Achalasia diagnosed despite normal integrated relaxation pressure responds favorably to therapy.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia diagnosis requires elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP; manometric marker of lower esophageal sphincter [LES] relaxation). Yet, some patients exhibit clinical features of achalasia despite normal IRP and have LES dysfunction demonstrable by other means. We hypothesized these patients to exhibit equivalent therapeutic response compared to standard achalasia patients. METHODS: Symptomatic achalasia-like cases, despite normal IRP, displayed evidence of impaired LES relaxation using rapid drink challenge (RDC), solid swallows during high-resolution manometry, and/or barium esophagogram; were treated with achalasia therapies and compared to standard achalasia patients with raised IRP. Outcomes included equivalence for short- and long-term symptom response and stasis on barium esophagogram. KEY RESULTS: Twenty-nine normal IRP achalasia cases (14 males, median age 50 year, median Eckardt 6, barium stasis 12 ± 7 cm) and 29 consecutive standard achalasia controls underwent therapy. Among cases, LES dysfunction was most often identified by RDC and/or barium esophagogram. Short-term symptomatic success was equivalent in cases vs controls (90% vs 93%; 95% CI for difference: -19% to 13%). Median short-term (1 vs 1; 95% CI for difference: 0-1) and long-term Eckardt scores (2 vs 1; 95% CI for difference: 0-2) were similar in cases and controls, respectively. Adequate clearance was observed in 67% of cases vs 81% of controls on post-therapy esophagogram. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: We described a subset of achalasia patients with normal IRP, but impaired LES relaxation identifiable only on additional provocative tests. These patients benefited from treatment, suggesting that such tests should be performed to increase the number of clinically relevant diagnoses.

Efficacy of Percutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Management of Fecal Incontinence in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a debilitating and highly prevalent problem among multiple sclerosis patients. Conservative therapies often fail to provide benefit. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation is a minimally invasive neuromodulatory therapy with proven efficacy for fecal incontinence in non-neurological settings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in treating multiple sclerosis-related fecal incontinence. METHODS: Consecutive multiple sclerosis patients with fecal incontinence that had failed conservative therapy received posterior tibial nerve stimulation between 2012 and 2015. All patients had previously undergone anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasound. Patients whose Wexner incontinence score reduced below 10 post-therapy or halved from baseline were deemed responders. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (25 female, median age 43 years) were included. Twenty-three (70%) had urge, 4 (12%) passive, and 9 (27%) mixed fecal incontinence. Twenty-six (79%) were classified as responders. The majority of subjects had relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (67%); those had a significantly higher response rate (95% vs. 67% and 50% in primary and secondary progressive respectively, P < 0.05). Responders tended to be more symptomatic at baseline and had greater improvements in bowel symptom scores and quality of life scores with therapy. CONCLUSION: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation demonstrates potential as an effective therapy for fecal incontinence in multiple sclerosis. These findings provide the basis for future more definitive controlled studies.

Bowel biofeedback treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis and bowel symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Bowel symptoms are common in patients with multiple sclerosis, but current treatment is empirical. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify effect of biofeedback on bowel symptoms, mood, and anorectal physiology in patients with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study: the amount of change between pre- and posttreatment values of outcome measures was compared and analyzed. Responders were considered to be patients who demonstrated an improvement greater than or equal to the 25th percentile of the change in bowel score. Comparison between responders and nonresponders was performed. SETTINGS: This investigation was conducted at a neurogastroenterology clinic, tertiary referrals center. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine patients with multiple sclerosis and constipation and/or fecal incontinence were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients were given bowel biofeedback therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the Wexner Constipation and Wexner Incontinence scores. The secondary outcome measures were hospital anxiety and depression scores and anorectal physiology parameters. RESULTS: Data are reported as median and interquartile ranges. After biofeedback there was significant improvement in Wexner Constipation (12 (5-19) pretreatment vs 8 (4-14) posttreatment, P = .001), Wexner Incontinence (12 (3-15) pretreatment vs 4 (2-10) posttreatment, P < .001) and hospital depression scores (7 (3-11) pretreatment vs 5 (3-10) posttreatment, P = .015). The 5-second endurance squeeze pressure was also improved (21 (11-54) mmHg pretreatment vs 43 (26-59) mmHg posttreatment, P = .001). Posttreatment change of Wexner Constipation was -2(-5/0), and of Wexner Incontinence was -3(-9/0) ("-" indicates improvement). Therefore, those patients who had a reduction of at least 5 points in the Wexner Constipation score and/or of at least 9 points in the Wexner Incontinence score were considered responders (18 patients, 46%). They showed a greater improvement of only 5-second endurance squeeze pressure (23.5 (7.5/32.75) mmHg responders vs 4 (-6/20) mmHg nonresponders, P = .008); no difference was observed in the comparison of baseline variables with nonresponders. Significant negative relationship existed between the change in the Wexner Constipation score (-2 (-5/0)) and the pretreatment Wexner Constipation score (12 (5/19), ß = -0.463, P < .001), and the change in the Wexner Incontinence score (-3 (-9/0)) with the pretreatment Wexner Incontinence score (12 (3/15), ß = -0.590, P < .001). So, the higher the initial bowel symptom score, the greater the improvement. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the lack of a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback improves bowel symptoms, depression, and 5-second endurance squeeze pressure in patients with multiple sclerosis.