Assessment of Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-Osteoporosis Drugs.

The incidence of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease increases with age, and there are potentially shared mechanistic associations between the two conditions. It is therefore highly relevant to understand the cardiovascular implications of osteoporosis medications. These are presented in this narrative review. Calcium supplementation could theoretically cause atheroma formation via calcium deposition, and in one study was found to be associated with myocardial infarction, but this has not been replicated. Vitamin D supplementation has been extensively investigated for cardiac benefit, but no consistent effect has been found. Despite findings in the early 21st century that menopausal hormone therapy was associated with coronary artery disease and venous thromboembolism (VTE), this therapy is now thought to be potentially safe (from a cardiac perspective) if started within the first 10 years of the menopause. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are associated with increased risk of VTE and may be related to fatal strokes (a subset of total strokes). Bisphosphonates could theoretically provide protection against atheroma. However, data from randomised trials and observational studies have neither robustly supported this nor consistently demonstrated the potential association with atrial fibrillation. Denosumab does not appear to be associated with cardiovascular disease and, although parathyroid hormone analogues are associated with palpitations and dizziness, no association with a defined cardiovascular pathology has been demonstrated. Finally, romosozumab has been shown to have a possible cardiovascular signal, and therefore post-market surveillance of this therapy will be vital.

Uso de fármacos para la osteoporosis en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2: estudio de cohortes de base poblacional / Use of drugs for osteoporosis treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: population-based cohort study

Objetivo: Determinar si existen diferencias en la prevalencia del uso de fármacos para la osteoporosis entre pacientes diabéticos tipo 2 (DM2) y no diabéticos. Material y método: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivas con datos del Sistema de Información para el Desarrollo de la Investigación en Atención Primaria (SIDIAP), que contiene información clínica anonimizada de más de 5 millones de pacientes de Cataluña. Se seleccionaron todos los pacientes de ≥50 años de edad con diagnóstico de DM2, que fueron apareados con dos sujetos sin diabetes. Se recogió información sobre variables descriptivas, fracturas prevalentes y el uso de fármacos para la osteoporosis agrupados en bifosfonatos (BF), suplementos calcio y vitamina D (CaD), y cualquier fármaco para la osteoporosis (FPO). Mediante regresión logística se calculó la asociación entre la presencia de DM2 y el uso de FPO, ajustando por variables confusoras. Resultados: Se identificaron 166.106 pacientes con DM2 y 332.212 no diabéticos. Los DM2 tenían mayor prevalencia de fractura que los no diabéticos (1,3% vs. 0,3%). El uso de BF en los pacientes con DM2 era del 6,6%, frente al 9,3% en los no diabéticos (p<0,001); de CaD, 9,7% vs. 12,3% (p<0,001); y de FPO, 7,6% vs. 10,7% (p<0,001). Tras ajustar por variables confusoras, los pacientes con DM2 presentaban menor probabilidad de ser tratados con BF (OR=0,67; IC95%: 0,64-0,68), con CaD (OR=0,71; IC95%: 0,70-0,73) o con FPO (OR=0,66; IC95%: 0,64-0,67) que los no diabéticos. Conclusiones: A pesar de presentar una mayor prevalencia de fracturas previas, los pacientes con DM2 tienen más del 30% de probabilidad de no recibir un FPO que los no diabéticos. Esto podría ser debido a una infravaloración del riesgo en estos pacientes (AU)

Objective: Ascertain whether there are differences in the prevalence of osteoporosis drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and non-diabetic patients. Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study with data from the Information System for the Development of Primary Care Research (SIDIAP), which contains anonymous clinical information from more than 5 million patients in Catalonia. All 50-year-old patients diagnosed with DM2, who were matched with two subjects without diabetes, were selected. Information on descriptive variables, prevalent fractures and the use of osteoporosis drugs grouped in bisphosphonates (BF), calcium and vitamin D supplements (CaD), and any osteoporosis drug (OD) were collected. Through logistic regression, the association between the presence of DM2 and the use of OD was calculated, adjusting for confounding variables. Results: A total of 166,106 patients with DM2 and 332,212 non-diabetics. The DM2 group presented a higher prevalence of fracture than did diabetics (1.3% vs 0.3%). The use of BF in patients with DM2 was 6.6%, compared to 9.3% in non-diabetics (p<0.001). Of CaD, 9.7% vs 12.3% (p<0.001) and OD, 7.6% vs 10.7% (p<0.001). After adjusting for variable confounders, the patients with DM2 presented a lower probability of being treated with BF (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.64-0.68), with CaD (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.70-0.73) or with OD (OR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.64-0.67) than non-diabetics. Conclusions: Despite having a higher prevalence of fractures in patients with DM2, they have more than 30% chance of not having received an OD than non-diabetic patients. This may be attributed to an underestimation of risk in these patients (AU)

International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Calcified Tissue Society Working Group. Recommendations for the screening of adherence to oral bisphosphonates.

