residual diameter stenosis is permitted. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome is the Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency at 6 months, defined as the absence of target lesion occlusion with restoration of in-line flow to the ankle. Key secondary outcome is non-inferiority in the proportionate occurrence of major adverse limb events and perioperative all-cause death at 30 days. Overall, participants will be followed for 36 months to assess further secondary efficacy and safety outcomes. ASSUMED GAIN OF KNOWLEDGE: If sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty turns out to be superior to uncoated-balloon angioplasty regarding patency of infra-popliteal lesions without safety signals, it could become a welcome treatment option for patients with CLTI. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04772300, German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024629. Level of Evidence Level 2a, randomized controlled trial.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Citrus aurantiifolia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Angioplastia de Balón/métodos , Isquemia Crónica que Amenaza las Extremidades , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Sirolimus , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
2.
Trials ; 22(1): 665, 2021 Sep 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34583746

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular revascularization has established as the first-line therapy of femoropopliteal artery disease. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty proved to be superior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) regarding prevention of restenosis and need for recurrent revascularization. Over the past years, paclitaxel was the only active drug to inhibit neointimal proliferation which could be processed to an appropriate balloon coating. The purpose of this study is to assess whether efficacy and safety of sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is noninferior to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. METHODS: This randomized controlled, single-blinded, multicentre, investigator-initiated noninferiority trial aims to enrol a total of 478 participants with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease of Rutherford category 2 to 4 due to de novo stenosis or restenosis. After pre-dilation, participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either sirolimus- or paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. Post-dilation with the drug-coated balloon (DCB) used or standard balloon is mandatory in case ≥ 50%, and optional in case of ≥ 30% residual diameter stenosis. Bailout stenting with bare-metal nitinol stents should be conducted in case of flow-limiting dissection. Primary noninferiority endpoints are primary patency and the composite of all-cause mortality, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are clinical and hemodynamic improvement, change in health-related quality of life, and safety throughout 60 months. DISCUSSION: Although concerns about long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices were not confirmed by recent patient-level data analyses, conflicting evidence contributed to a loss of confidence among patients and physicians. Therefore, sirolimus, known for a broader therapeutic range than paclitaxel, may serve as a welcome alternative. This will be justified if noninferiority of sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty against the current standard of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty can be demonstrated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04475783 . Registered on 17 July 2020 EUDAMED No. CIV-20-11-035172, DRKS00022452.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA