Impact of long-acting muscarinic antagonists on small airways in asthma and COPD: A systematic review.

Small airway disease is recognized as a cardinal pathological process of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and recently small airways have been recognized as a major site of airflow obstruction also in asthmatic patients. The transversal involvement of small airways in COPD and asthma has warranted research efforts to identify therapeutic strategies able to unlock the small airway compartment. The mainstay of COPD treatment is represented by long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs). In asthma, the efficacy of LAMAs administered add-on to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or ICS/LABA combinations has been investigated only in recent years. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the current literature concerning the impact of LAMAs on small airways and their lung deposition in both COPD and asthma. LAMAs administered either alone or in combination induced an effective bronchorelaxant effect of small airways, however the effectiveness of respiratory medications not only relies on the selected drug, but also on the employed inhalation device and patient's adherence. Tiotropium delivered via Respimat® SMI achieved a superior drug deposition in the peripheral lung compared to HandiHaler® dry powder inhaler and metered-dose inhalers (MDIs). The use of co-suspension™ delivery technology for MDIs and the introduction of the eFlow® nebulizer to deliver glycopyrronium improved aerosol drug delivery to the peripheral lung, by achieving uniform distribution of drug particles. This systematic review provides a synthesis of current literature concerning the impact of LAMAs on small airways and an insight on LAMAs distribution within the lung.

Efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an expert review.

Introduction: The current recommendations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) suggest to escalate from inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonist (ICS/LABA) treatment to triple therapy in patients experiencing persistent breathlessness, exercise limitation, or exacerbation. The addition of an ICS to LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) combination is recommended for frequently exacerbating patients with high levels of blood eosinophils. Nowadays, three triple therapies have been approved as fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for the treatment of COPD: beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide (BDP/FOR/GLY), fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI), and budesonide/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FOR).Areas covered: This narrative review evaluates the efficacy and safety profile of triple FDC therapy for the treatment of COPD, by evaluating the data originating from pivotal randomized-controlled trials (RCTs).Expert opinion: The currently approved triple FDCs exert a protective effect against the risk of COPD exacerbation compared to ICS/LABA and LABA/LAMA, with some concerns regarding the risk of pneumonia for some specific FDCs. Since the assessed RCTs were characterized by important confounders, the obtained results should be interpreted with caution. Indeed, FDCs provide advantages in terms of improved adherence to treatment and lower errors in COPD management; however, direct head-to-head comparisons are needed to establish real differences between the currently approved triple FDCs.

Efficacy and cardiovascular safety profile of dual bronchodilation therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A bidimensional comparative analysis across fixed-dose combinations.

Despite several long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are currently approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there are limited findings concerning the direct comparison across the different LABA/LAMA FDCs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy/safety profile of approved LABA/LAMA FDCs in COPD. A network meta-analysis was performed by linking the efficacy (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, St' George Respiratory Questionnaire, transitional dyspnea index) and safety (cardiovascular serious adverse events) outcomes resulting from randomized controlled trials that directly compared LABA/LAMA FDCs with placebo and/or each other. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve Analysis (SUCRA) was performed for each single outcome (SUCRA: 1 = best, 0 = worst). The combined efficacy/safety profile was reported via the novel Improved Bidimensional SUCRA score (IBiS: the higher the value the better the treatment). Data obtained from 12,136 COPD patients (79.50% LABA/LAMA FDCs vs. placebo; 20.50% direct comparison between different LABA/LAMA FDCs) were extracted from 22 studies published between 2013 and 2019. The IBiS score showed the following rank of efficacy/safety profile: tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg (area 66.83%) ¼ glycopyrronium/indacaterol 15.6/27.5 µg (area 40.43%)  >  umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 µg (area 30.48%)  ≈  aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 µg (area 28.44%)  >  glycopyrronium/indacaterol 50/110 µg (area 19.95%)  >  glycopyrronium/formoterol 14.4/9.6 µg (area 11.50%). Each available LABA/LAMA FDC has a specific efficacy/safety profile that needs to be considered for personalized therapy in COPD. Head-to-head studies aimed to assess the impact of different LABA/LAMA FDCs on the risk of COPD exacerbation are needed to further improve the information provided by this quantitative synthesis.

A potential role of triple therapy for asthma patients.

Introduction: The use of LAMAs in asthma is now supported by pharmacological and clinical evidence, whereas the effectiveness of therapy with ICS/LABA/LAMA fixed dose combinations in patients with asthma still remains to be determined. Areas covered: The pharmacological rationale that explains why it is possible to use triple therapy in asthma and the results of clinical studies that have explored the effects of this therapy in asthmatics is critically examined. A systematic search was conducted on 10 August 2019, and included six electronic databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Expert opinion: The real role of single inhaler triple therapy in asthma will be demonstrated when the various trials that are currently ongoing or are scheduled will be completed. We believe that it is appropriate to treat with triple therapy asthmatic patients who have smoked and remain symptomatic or suffer from frequent exacerbations despite initial inhaler therapy with ICS/LABA. However, we must establish when to step up or mainly step down triple therapy especially in patients who are well controlled, and what will be the cost of these combinations in the management of asthma.

A safety comparison of LABA+LAMA vs LABA+ICS combination therapy for COPD.

INTRODUCTION: LABA+LAMA and LABA+ICS combinations are key pharmacological approaches to the treatment of COPD. However, both combination types can induce adverse events (AEs). AREAS COVERED: Current literature on LABA+LAMA and LABA+ICS combinations has been reviewed with a specific focus on their safety profile in the treatment of COPD. EXPERT OPINION: Several meta-analyses have compared the pooled safety data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of LABA+LAMA combinations with LABA+ICS combinations. LABA+LAMA caused significantly less AEs and SAEs. However, this evidence in real life is less solid because of the lack of appropriate studies. A statistically significant reduction in the risk for pneumonia with LABA+LAMA compared with LABA+ICS has been repeatedly documented by various meta-analyses. The meta-analytic signal indicates that an equal number of patients would die or have cardiac SAEs on LABA+LAMA or LABA+ICS, and in an observational, real-life study the LABA+LAMA combination had similar or lower risk of these events in comparison to LABA+ICS. Nonetheless, since RCTs are conducted under widely varying conditions and, consequently, AE rates of a drug observed in a RCT cannot be directly compared with rates in the RCTs of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice, we need more specific data.

LABA/LAMA combination in COPD: a meta-analysis on the duration of treatment.

When there are no randomised clinical trials directly comparing all relevant treatment options, an indirect treatment comparison via meta-analysis of the available clinical evidence is an acceptable alternative. However, meta-analyses may be very misleading if not adequately performed. Here, we propose and validate a simple and effective approach to meta-analysis for exploring the effectiveness of long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.14 articles with 20 329 patients (combinations n=9292; monocomponents n=11 037) were included in this study. LABA/LAMA combinations were always more effective than the monocomponents in terms of the improvement in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s, transition dyspnoea index and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. No significant publication bias was identified. Significant discrepancies with previous network meta-analyses have been found, with overall differences ranging from 26.7% to 43.3%.Results from previous network meta-analyses were misleading because no adequate attention was given to formulating the review question, specifying eligibility criteria, correctly identifying studies, collecting appropriate information and deciding what it would be pharmacologically relevant to analyse. The real gradient of effectiveness of LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations remains an unmet medical need; however, it can be investigated indirectly using a high-quality meta-analytic approach.

Olodaterol + tiotropium bromide for the treatment of COPD.

Patients suffering from COPD not controlled by a single bronchodilator should be given two bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action. Addition of a LABA to a LAMA induces a larger bronchodilation than that obtained with the LAMA as monotherapy and also improves many patient-reported outcomes. Since the clinical-functional sign regarding simultaneous use of tiotropium, which is still the dominant LAMA, and olodaterol was very strong, the combination of these two bronchodilators has been developed as FDC delivered via a single inhaler (Respimat) with the aim of simplifying the treatment regimen and improving patient adherence to treatment. The large TOviTO program of Phase III clinical trials that is involving more than 15,000 patients with different levels of COPD severity worldwide and includes several clinical studies is documenting the efficacy and safety of tiotropium/olodaterol FDC as maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.