Adherence to oral bisphosphonates is low. A screening strategy is proposed based on the response of biochemical markers of bone turnover after 3 months of therapy. If no change is observed, the clinician should reassess the adherence to the treatment and also other potential issues with the drug. INTRODUCTION: Low adherence to oral bisphosphonates is a common problem that jeopardizes the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. No clear screening strategy for the assessment of compliance is widely accepted in these patients. METHODS: The International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society have convened a working group to propose a screening strategy to detect a lack of adherence to these drugs. The question to answer was whether the bone turnover markers (BTMs) PINP and CTX can be used to identify low adherence in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis initiating oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. The findings of the TRIO study specifically address this question and were used as the basis for testing the hypothesis. RESULTS: Based on the findings of the TRIO study, specifically addressing this question, the working group recommends measuring PINP and CTX at baseline and 3 months after starting therapy to check for a decrease above the least significant change (decrease of more than 38% for PINP and 56% for CTX). Detection rate for the measurement of PINP is 84%, for CTX 87% and, if variation in at least one is considered when measuring both, the level of detection is 94.5%. CONCLUSIONS: If a significant decrease is observed, the treatment can continue, but if no decrease occurs, the clinician should reassess to identify problems with the treatment, mainly low adherence.

CYP11A1 expression in bone is associated with aromatase inhibitor-related bone loss.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) used as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer cause diverse musculoskeletal side effects that include bone loss and its associated fracture. About half of the 391 patients treated with AIs in the Barcelona-Aromatase induced bone loss in early breast cancer cohort suffered a significant bone loss at lumbar spine (LS) and/or femoral neck (FN) after 2 years on AI-treatment. In contrast, up to one-third (19.6% LS, 38.6% FN) showed no decline or even increased bone density. The present study aimed to determine the genetic basis for this variability. SNPs in candidate genes involved in vitamin D and estrogen hormone-response pathways (CYP11A1, CYP17A1, HSD3B2, HSD17B3, CYP19A1, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, ESR1, DHCR7, GC, CYP2R1, CYP27B1, VDR and CYP24A1) were genotyped for association analysis with AI-related bone loss (AIBL). After multiple testing correction, 3 tag-SNPs (rs4077581, s11632698 and rs900798) located in the CYP11A1 gene were significantly associated (P<0.005) with FN AIBL at 2 years of treatment. Next, CYP11A1 expression in human fresh bone tissue and primary osteoblasts was demonstrated by RT-PCR. Both common isoforms of human cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (encoded by CYP11A1 gene) were detected in osteoblasts by western blot. In conclusion, the genetic association of CYP11A1 gene with AIBL and its expression in bone tissue reveals a potential local function of this enzyme in bone metabolism regulation, offering a new vision of the steroidogenic ability of this tissue and new understanding of AI-induced bone loss.

Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D deficiency in non-supplemented women with systemic lupus erythematosus in the Mediterranean region: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Over the past few years researchers have suggested that vitamin D plays a diverse role in autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We sought to determine the prevalence and predictors of vitamin D deficiency in a cohort of non-supplemented female SLE patients from the Mediterranean region. METHODS: We carried out a prospective cohort study on all SLE patients who had visited the Department of Rheumatology at the Parc de Salut MAR (Barcelona, Spain) between June 2007 and December 2008, excluding those who had been taking vitamin D supplements (total: 73 patients, all female). For each patient, demographic information was collected; scores were measured for disease severity [SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)] and structural damage [Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic/American College of Rheumatology, (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index]; pharmacological treatment was recorded; analytical variables were analysed; and plasma levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] were quantified. RESULTS: Among the patients in our cohort, 68.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60.3-79.2] exhibited vitamin D deficiency [plasma level of 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL]. The predictors for vitamin D deficiency were daily sunscreen use [odds ratio (OR) 1.67, p = 0.02] and high body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.32 when adjusted for seasons and patient age, p = 0.04). We did not find any correlation between vitamin D deficiency and SLEDAI score (p = 0.31), SLICC/ACR score (p = 0.82), or any other of the variables. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D insufficiency is highly prevalent among SLE patients, even in southern regions. Sunscreen use and obesity increase the risk. Clinicians should be aware of these factors and supplement SLE patients at risk of vitamin D deficiency accordingly.