Alterations in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue insulin sensitivity in men with HIV infection and dyslipidemia.

Dyslipidemia is common in patients with HIV infection. In this study, a two-stage euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, with infusion of stable isotopically labeled tracers, was used to evaluate insulin action in skeletal muscle, liver, and adipose tissue in HIV-infected men with dyslipidemia (HIV-DL; plasma triglyceride >250 mg/dl and HDL <45 mg/dl; n=12), HIV-infected men without dyslipidemia (HIV w/o DL; n=12), and healthy men (n=6). Basal rates of glucose production (glucose R(a)), glucose disposal (glucose R(d)), and lipolysis (palmitate R(a)) were similar between groups. The relative suppression of glucose R(a) (63+/- 4, 77+/- 2, and 78+/- 3%, P=0.008) and palmitate R(a) (49+/-4, 63+/-3, and 68+/-3%, P=0.005) during ow-dose insulin infusion (plasma insulin approximately 30 microU/ml), and the relative stimulation of glucose R(d) (214+/-21, 390+/-25, and 393+/-46%, P=0.001) during high-dose insulin infusion (plasma insulin approximately 75 microU/ml) were lower in HIV-DL than in HIV w/o DL and healthy volunteers, respectively. Suppression of basal glucose R(a) correlated with plasma adiponectin (r=0.44, P=0.02) and inversely with plasma IL-6 (r=-0.49, P<0.001). Stimulation of glucose R(d) correlated directly with adiponectin (r=0.48, P<0.01) and inversely with IL-6 (r=-0.49, P=0.02). We conclude that dyslipidemia in HIV-infected men is indicative of multiorgan insulin resistance, and circulating adipokines may be important in the pathogenesis of impaired insulin action.

Amphotericin B oral suspension for fluconazole-refractory oral candidiasis in persons with HIV infection. Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study Team 295.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B oral suspension (ABOS) for the treatment of fluconazole refractory oral candidiasis in persons with HIV infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, multicenter, open label trial at 25 study centers within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individuals with diffuse oral candidiasis after 14 days of treatment with 200 mg of fluconazole daily (more than five plaques or a single plaque > 3 cm largest length) were treated with ABOS, 100 mg/ml, 5 ml swish and swallow, four times daily for 14 days. Thereafter incomplete or non-responders received an additional 14 days of therapy and responders received maintenance ABOS twice daily for up to 6 months. Relapses during maintenance ABOS were treated by increasing the dose to four times daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To demonstrate an ABOS clinical response rate > 33% and a treatment-limiting toxicity rate < 50%. Clinical response was defined as the absence of mouth pain and the presence of less than five oral plaques, the largest being < 3 cm largest dimension. RESULTS: Fifty-eight subjects with a median age of 39 years and a median CD4 count of 10 x 10(6) cells/l were enrolled. Four subjects were excluded from the analysis because of inadequate follow-up after randomization (n = 3) or the presence of active esophageal disease (n = 1). Of the remaining 54 subjects, 23 (42.6%; 95% lower confidence interval, 31.1%) were classified as responders after 28 days. Five subjects (9%) stopped treatment due to toxicity. Relapse occurred in 16 responders (70%). CONCLUSIONS: Amphotericin B oral suspension is well tolerated but has limited efficacy for the treatment of fluconazole refractory oral candidiasis.

Clarithromycin or rifabutin alone or in combination for primary prophylaxis of Mycobacterium avium complex disease in patients with AIDS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group 196/Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS 009 Protocol Team.

The efficacy and safety of clarithromycin and rifabutin alone and in combination for prevention of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease were compared in 1178 patients with AIDS who had < or =100 CD4 T cells/microL in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. MAC disease occurred in 9%, 15%, and 7% of those randomized to clarithromycin or rifabutin alone or in combination, respectively; time-adjusted event rates per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 6.3 (4.2-8.3), 10.5 (7.8-13.2), and 4. 7 (2.9-6.5). Risk of MAC disease was reduced by 44% with clarithromycin (risk ratio [RR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.84; P=.005) and by 57% with combination therapy (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.69; P=. 0003), versus rifabutin. Combination therapy was not more effective than clarithromycin (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.31; P=.36). Of those in whom clarithromycin or combination therapy failed, 29% and 27% of MAC isolates, respectively, were resistant to clarithromycin. There were no survival differences. Clarithromycin and combination therapy were more effective than rifabutin for prevention of MAC disease, but combination therapy was associated with more adverse effects (31%; P<.001).

Oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with HIV: suggested guidelines for therapy.

The high frequency of oropharyngeal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients has led many institutions to develop protocols to guide the use of antifungal agents in the treatment of this opportunistic infection. However, few specific recommendations have been made for directing the management of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients infected with HIV. To meet this need, a panel of experts representing a variety of disciplines met to formulate a consensus and devise a treatment strategy for clinical application. Among other recommendations, the algorithm calls for use of a topical agent for the treatment of initial and recurring oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients, provided there is no esophageal involvement, patients' CD4+ lymphocyte cell count is >50 cells/mm3, and they are currently receiving or expected to receive effective antiretroviral treatment. For episodes of oropharyngeal candidiasis with concurrent esophageal involvement or where patients have a CD4+ cell count of <50 cells/mm3, are not receiving or anticipating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and have a high viral load, the algorithm suggests a systemic oral azole as the more appropriate treatment choice. Acute treatment of all oropharyngeal candidiasis episodes is preferred. Chronic suppressive antifungal treatment is to be avoided in recognition of the potential for the development of drug-resistant infection.

A phase II/III trial of antimicrobial therapy with or without amikacin in the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in HIV-infected individuals. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 135 Study Team.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and microbiologic benefit of adding amikacin to a four-drug oral regimen for treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: A randomized, open-labeled, comparative trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: Seventy-four patients with HIV and symptomatic bacteremic M. avium infection. INTERVENTIONS: Rifampin 10 mg/kg daily, ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily, clofazimine 100 mg every day, and ethambutol 15 mg/kg orally daily for 24 weeks, with or without amikacin 10 mg/kg intravenously or intramuscularly 5 days weekly for the first 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical and microbiologic response at 4 weeks; quantitative level of bacteremia with M. avium. RESULTS: No difference in clinical response was noted with the addition of amikacin to the four-drug oral regimen, and only 25% in either group had a complete or partial response at 4 weeks. A comparable quantitative decrease in bacteremia was noted in both treatment groups, with 16% of patients being culture-negative at 4 weeks and 38% at 12 weeks. Toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal. Amikacin was well tolerated. Median survival was 30 weeks in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of amikacin to a four-drug oral regimen of rifampin, ciprofloxacin, clofazimine, and ethambutol did not provide clinical or microbiologic benefit.

Coccidioidomycosis.

AIDS: Coccidioides immitis is a dimorphic fungus primarily found in the soil in a limited region of the southwestern United States. When this fungus causes an infection (coccidioidomycosis), it is due to the spores being inhaled and causing an inflammation of the respiratory tract. In most cases, the infection is self-limiting and is controlled by cell-mediated immunity. In HIV-infected patients, it is thought that the infection may be newly acquired, or reactivated, from a former incident. Patients with a CD4 count under 250 are at highest risk for becoming infected, and may present with pneumonia, fever, weight loss, night sweats, cough, and dyspnea. The infection can also become disseminated, and upon autopsy, widespread disease is found in the majority of patients that die of coccidioidomycosis. Chest x-rays show a diffuse reticulonodular infiltrate, then diagnosis is made by culturing the organism. The treatment of choice for disseminated disease is amphotericin B and alternative therapies including itraconazole and fluconazole, with possible lifelong treatment necessary. There is no current evidence that coccidioidomycosis can be prevented by any of these drugs.^ieng

