Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMJ Open ; 9(2): e024561, 2019 02 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30782909

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The dramatic increase of the incidence of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) has led to an increase of 50% of carbapenem consumption all around Europe in only 5 years. This favours the spread of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), causing life-threatening infections. In order to limit use of carbapenems for infections actually due to ESBL-PE, health authorities promote the use of rapid diagnostic tests of bacterial resistance. The objective of this work conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) is to determine whether an early de-escalation of empirical carbapenems guided by the result of the ßLACTA test is not inferior to the reference strategy of de-escalating carbapenems after the antibiogram result has been rendered. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre randomised controlled open-label non-inferiority clinical trial will include patients suffering from respiratory and/or urinary and/or bloodstream infections documented with GNB on direct examination and empirically treated with carbapenems. Empirical carbapenems will be adapted before the second dose depending on the results of the ßLACTA test performed directly on the microbiological sample (intervention group) or after 48-72 hours depending on the definite antibiogram (control group). The primary outcome will combine 90-day mortality and percentage of infection recurrence during the ICU stay. The secondary outcomes will include the number of carbapenems defined daily doses and carbapenem-free days after inclusion, the proportion of new infections during ICU stay, new colonisation of patients' digestive tractus with multidrug-resistant GNB, ICU and hospital length of stay and cost-effectiveness ratio. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of Paris-Ile-de-France IV, and will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03147807.


Asunto(s)
Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Deprescripciones , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Resistencia betalactámica , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mortalidad , Recurrencia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas
2.
Crit Care ; 21(1): 161, 2017 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28655352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests detecting microbial resistance are needed for limiting the duration of inappropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) in intensive care unit patients, besides reducing the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We hypothesized that the betaLACTA® test (BLT) could lead to early increase in the adequacy of antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: This was a case-control study. Sixty-one patients with BLT-guided adaptation of EAT were prospectively included, and then matched with 61 "controls" having similar infection characteristics (community or hospital-acquired, and source of infection), in whom EAT was conventionally adapted to antibiogram results. Endpoints were to compare the proportion of appropriate (primary endpoint) and optimal (secondary endpoint) antimicrobial therapies with each of the two strategies, once microbiological sample culture results were available. RESULTS: Characteristics of patients, infections and EAT at inclusion were similar between groups. Nine early escalations of EAT occurred in the BLT-guided adaptation group, reaching 98% appropriateness vs. 77% in the conventional adaptation group (p < 0.01). The BLT reduced the time until escalation of an inappropriate EAT from 50.5 (48-73) to 27 (24-28) hours (p < 0.01). Seventeen early de-escalations occurred in the BLT-guided adaptation group, compared to one in the conventional adaptation group, reducing patients' exposure to broad-spectrum beta-lactam such as carbapenems. In multivariate analysis, use of the BLT was strongly associated with early appropriate (OR = 18 (3.4-333.8), p = 0.006) and optimal (OR = 35.5 (9.6-231.9), p < 0.001) antimicrobial therapies. Safety parameters were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that a BLT-guided adaptation strategy may allow early beta-lactam adaptation from the first 24 hours following the beginning of sepsis management.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/instrumentación , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/farmacología , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA