Efficacy and safety of ropivacaine HCl in peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Myotonic dystrophy (DM1) is the most common muscle disease in adults, affecting approximately 1:8000 individuals, characterized by myotonia and muscular wasting and a multisystemic involvement that includes heart, brain, respiratory and endocrine system, and eye. Conduction system is selectively involved, often causing cardiac sudden death. Early onset posterior subcapsular cataract is a characteristic feature of myotonic dystrophy, requiring surgical treatment. However, DM1 is associated with many anesthetic hazards; sensitivity to anesthetic drugs, especially muscle relaxants and opioids, may complicate postoperative care. Local anesthesia also requires attention. We investigated the heart response to local anesthesia Ropivacaine Hcl administration in 16 DM1 patients (12M:4F) consecutively undergoing cataract surgery, by analyzing heart rate, ventricular and supraventricular ectopic beats, runs of tachycardia and pauses ≥ 2.5 sec., through a 24h-Holter monitoring, registered before and within 24 hours after surgery. The average age of patients was 47.4 years (range 30.2-55.9). At baseline, one patient had a pacemaker and 3 a defibrillator. Two patients presented a first-degree atrio-ventricular-block; three showed ectopic ventricular beats, on anti-arrhythmic drug treatment. No significant differences in heart rate values (73 ± 15b/m versus 76 ± 13b/m) were observed after cataract surgery, nor in the onset of ectopic beats. Only patients who presented ventricular ectopic beats at baseline, showed an increase in their number after surgery, likely related to an arbitrary interruption of the specific treatment. These data confirm the safety and efficacy of ropivacaine HCl used as a local anesthetic in patients with myotonic dystrophy.

Bachmann bundle pacing reduces atrial electromechanical delay in type 1 myotonic dystrophy patients.

BACKGROUND: Atrial electromechanical delay (AEMD) is an echocardiographic parameter correlated with the onset of supraventricular arrhythmias in several clinical conditions. Inter-atrial septal pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle (BB) has been shown to be safe and feasible in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) patients, with a low rate of sensing and pacing defects. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of temporary BB pacing compared with right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing on AEMD in DM1 patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation for cardiac rhythm abnormalities. METHODS: The study enrolled 70 consecutive DM1 patients undergoing PM implantation for cardiac rhythm abnormalities in accordance with the current guidelines. Seventy age- and sex-matched non-DM1 patients undergoing dual-chamber PM implantation for cardiac rhythm abnormalities were used as controls. The atrial pacing lead was temporarily positioned in the RAA and on the right side of the inter-atrial septum in the region of Bachmann's bundle. For each site (BB and RAA), temporary atrial pacing in the AAI mode was established at 10 beats per minute above the sinus rate and a detailed trans-thoracic echocardiogram with tissue Doppler (TDI) analysis was recorded after at least 10 min of atrial pacing to evaluate AEMD. RESULTS: Temporary RAA pacing did not show statistically significant differences in inter-AEMD (48.2 ± 17.8 vs 50.5 ± 16.5 ms; P = 0.8), intra-left AEMD (43.3 ± 15.5 vs 44.6 ± 15.8 ms; P = 0.1), or intra-right-AEMD (14.1 ± 4.2 vs 15.4 ± 5.8 ms; P = 0.9), in comparison with sinus rhythm. Temporary BB pacing determined a significantly lower inter-AEMD (36.1 ± 17.1 vs 50.5 ± 16.5 ms; P = 0.001) and intra-left AEMD (32.5 ± 15.2 vs 44.6 ± 15.8 ms; P = 0.001) values in comparison with temporary RAA pacing. No statistically significant difference was found in intra-right AEMD (12.2 ± 4.6 vs 15.4 ± 5.8 ms; P = 0.2). In the control group, neither temporary RAA pacing nor temporary BB pacing showed statistically significant differences in inter-AEMD, intra-left AEMD, or intra-right AEMD values in comparison with sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: In DM1 patients undergoing dual-chamber PM implantation, atrial pacing in the Bachmann bundle region is associated with significantly lower echocardiographic indices of atrial electromechanical delay (inter-AEMD and intra-left AEMD) in comparison with RAA pacing.

Integrated care of muscular dystrophies in Italy. Part 2. Psychological treatments, social and welfare support, and financial costs.

This paper describes the psycho-social treatments received by 502 patients with MDs and their relatives, and the costs for care sustained by the families in the previous six month period. Data were collected by the MD-Care Schedule (MD-CS) and the Family Problems Questionnaire (FPQ). Psycho-educational interventions were provided to 72 patients (14.3%), and social/welfare support to 331 patients (65.9%). Social/welfare support was higher in patients with DMD or LGMD, in those showing more severe disability, and in patients who were in contact with centres located in Northern Italy. Psycho-educational interventions were received by 156 (31%) relatives, and social/welfare support by 55 (10.9%) and mainly provided by Family/Patients Associations (83.6%). Relatives with higher educational levels, who spent more daily hours in the assistance of patients with DMD, and in contact with centres in Central Italy more frequently benefited from psycho-educational interventions. In the previous year, costs for care were sustained by 314 (63.9%) relatives. Financial difficulties related to patient's condition, were higher in families of patients who needed more intensive rehabilitation and daily hours of caregiving, and in families who lived further away from the reference's centre. These results showed that psycho-social aspects of MDs care are only partially met in Italy, and that ad hoc supportive interventions for these patients and their families should be potentiated.

Integrated care of muscular dystrophies in Italy. Part 1. Pharmacological treatment and rehabilitative interventions.

This paper describes the pharmacological therapies and rehabilitative interventions received by 502 patients with Muscular Dystrophies, evaluated in relation to patient's socio-demographic and clinical variables, and geographical areas. Data were collected by the MD-Socio-Demographic and Clinical Schedule (MD-SC-CS) and by the Family Problems Questionnaire (FPQ). The most part of the enrolled patients were in drug treatment. The number of the medications increased in relation to patient's age, disability degree and duration of illness and was higher among patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) compared with Becker (BMD) or Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies (LGMD). Steroids (deflazacort or prednisone) were the drug most frequently used, followed by cardiologic and bone metabolism drugs. In general, patients using steroids were younger and had a shorter duration of illness; patients using cardiac drugs and dietary supplements were older and had a longer duration of illness. Rehabilitative interventions were provided to about 70% (351/502) of patients, mainly DMD. Of these, physiotherapy was the more frequent treatment (96.6%) and was prevalently performed in rehabilitative centres (about 70% of patients) and at home in only 30%. Hydrokinetic-therapy was practiced by 6.8% of patients. Respiratory rehabilitation was provided to 47.0% of patients (165/351) and assisted mechanical ventilaventilation to 13.1% (46). The amount of rehabilitative interventions increased in relation to the patient's age, level of disability and duration of illness. Compared to Central and Northern Italy, in Southern Italy there was a higher attention to cardiological impairment as shown by a higher number of patients receiving heart drugs. No statistically significant differences concerning the possibility to have access to rehabilitative interventions were noted among the three geographical areas. However, patient living in Southern Italy tend to receive rehabilitation more often at home.

Risk of arrhythmias in myotonic dystrophy: trial design of the RAMYD study.

OBJECTIVE: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most frequent muscular dystrophy in adults. DM1 is a multisystem disorder also affecting the heart with an increased incidence of sudden death, which has been explained with the common impairment of the conduction system often requiring pacemaker implantation; however, the occurrence of sudden death despite pacemaker implantation and the observation of major ventricular arrhythmias generated the hypothesis that ventricular arrhythmias may play a causal role as well. The aim of the study was to assess the 2-year cumulative incidence and the value of noninvasive and invasive findings as predictive factors for sudden death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia and severe sinus dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block. METHODS/DESIGN: More than 500 DM1 patients will be evaluated at baseline with a clinical interview, 12-lead ECG, 24-h ECG and echocardiogram. Conventional and nonconventional indications to electrophysiological study, pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator or loop recorder implantation have been developed. In the case of an indication to electrophysiological study, pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator or loop recorder implant at baseline or at follow-up, the patient will be referred for the procedure. At the end of 2-year follow-up, all candidate prognostic factors will be tested for their association with the endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00127582. CONCLUSION: The available evidence supports the hypothesis that both bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias may cause sudden death in DM1, but the course of cardiac disease in DM1 is still unclear. We expect that this large, prospective, multicenter study will provide evidence to improve diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in DM1.