Asunto(s)
Terapia Biológica , COVID-19 , Psoriasis/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , ItaliaRESUMEN
AIM: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder affecting approximately 2% of the population worldwide. Because of its visible manifestations and symptoms, psoriasis has profound effects on quality of life (QoL). Our objective is to determine the clinical severity of psoriasis and its impact on QoL in patients treated with phototherapy, traditional systemic therapy and biological therapy. METHODS: Patients with plaque-type psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were recruited at a PsoCare centre and followed up for 6 months. Psoriasis severity was assessed based on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score and QoL using the SKINDEX-29 questionnaire. RESULTS: PASI score improved significantly in all patients after 6 months of therapy. The greatest improvement was observed in patients receiving biological treatments. PASI-75 was obtained by 46.9% of patients on phototherapy and 43.1% on biological therapies. Skindex-29 results did not significantly differ among the three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Effective management of patients with psoriasis depends on the appropriate assessment of both the physical and psychosocial impact of the disease.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Terapia PUVA , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Acitretina/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Emociones , Etanercept , Femenino , Ácido Fólico/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Infliximab , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/patología , Psoriasis/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment is one of the most effective procedures for patients with non-aesthetic vascular lesions in addition to signs of skin photoageing, and it has been reported as very successful in the treatment of telangiectasias, spider nevi, erythrosis, and above all, rosacea and poikiloderma. Its use is based on the principle of selective photothermolysis, which exploits the haemoglobin absorption peak among its range of wavelengths. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in treating non-aesthetic vascular skin lesions, especially with regard to poikiloderma of Civatte and rosacea. METHODS: A total of eighty-five patients, 64 women and 21 men, with 63 non-aesthetic vascular lesions (28 Poikiloderma of Civatte and 35 rosacea), 22 pigmented lesions (UV-related hyperpigmentation of solar lentigo-type) and four precancerous lesions (actinic keratosis, AKs), were treated repeatedly with IPL for 2 years. The patients received a mean of five treatments (range 4-6) at 3-weekly intervals. They were evaluated via clinical observations and professional photographs were taken before each treatment and after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The outcome of the IPL treatments was evaluated by four independent dermatologists, who were not informed about the study protocol, and who assessed the performance of IPL by dividing the results into four categories: no results, slight improvement, moderate improvement and marked improvement. RESULTS: All the patients showed improvements in their overall lesions: 72 lesions (80.9%) achieved a marked improvement, 14 lesions (15.7%) achieved a moderate improvement and three lesions (3.4%) achieved a slight improvement. The results of the 63 non-aesthetic vascular lesions in Rosacea and Poikiloderma of Civatte were: 51 with a marked improvement, 10 with moderate improvement, whereas only two lesions achieved a slight improvement. The improvement of all four actinic keratoses was marked whereas the 22 pigmented lesions obtained a marked improvement in 17 cases, a moderate improvement in four cases and a slight improvement in one case. No undesirable effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms how by minimizing side-effects, time and costs, IPL can be effective and safe for the treatment of non-aesthetic facial and neck vascular lesions.
Asunto(s)
Cara , Cuello , Fototerapia , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study is a retrospective analysis evaluating the presence of comorbidities, as well as the changes in body weight and clinical parameters in psoriasis patients following treatment with anti-TNF-alpha agents and with the anti-CD11a agent efalizumab. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 268 patients affected by chronic plaque psoriasis, and receiving systemic monotherapy with efalizumab, etanercept, or infliximab, were included. The follow-up period was 2, 4 and 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical data including age, gender, weight, type and severity of psoriasis and age of onset were collected. Severity of psoriasis was assessed according to the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA). RESULTS: Hypertension and hyperlipidaemia were the comorbidities present with the higher frequency in our group of patients. PASI score was reduced by between 43.8 and 52% in all treatment groups. No relevant blood chemistry changes were observed following therapy, with the exception of a decrease in neutrophils and an increase in leukocyte numbers reported in the efalizumab and etanercept groups. Interestingly, after 6 months of therapy, the weight of the patients remained unvaried in those taking efalizumab (-0.05%) but was moderately increased in the etanercept (+0.72%) and in infliximab groups (+0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that there were clinically significant differences in weight gain effects between efalizumab and anti-TNF-alpha agents in psoriatic patients. The changes in body weight gain increase did not reach statistical significance, although there is a trend towards this, and this may be due to the relatively small number of patient studied.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Biológica , Biomarcadores/análisis , Peso Corporal , Psoriasis/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Peso Corporal/fisiología , Comorbilidad , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Etanercept , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Infliximab , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Psoriasis/fisiopatología , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pruritus is an important symptom in psoriasis vulgaris, may be severe and seriously affect the quality of life of patients, but published data on its frequency and characteristics are limited. OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to characterize the prevalence of itch in psoriatic patients and the effect of treatment modalities by using a comprehensive itch questionnaire of own design. METHODS: A structured itch questionnaire was given to 90 patients with moderate to severe chronic-plaque psoriasis selected consecutively from the patients visiting the Department of Dermatology of the University of Florence. The questionnaire concerned the areas involved psoriasis and pruritus, the pruritus characteristics, the worsening and relieving factors and treatment modalities. Itch intensity was reflected by a 10 point visual analog scale (VAS) and the degree of symptoms discriminated between mild (1-3), moderate (4-7) and severe (8-10). RESULTS: Almost 85% of psoriatic patients suffered from itching; the frequency of pruritus was daily and mean intensity by VAS scale was moderate. Presence and intensity of pruritus and body mass index (BMI) were correlated. 40% of patients with pruritus were overweight (BMI > 25 < 30) and 10% obese (BMI > 30). Almost all patients appeared unsatisfied with the available treatment modalities for pruritus in psoriasis. Emollients, topical steroids and calcipotriol cream could relieve pruritus but their effect was temporary. Among the antipsoriatic therapies, phototherapy with narrow band ultraviolet B (nb-UVB) was the most effective treatment in reducing pruritus. Biological therapies, mainly etanercept and efalizumab, proved useful in its control. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire was a useful tool to characterize itch, and the results might help us to better understand pruritus in psoriasis. The results confirmed the need for a global study of psoriasis with regard to both the cutaneous manifestations and the itch symptom.