Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 6(1): 201-207, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28863944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse reactions to local anesthetics (LAs), especially esters, are not uncommon, but true allergy is rarely diagnosed. To our knowledge, currently there is no reliable method of determining IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to LAs and cocaine. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical value of allergy tests (prick, IgE, challenges, and arrays) in people suffering hypersensitivity reactions (asthma and anaphylaxis) during local anesthesia with cocaine derivatives and drug abusers with allergic symptoms after cocaine inhalation. METHODS: We selected cocaine-dependent patients and allergic patients who suffered severe reactions during local anesthesia from a database of 23,873 patients. The diagnostic yield (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value) of allergy tests using cocaine and coca leaf extracts in determining cocaine allergy was assessed, taking a positive challenge as the criterion standard. RESULTS: After prick tests, specific IgE, and challenge with cocaine extract, 41 of 211 patients (19.4%) were diagnosed as sensitized to cocaine. Prick tests and IgE to coca leaves (coca tea) had a good sensitivity (95.1% and 92.7%, respectively) and specificity (92.3 and 98.8%, respectively) for the diagnosis of cocaine allergy and LA-derived allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Cocaine may be an important allergen. Drug abusers and patients sensitized to local anesthesia and tobacco are at risk. Both prick tests and specific IgE against coca leaf extract detected sensitization to cocaine. The highest levels were related to severe clinical profiles.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Anestésicos Locales/inmunología , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/diagnóstico , Cocaína/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Coca , Cocaína/análogos & derivados , Cocaína/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización , Inmunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Extractos Vegetales/inmunología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Cutáneas , Adulto Joven
3.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 109(3): 215-9, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22920078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) has been demonstrated to be an excellent new tool for improving the current diagnosis of allergies, and it allows differentiation between polysensitization and cross-reactivity. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the role of cross-reactive pollen allergens in pediatric patients living in areas with large amounts of airborne grass pollen grains who are sensitive to grass pollen and latex. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 106 children between 3 and 14 years of age diagnosed with allergies to pollen based on clinical history, skin prick tests, and specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). None of them had allergy symptoms to latex or fruits. From these 106 children, 56 patients revealed positive results to Phleum-specific major allergens but not to cross-reactive allergens. The other 50 patients who showed positive specific IgE to Phleum-specific major allergens and to cross-reactive pollen allergens also showed positive results to latex allergens. CRD was carried out by specific IgE quantification using a fluoro-enzyme immunoassay (ImmunoCAPT System). RESULTS: Results demonstrated a positive significant relationship between the specific IgE to Hev b 8 and Phl p 12 and also between the specific IgE to Hev b 8 and latex extract in the group of patients sensitized to species-specific and cross-reactive Phleum allergens. Positive significant relationships were also found between profilin and avocado or peach sensitizations. No other latex allergens gave positive results. CONCLUSION: The apparent sensitization to latex in pediatric patients allergic to grass pollen is caused by the cross-reactive profilin panallergen; however, it is appears not to be clinically relevant.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/etiología , Látex/inmunología , Poaceae/inmunología , Polen/inmunología , Profilinas/inmunología , Adolescente , Alérgenos/inmunología , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Reacciones Cruzadas/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/inmunología , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA