Comparative connectivity correlates of dystonic and essential tremor deep brain stimulation.

The pathophysiology of dystonic tremor and essential tremor remains partially understood. In patients with medication-refractory dystonic tremor or essential tremor, deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the thalamus or posterior subthalamic area has evolved into a promising treatment option. However, the optimal DBS targets for these disorders remains unknown. This retrospective study explored the optimal targets for DBS in essential tremor and dystonic tremor using a combination of volumes of tissue activated estimation and functional and structural connectivity analyses. We included 20 patients with dystonic tremor who underwent unilateral thalamic DBS, along with a matched cohort of 20 patients with essential tremor DBS. Tremor severity was assessed preoperatively and approximately 6 months after DBS implantation using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale. The tremor-suppressing effects of DBS were estimated using the percentage improvement in the unilateral tremor-rating scale score contralateral to the side of implantation. The optimal stimulation region, based on the cluster centre of gravity for peak contralateral motor score improvement, for essential tremor was located in the ventral intermediate nucleus region and for dystonic tremor in the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus region along the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior nucleus border (4 mm anterior and 3 mm superior to that for essential tremor). Both disorders showed similar functional connectivity patterns: a positive correlation between tremor improvement and involvement of the primary sensorimotor, secondary motor and associative prefrontal regions. Tremor improvement, however, was tightly correlated with the primary sensorimotor regions in essential tremor, whereas in dystonic tremor, the correlation was tighter with the premotor and prefrontal regions. The dentato-rubro-thalamic tract, comprising the decussating and non-decussating fibres, significantly correlated with tremor improvement in both dystonic and essential tremor. In contrast, the pallidothalamic tracts, which primarily project to the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus region, significantly correlated with tremor improvement only in dystonic tremor. Our findings support the hypothesis that the pathophysiology underpinning dystonic tremor involves both the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical network. Further our data suggest that the pathophysiology of essential tremor is primarily attributable to the abnormalities within the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network. We conclude that the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior nucleus border and ventral intermediate nucleus region may be a reasonable DBS target for patients with medication-refractory dystonic tremor and essential tremor, respectively. Uncovering the pathophysiology of these disorders may in the future aid in further improving DBS outcomes.

Motor outcomes and adverse effects of deep brain stimulation for dystonic tremor: A systematic review.

Dystonic tremor (DT) is defined as the tremor in body parts affected by dystonia. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used to manage medically-refractory DT patients, its efficacy has not been well established. The objective of this study is to provide an up-to-date systematic review of DBS outcomes for DT patients. We conducted a literature search using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in February 2020 according to the PRISMA guidelines. From 858 publications, we identified 30 articles involving 89 DT patients who received DBS of different targets. Thalamic DBS was the most common (n = 39) and improved tremor by 40-50% potentially in the long-term over five years with variable effects on dystonic symptoms. Globus pallidus internus (GPi), subthalamic, and subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS improved both tremor and dystonic symptoms; however, data were limited. A few studies have reported better tremor and dystonia outcomes with combinations of different targets. Concerning adverse effects, gait/balance disorders, and ataxia seemed to be more common among patients treated with thalamic or subthalamic DBS, whereas parkinsonian adverse effects were observed only in patients treated with subthalamic or GPi DBS. Comparative benefits and limitations of these targets remain unclear because of the lack of randomized controlled trials. In conclusion, DBS of these targets may improve tremor with a variable effect on dystonia with different adverse effect profiles. The shortcomings in the literature include long-term motor outcomes, quality of life outcomes, optimal DBS targeting, and DBS programming strategy.

Anatomical Correlates of Uncontrollable Laughter With Unilateral Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a well-established treatment for the management of motor complications in Parkinson's disease. Uncontrollable laughter has been reported as a rare side effect of STN stimulation. The precise mechanism responsible for this unique phenomenon remains unclear. We examined in detail the DBS electrode position and stimulation parameters in two patients with uncontrollable laughter during programming after STN-DBS surgery and illustrated the anatomical correlates of the acute mood changes with STN stimulation. CASE REPORT: Unilateral STN-DBS induced uncontrollable laughter with activation of the most ventral contacts in both patients. However, the location of the electrodes responsible for this adverse effect differed between the patients. In the first patient, the DBS lead was placed more inferiorly and medially within the STN. In the second patient, the DBS lead was implanted more anteriorly and inferiorly than initially planned at the level of the substantia nigra reticulata (SNr). CONCLUSION: Unilateral STN-DBS can induce acute uncontrollable laughter with activation of electrodes located more anterior, medial, and inferior in relationship with the standard stereotactic STN target. We suggest that simulation of ventral and medial STN, surrounding limbic structures or the SNr, is the most plausible anatomical substrate responsible for this acute mood and behavioral change. Our findings provide insight into the complex functional neuroanatomical relationship of the STN and adjacent structures important for mood and behavior. DBS programming with more dorsal and lateral contacts within the STN should be entertained to minimize the emotional side effects.

Reduction in DBS frequency improves balance difficulties after thalamic DBS for essential tremor.

Essential tremor (ET) is a syndrome characterized by the presence of symmetric, moderate to high frequency postural and action tremors of the limbs. Additionally, increasing evidence indicates the occurrence of associated cerebellar features in ET patients including impaired gait and balance. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventralis intermedius (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus has been shown to be an effective treatment for medically-refractory ET tremor but its effects on balance remain unclear with conflicting results reported. In this article, we report the effects of frequency modification in four patients with disequilibrium after DBS and review available literature regarding the effects of neurostimulation on balance in ET. Reduction in DBS frequency (10-20Hz reduction intervals) to the lowest effective settings for tremor control was conducted followed by immediate and 4-week assessment of disequilibrium. All patients reported improvement in balance ranging from mild to marked benefit on clinical global impression scale and in the posture and gait disturbance sub-scores of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). There was no significant difference in tremor control with DBS frequency adjustments. Our results suggest a relationship between the effects of high-frequency stimulation and disequilibrium in ET patients treated with bilateral or unilateral DBS. Additional larger, prospective studies are warranted to validate these results and discern the relationship between DBS stimulation settings and cerebellar findings in ET.

Deep brain stimulation significantly decreases disability from low back pain in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients suffer from low back pain (LBP) during the course of their disease. How LBP affects daily functional status and how to manage this aspect of PD has not been adequately explored. METHODS: We examined 16 patients undergoing bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) who met the inclusion criteria for moderate disability from LBP, as classified by the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (OLBPD). RESULTS: Thirteen of 16 patients had attempted additional treatments for LBP, including medical management, massage, chiropractic, epidural steroid injections and/or surgery, with minimal relief. Following DBS, there was a significant improvement in the OLBPD at both the 6-month and 1-year time points (p < 0.02, p < 0.005, respectively). A mean improvement of 31.7% on the OLBPD score was noted. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) similarly decreased significantly at 1 year (p = 0.015). There was no correlation between the OLBPD score and other measures, including the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), age and other nonmotor symptoms. CONCLUSION: Given the prevalent yet undertreated disability associated with LBP in PD, these results are novel in that they show that STN DBS has a significant positive effect on disability associated with LBP.

Deep brain stimulation of the substantia nigra pars reticulata improves forelimb akinesia in the hemiparkinsonian rat.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) employing high-frequency stimulation (HFS) is commonly used in the globus pallidus interna (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for treating motor symptoms of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Although DBS improves motor function in most PD patients, disease progression and stimulation-induced nonmotor complications limit DBS in these areas. In this study, we assessed whether stimulation of the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) improved motor function. Hemiparkinsonian rats predominantly touched with their unimpaired forepaw >90% of the time in the stepping and limb-use asymmetry tests. After SNr-HFS (150 Hz), rats touched equally with both forepaws, similar to naive and sham-lesioned rats. In vivo, SNr-HFS decreased beta oscillations (12-30 Hz) in the SNr of freely moving hemiparkinsonian rats and decreased SNr neuronal spiking activity from 28 ± 1.9 Hz before stimulation to 0.8 ± 1.9 Hz during DBS in anesthetized animals; also, neuronal spiking activity increased from 7 ± 1.6 to 18 ± 1.6 Hz in the ventromedial portion of the thalamus (VM), the primary SNr efferent. In addition, HFS of the SNr in brain slices from normal and reserpine-treated rat pups resulted in a depolarization block of SNr neuronal activity. We demonstrate improvement of forelimb akinesia with SNr-HFS and suggest that this motor effect may have resulted from the attenuation of SNr neuronal activity, decreased SNr beta oscillations, and increased activity of VM thalamic neurons, suggesting that the SNr may be a plausible DBS target for treating motor symptoms of DBS.