Five-year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine 5-year efficacy of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using AF termination as a procedural end point. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients (57±10 years) underwent persistent AF ablation using a stepwise ablation approach (pulmonary vein isolation, electrogram-guided, and linear ablation) with the desired procedural end point being AF termination. Repeat ablation was performed for recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia. AF was terminated by ablation in 120 patients (80%). Arrhythmia-free survival rates after a single procedure were 35.3%±3.9%, 28.0%±3.7%, and 16.8%±3.2% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Arrhythmia-free survival rates after the last procedure (mean 2.1±1.0 procedures) were 89.7%±2.5%, 79.8%±3.4%, and 62.9%±4.5%, at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. During a median follow-up of 58 (interquartile range, 43-73) months after the last ablation procedure, 97 of 150 (64.7%) patients remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs. Another 14 (9.3%) patients maintained sinus rhythm after reinitiation of antiarrhythmic drugs, and an additional 15 (10.0%) patients regressed to paroxysmal recurrences only. Failure to terminate AF during the index procedure (hazard ratio 3.831; 95% confidence interval, 2.070-7.143; P<0.001), left atrial diameter≥50 mm (hazard ratio 2.083; 95% confidence interval, 1.078-4.016; P=0.03), continuous AF duration≥18 months (hazard ratio 1.984; 95% confidence interval, 1.024-3.846; P<0.04), and structural heart disease (hazard ratio 1.874; 95% confidence interval, 1.037-3.388; P=0.04) predicted arrhythmia recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, an ablation strategy aiming at AF termination is associated with freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in the majority of patients over a 5-year follow-up period. Procedural AF nontermination and specific baseline factors predict long-term outcome after ablation.

Characterization of contact force during endocardial and epicardial ventricular mapping.

BACKGROUND: The optimal contact force (CF) for ventricular mapping and ablation remains unvalidated. We assessed CF in different endocardial and epicardial regions during ventricular tachycardia substrate mapping using a CF-sensing catheter (Smartouch; Biosense-Webster) and compared the transseptal versus retroaortic approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 8979 mapping points with CF, and force vector orientation (VO) were recorded in 21 patients, comprising 13 epicardial, 12 left ventricular (6 transseptal and 6 retroaortic approach), and 12 right ventricular endocardial maps. VO was defined as adequate when the vector was directed toward the myocardium. During epicardial mapping, 46% of the points showed an adequate VO and a median CF of 8 (4-13) g, however, with significant differences among the 8 regions. When VO was inadequate, median CF was higher at 16 (10-24) g (P<0.0001). During left ventricular and right ventricular endocardial mapping, 94% of VO were adequate. Median CF of adequate VO was higher in the left ventricular and right ventricular endocardium than in the epicardium (15 [8-25] and 13 [7-22] g versus 8 [4-13] g, respectively; both P<0.001). Global median left ventricular CF with transseptal approach was not statistically different from retroaortic approach, but CF in the apicoinferior and apicoseptal regions was higher with transseptal approach (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular mapping demonstrates important regional variations in CF, but in general, CF is higher endocardially than epicardially where poor catheter orientation is associated with higher CF. A transseptal approach may lead to improved contact particularly in the apicoseptal and inferior regions.

Current hot potatoes in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has evolved to the treatment of choice for patients with drug-resistant and symptomatic AF. Pulmonary vein isolation at the ostial or antral level usually is sufficient for treatment of true paroxysmal AF. For persistent AF ablation, drivers and perpetuators outside of the pulmonary veins are responsible for AF maintenance and have to be targeted to achieve satisfying arrhythmia-free success rate. Both complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation and linear ablation are added to pulmonary vein isolation for persistent AF ablation. Nevertheless, ablation failure and necessity of repeat ablations are still frequent, especially after persistent AF ablation. Pulmonary vein reconduction is the main reason for arrhythmia recurrence after paroxysmal and to a lesser extent after persistent AF ablation. Failure of persistent AF ablation mostly is a consequence of inadequate trigger ablation, substrate modification or incompletely ablated or reconducting linear lesions. In this review we will discuss these points responsible for AF recurrence after ablation and review current possibilities on how to overcome these limitations.

Syncope in Brugada syndrome patients: prevalence, characteristics, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: The report from the 2nd Consensus Committee on BrS suggests that all patients with syncope without a "clear extracardiac cause" should have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). However, a clear extracardiac cause for syncope may be difficult to prove. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize syncope in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS). METHODS: All patients diagnosed with BrS at our institution between 1999 and 2010 were enrolled in a prospective registry. Patients with suspected arrhythmic syncope (group 1) were compared to patients with nonarrhythmic syncope (group 2) and to patients with syncope of doubtful origin (group 3). RESULTS: Of 203 patients with BrS, 57 (28%; 44 male, age 46 ± 12 years) experienced at least 1 syncope. Group 1 consisted of 23 patients, all of whom received an ICD. In group 2 (17 patients), 3 received an ICD because of a positive electrophysiologic study. In group 3 (17 patients), 6 received an implantable loop recorder and 6 received an ICD. After mean follow-up of 65 ± 42 months, 14 patients in group 1 remained asymptomatic, 4 had recurrent syncope, and 6 had appropriate ICD therapy. In group 2, 9 patients remained asymptomatic and 7 had recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope. In group 3, 7 remained asymptomatic and 9 had recurrent syncope. One patient from each group died from a noncardiac cause. CONCLUSION: In the present study, syncope occurred in 28% of patients with BrS. The ventricular arrhythmia rate was 5.5% per year in group 1. In 30%, the etiology of the syncope was questionable. No sudden cardiac death occurred in groups 2 and 3.