A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with clotrimazole troches for the prevention of fungal infections in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Cryptococcal meningitis and other serious fungal infections are common complications in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Fluconazole is effective for long-term suppression of many fungal infections, but its effectiveness as primary prophylaxis had not been adequately evaluated. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized trial that compared fluconazole (200 mg per day) with clotrimazole troches (10 mg taken five times daily) in patients who were also participating in a randomized trial of primary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 35 months, invasive fungal infections had developed in 4.1 percent of the patients in the fluconazole group (9 of 217) and in 10.9 percent of those in the clotrimazole group (23 of 211; relative hazard, as adjusted for the CD4+ count, 3.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 7.6). Of the 32 invasive fungal infections, 17 were cryptococcosis (2 in the fluconazole group and 15 in the clotrimazole group; adjusted relative hazard, 8.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 37.6). The benefit of fluconazole was greater for the patients with 50 or fewer CD4+ cells per cubic millimeter than for the patients with higher counts. Fluconazole was also effective in preventing esophageal candidiasis (adjusted relative hazard, 5.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 20.0; P = 0.004) and confirmed and presumed oropharyngeal candidiasis (5.7 and 38.1 cases per 100 years of follow-up in the fluconazole and clotrimazole groups, respectively; P < 0.001). Survival was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole taken prophylactically reduces the frequency of cryptococcosis, esophageal candidiasis, and superficial fungal infections in HIV-infected patients, especially those with 50 or fewer CD4+ lymphocytes per cubic millimeter, but the drug does not reduce overall mortality.

The safety and efficacy of combination N-butyl-deoxynojirimycin (SC-48334) and zidovudine in patients with HIV-1 infection and 200-500 CD4 cells/mm3.

We conducted a double-blind, randomized phase II study to evaluate the safety and activity of combination therapy with N-butyl-deoxynojirimycin (SC-48334) (an alpha-glucosidase I inhibitor) and zidovudine versus zidovudine alone. Patients with 200 to 500 CD4 cells/mm3 who tolerated < or = 12 weeks of prior zidovudine therapy received SC-48334 (1000 mg every 8 h) and zidovudine (100 mg every 8 h) or zidovudine and placebo. Sixty patients received combination therapy and 58, zidovudine and placebo. Twenty-three patients (38%) and 15 (26%), in the combination and zidovudine groups, respectively, discontinued therapy (p = 0.15). The mean SC-48334 steady-state trough level (4.04 +/- 0.99 micrograms/ml) was below the in vitro inhibitory concentration for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The mean increase in CD4 cells at week 4 was 73.8 cells/mm3 and 52.4 cells/mm3 for the combination and zidovudine groups, respectively (p > 0.36). For patients with prior zidovudine therapy, the mean change in CD4 cells in the combination and zidovudine groups was 63.7 cells/mm3 and 4.9 cells/mm3 at week 8 and 6.8 cells/mm3 and -45.1 cells/mm3 at week 16, respectively. The number of patients with suppression of HIV p24 antigenemia in the combination and zidovudine groups was six (40%) and two (11%) at week 4 (p = 0.10) and five (45%) and two (14%) at week 24 (p = 0.08), respectively. Diarrhea, flatulence, abdominal pain, and weight loss were common for combination recipients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amphotericin B-resistant yeast infection in severely immunocompromised patients.

Systemic yeast infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in severely immunocompromised patients. The in vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B of 29 yeasts causing fungemia was examined in 26 patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation and/or myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amphotericin B observed with blood isolates from these patients were significantly higher than those observed with blood, sputum, or skin isolates from non-immunocompromised patients (p less than 0.01). All episodes (10 of 10) of bloodstream infection in immunocompromised patients caused by isolates with MICs greater than 0.8 micrograms/ml were fatal, versus eight of 17 episodes of bloodstream infection caused by yeasts with MICs of 0.8 micrograms/ml or less (p = 0.04). Although 15 of 26 patients received empiric treatment with amphotericin B before laboratory evidence of fungemia developed, the amphotericin B susceptibilities of their isolates were not significantly different from those of patients who had not received empiric amphotericin B treatment. It is concluded that yeast fungemia in severely immunocompromised patients is often caused by organisms resistant to the usual concentrations of amphotericin B obtainable in vivo, and that this finding is clinically significant.