Cost Analysis and Financial Implications of a Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program in the USA.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the financial implications of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in the USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cost analysis of 100 CRS/HIPEC procedures to examine the impact of patient and procedural factors on hospital costs and reimbursement. A comparison of surgeons' work relative value units (wRVUs) between CRS/HIPEC and a representative sample of complex surgical oncology procedures was made to assess the physicians' compensation rate. Univariable and multivariable backward logistic regression was used to analyze the association between perioperative variables and high direct cost (HDCs). RESULTS: The median direct cost per CRS/HIPEC procedure was US $44,770. The median hospital reimbursement was US $43,066, while professional reimbursement was US $8608, resulting in a positive contribution margin of US $7493/procedure. However, the contribution margin significantly varied with the payer mix. Privately insured patients had a positive median contribution margin of US $23,033, whereas Medicare-insured patients had a negative contribution margin of US $13,034. Length of stay (LOS) had the most significant association with HDC, and major complications had the most significant association with LOS. Finally, CRS/HIPEC procedures generated a median of 13 wRVU/h, which is significantly lower than the wRVU/h generated by open pancreatoduodenectomies, open gastrectomies, and hepatectomies. However, higher operation complexity and multiple visceral resections help compensate for the relatively low wRVU/h. CONCLUSIONS: CRS/HIPEC is an expensive operation, and prolonged LOS has the most significant impact on the total cost of the procedure. High-quality care is essential to improve patient outcomes and maintain the economic sustainability of the procedure.

Hospital Designations and Their Impact on Guideline-Concordant Care and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. Do They Matter?

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) requires complex multidisciplinary care. European evidence suggests potential benefit from regionalization, however, data characterizing the ideal setting in the United States are sparse. Our study compares the significance of four hospital designations on guideline-concordant care (GCC) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Texas Cancer Registry was queried for 17,071 patients with PDAC treated between 2004 and 2015. Clinical data were correlated with hospital designations: NCI designated (NCI), high volume (HV), safety net (SNH), and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accredited (ACS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression were used to assess associations with GCC [on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations]. Cox regression analysis assessed survival. RESULTS: Only 43% of patients received GCC. NCI had the largest associated risk reduction (HR 0.61, CI 0.58-0.65), followed by HV (HR 0.87, CI 0.83-0.90) and ACS (HR 0.91, CI 0.87-0.95). GCC was associated with a survival benefit in the full (HR 0.75, CI 0.69-0.81) and resected cohort (HR 0.74, CI 0.68-0.80). NCI (OR 1.52, CI 1.37-1.70), HV (OR 1.14, CI 1.05-1.23), and SNH (OR 0.78, CI 0.68-0.91) all correlated with receipt of GCC. For resected patients, ACS (OR 0.63, CI 0.50-0.79) and SNH (OR 0.50, CI 0.33-0.75) correlate with GCC. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 43% of patients received GCC. Treatment at NCI and HV correlated with improved GCC and survival. Including GCC as a metric in accreditation standards could impact survival for patients with PDAC.

Non-home Discharge and Prolonged Length of Stay After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: Predictive models for nonhome discharge (NHD) have been proposed in major surgical specialties. The rates and risk factors associated with NHD and prolonged length of stay (PLOS) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for NHD and PLOS after CRS/HIPEC in a national cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CRS/HIPEC cases were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2011-2012 data set. Patients with an NHD or PLOS (>30 d) were compared with a group of patients discharged to home within 30 d. Univariate analysis was used to compare patient characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative complications among both groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of NHD and PLOS. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-six patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC were identified, of which 44 (7.9%) were not discharged to home within 30 d. The rate of NHD and PLOS in this cohort was 4.1% and 3.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥65 y, pre-op albumin <3.0 g/dL, and having a multivisceral resection as independent predictors of NHD/PLOS. If all three predictors are met preoperatively, the probability of NHD/PLOS was calculated to be 30.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for NHD/PLOS after CRS/HIPEC were advanced age, hypoalbuminemia, and multivisceral resection. Adequate identification of these risk factors may facilitate preoperative discussion with patients, and improve discharge planning and resource utilization.

Failure to rescue following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) can significantly improve the survival in selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This study aims to identify perioperative patient characteristics predictive of failure to rescue (FTR), mortality following postoperative complications from CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: Patients suffering a complication following CRS/HIPEC between 2005 and 2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set. FTR was defined as 30-d mortality in the setting of a complication. Patients who suffered FTR were compared against those who survived a complication (non-FTR). Predictors of FTR were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 915 eligible CRS/HIPEC cases were identified. In all, 382 patients (42%) developed ≥1 postoperative complication, and 88 patients (10%) suffered ≥1 major complication. Seventeen patients died following a complication, amounting to an FTR rate of 4%. FTR patients were more likely than non-FTR patients to have dependent functional status (18% versus 2%, P = 0.01), have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 status (29% versus 8%, P = 0.01), develop ≥3 complications (65% versus 24%, P < 0.01), and suffer a major complication (94% versus 20%, P < 0.01). The following were independently associated with FTR: ASA class 4 (odds ratio [OR]: 13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-146.8) and major complications (OR: 66.0, 95% CI, 8.4-516.6). CONCLUSIONS: ASA class 4, major morbidity, and likely dependent functional status are independent predictors of FTR following CRS/HIPEC to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis. Therefore, ASA class 4 and dependent functional status should be considered as contraindications for CRS/HIPEC and only offered in highly selective cases.

Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion in Patients with High-Grade, High-Volume Disseminated Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: High-grade (HG) mucinous appendiceal neoplasms (MAN) have a worse prognosis than low-grade histology. Our objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS/HIPEC) in patients with high-grade, high-volume (HG-HV) peritoneal metastases in whom the utility of this aggressive approach is controversial. METHODS: Prospectively collected perioperative data were compared between patients with peritoneal metastases from HG-HV MAN, defined as simplified peritoneal cancer index (SPCI) ≥12, and those with high-grade, low-volume (HG-LV; SPCI <12) disease. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression models identified prognostic factors affecting oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 54 patients with HG-HV and 43 with HG-LV peritoneal metastases underwent CRS/HIPEC. The HG-HV group had longer operative time, increased blood loss/transfusion, and increased intensive care unit length of stay (p < 0.05). Incomplete macroscopic cytoreduction (CC-1/2/3) was higher in the HG-HV group compared with the HG-LV group (68.5 vs. 32.6 %; p = 0.005). Patients with HG-HV disease demonstrated worse survival than those with HG-LV disease (overall survival [OS] 17 vs. 42 m, p = 0.009; time to progression (TTP) 10 vs. 14 m, p = 0.024). However, when complete macroscopic resection (CC-0) was achieved, the OS and progression-free survival of patients with HG-HV disease were comparable with HG-LV disease (OS 56 vs. 52 m, p = 0.728; TTP 20 vs. 19 m, p = 0.393). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model, CC-0 resection was the only significant predictor of improved survival for patients with HG-HV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with HG-HV peritoneal metastases from MAN have worse prognosis compared with patients with HG-LV disease, their survival is comparable when complete macroscopic cytoreduction is achieved.

Institutional learning curve of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion for peritoneal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) is routinely used to treat certain peritoneal carcinomatoses (PC), but it can be associated with relatively high complication rates, prolonged hospital length of stay, and potential mortality. Our objective was to determine the learning curve (LC) of CRS/HIPEC in our high-volume institution. METHODS: A total of 370 patients with PC from mucinous appendiceal neoplasms (MAN = 282), malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM = 60), and gastric cancer (GC = 24) were studied. Outcomes analyzed included incomplete cytoreduction (IC), severe morbidity (SM), 60-day mortality, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio test (RA-SPRT) was employed to assess the LC of CRS/HIPEC for IC and SM using prespecified odds ratio (OR) boundaries derived from previously published data. Risk adjusted-cumulative average probability (RA-CAP) was used to analyze 1-year PFS and 2-year OS. RESULTS: Complete cytoreduction, severe morbidity, and 60-day mortality were 84.2, 30, and 1.9 % respectively. Higher simplified peritoneal cancer index was the major independent risk factor for IC, whereas high-grade histology, IC, and diagnosis of MPM and GC (compared with MAN) were predictors of SM after CRS/HIPEC (p < 0.05). RA-SPRT showed that approximately 180 cases are needed to achieve the lowest risk of IC and SM. Ninety cases were needed to achieve a steady 1-year PFS and 2-year OS in RA-CAP plots. CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of cytoreduction, morbidity, and mortality rates for CRS/HIPEC at our institution are comparable to previously reported data. Approximately 180 and 90 procedures are required to improve operative and oncologic outcomes respectively.

Does obesity affect outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion for disseminated mucinous appendiceal neoplasms?

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been described as a risk factor for surgical complications and may play a prominent role in the progression, recurrence, and survival rates of various cancers. Our objective was to investigate the impact of being overweight or obese on perioperative and oncologic outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from mucinous appendiceal neoplasms (MAN). METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database (2001-2010) of CRS/HIPEC for PC from MAN, we evaluated the body mass index (BMI) of patients, categorizing them into normal weight (NW < 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (OW = 25 to 29.9 kg/m(2)), and obese (OB ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). We compared the perioperative and oncologic outcomes among groups. RESULTS: Of the 282 patients in the database, 234 had BMI data available, and 81, 79, and 74 patients were categorized as NW, OW, and OB, respectively. Although there was a trend toward increased risk of overall complications, wound infections, deep vein thrombosis, respiratory and renal complications, and anastomotic leaks in the OW and OB groups, these differences only achieved statistical significance for renal (p = 0.03) and pulmonary (p = 0.02) complications in the OW and OB groups, respectively. The 5-year survival rate for NW, OW, and OB patients was 63.9, 48, and 54.4 %, respectively (p = 0.63). The median time to progression was 21.1 (NW), 21.7 (OW), and 23.9 (OB) months (p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: OW and OB patients may have an increased risk of renal and pulmonary complications, respectively. Obesity has no major impact on perioperative mortality and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for MAN.