Bipolar endoscopic enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: an ESUT systematic review and cumulative analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a cumulative analysis of the current evidence on the surgical and functional outcomes of bipolar endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (b-EEP) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (b-TURP). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed on PubMed, Ovid®, and Scopus® according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Statement (PRISMA Statement). The meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Parameters of interest were surgical and functional outcomes. Weighted mean difference, and odds ratio with 95% confidence interval were calculated for continuous and binary variables, respectively. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effect model. RESULTS: Fourteen comparative studies were included. No statistically significant difference in terms of overall baseline characteristics was found. b-EEP had higher amount of resected tissue (p < 0.0001), shorter catheter time (p = 0.006), lower Hb drop (p = 0.03), and shorter length of stay (p < 0.0001). Equally, overall post-operative complications were lower (p = 0.01) as well as short (p = 0.04), and long-term complication rate (p = 0.04). There was higher re-intervention rate in the b-TURP group (p = 0.02) whereas b-EEP group had smaller residual prostate volume (p = 0.03), and lower post-operative PSA values (p < 0.00001). At long term, b-EEP presented lower IPSS (p = 0.04), higher Qmax (p = 0.002), and lower PVR (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: b-EEP is an effective and safe surgical treatment for BPO. This procedure might offer several advantages over standard b-TURP, including the resection of a larger amount of tissue within the same operative time, shorter hospitalization, lower risk of complications, and lower re-intervention rate. This was submitted to PROSPERO registry: CRD42019126748.

The role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan in biochemical recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrence after primary treatment of prostate cancer is one of the major challenges facing urologists. Biochemical recurrence is not rare and occurs in up to one third of the patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Management of biochemical recurrence is tailored according to the site and the burden of recurrence. Therefore, developing an imaging technique to early detect recurrent lesions represents an urgent need. Positron emission tomography (PET) of 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) is an emerging imaging modality that seems to be a promising tool with capability to localize recurrent prostate cancer. A systematic review of literature was done to evaluate the role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after primary radical treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic and comprehensive review of literature was performed in September 2017 analyzing the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The following key terms were used for the search "PSMA," "prostate-specific membrane antigen," "positron emission tomography," "PET," "recurrent," "prostate cancer," "prostate neoplasm," "prostate malignancy," and "68Ga." Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirty-seven articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis of this systematic review. Of the 37 articles selected for analysis only four studies were prospective. The overall detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA PET scan ranged from 47% up to 96.6%. The main advantage of this imaging technique is its relatively high detection rates at low serum PSA levels below 0.5 ng/mL (ranging from 11.1% to 75%). Higher serum PSA level was strongly associated with increased positivity on 68Ga-PSMA PET scan. 68Ga-PSMA PET scan was found superior to conventional imaging techniques (CT and MRI) in this setting of patients and even it seems to outperform choline-based PET scan. This technique provided significant changes in the therapeutic management of 28.6-87.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: After biochemical recurrence, the primary goal is to locate the recurrent lesions' site. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT seems to be effective in identifying recurrence localization also for very low levels of PSA (<0.5 ng/mL) thus permitting to choose the best therapeutic strategy as early as possible. However, data available cannot be considered exhaustive and prospective randomized trials are needed.

Effectivity of intravescical thermo-chemotherapy prophylaxis for patients with high recurrence and progression risk for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Background&Aim: High grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is common in urological practice. Most of these cancers are or become refractory to intravesical immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Here we evaluated the efficacy of combined local bladder hyperthermia and intravesical mitomycin-C (MMC) instillation in patients with high-risk recurrent NMIBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2014 and December 2015, 18 patients with high risk NMIBC were enrolled. Patients were treated in an outpatient basis with 6 weekly induction sessions followed by monthly maintenance sessions with intravesical MMC in local hyperthermia with bladder wall thermo-chemotherapy (BWT) system (PelvixTT system, Elmedical Ltd., Hod Hasharon, Israel). The follow-up regimen included cystoscopy after the induction cycle and thereafter with regular intervals. Time to disease recurrence was defined as time from the first intravesical treatment to endoscopic or histological documentation of a new bladder tumour. Adverse events were recorded according to CTC 4.0 (Common Toxicity Criteria) score system. RESULTS: Mean age was 72 (32-87) years. 10 patients had multifocal disease, 9 had CIS, 6 had recurrent disease and 2 had highly recurrent disease (> 3 recurrences in a 24 months period). 6 patients underwent previous intravesical chemotherapy with MMC. The average number of maintenance sessions per patient was 7.6. After a mean follow-up of 433 days, 15 patients (83.3%) were recurrence-free. 3 patients had tumour recurrence after a mean period of 248 days without progression. Side effects were limited to grade 1 in 2 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: BWT seems to be feasible and safe in high grade NMIBC. More studies are needed to identify the subgroup of patients who may benefit more from this treatment.

Bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: evaluation of the impact on overall sexual function in an international randomized controlled trial setting.

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: The effect of TURP on overall sexual function and particularly erectile function (EF) is controversial with conflicting results based on a low level of evidence. The effects of monopolar and bipolar TURP (M-TURP and B-TURP, respectively) on EF are similar, as has been shown in a few non-focused randomized control trials (RCTs). For the first time, the present study offers focused results of a comparative evaluation of the effects of B-TURP and M-TURP on overall sexual function, as quantified with the International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire (IIEF-15) in an international, multicentre, double-blind RCT setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP and B-TURP, respectively) using a true bipolar system, for the first time in an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial focusing on the overall sexual function quantified with the International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire (IIEF-15). Other baseline/perioperative parameters potentially influencing erectile function (EF) after TURP were secondarily investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2006 to June 2009, consecutive TURP candidates with benign prostatic obstruction were prospectively recruited in four academic urological centres, randomized 1:1 into M-TURP/B-TURP arms and followed up at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months after surgery. In all, 295 eligible patients were enrolled. Overall sexual function was quantified using self-administered IIEF-15 at baseline and at each subsequent visit. Total IIEF/domain scores were calculated and EF score classified erectile dysfunction severity. Differences in erectile dysfunction severity at each visit compared with baseline (EF evolution), classified patients into 'improved', 'stable' or 'deteriorated'. Pre-postoperative IIEF/domain scores and differences in the distribution of EF evolution were compared between arms throughout follow-up. RESULTS: In all, 279 patients received the allocated intervention; 218/279 patients (78.1%) provided complete IIEF-15 data at baseline and were considered in sexual function analysis. Complete IIEF-15 data were available from 193/218 (88.5%), 186/218 (85.3%) and 179/218 (82.1%) patients at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Sexual function did not differ significantly between arms during follow-up (scores: IIEF, P = 0.750; EF, P = 0.636; orgasmic function, P = 0.868; sexual desire, P = 0.735; intercourse satisfaction, P = 0.917; overall satisfaction, P = 0.927). Resection type was not a predictor of any sexual function changes observed. Distribution of EF evolution did not differ between arms at any time (M-TURP vs B-TURP at 12 months: improved, 23/87 [26.4%] vs 18/92 [19.6%]; stable, 53/87 [60.9%] vs 56/92 [60.8%]; deteriorated, 11/87 [12.7%] vs 18/92 [19.6%]; P = 0.323). CONCLUSION: There were no differences between M-TURP/B-TURP in any aspect of sexual function.

Midterm results from an international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.

BACKGROUND: Pooled data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with short-term follow-up have shown a safety advantage for bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) compared with monopolar TURP (M-TURP). However, RCTs with follow-up >12 mo are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To compare the midterm safety/efficacy of B-TURP versus M-TURP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From July 2006 to June 2009, TURP candidates with benign prostatic obstruction were consecutively recruited in four centres, randomised 1:1 into the M-TURP or the B-TURP arm and regularly followed up to 36 mo postoperatively. A total of 295 patients were enrolled. INTERVENTION: M-TURP or B-TURP using the AUTOCON II 400 electrosurgical unit. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Safety was estimated by complication rates with a special emphasis on urethral strictures (US) and bladder neck contractures (BNCs) recorded during the short-term (up to 12 mo) and midterm (up to 36 mo) follow-up. Efficacy quantified by changes in maximum urine flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, and International Prostate Symptom Score was compared with baseline, and reintervention rates in each arm were also evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 279 patients received treatment after allocation. Mean follow-up was 28.8 mo. A total of 186 of 279 patients (66.7%) completed the 36-mo follow-up. Posttreatment withdrawal rates did not differ significantly between arms. Safety was assessed in 230 patients (82.4%) at a mean follow-up of 33.4 mo. Ten US cases were seen in each arm (M-TURP vs B-TURP: 9.3% vs 8.2%; p=0.959); two versus eight BNC cases (M-TURP vs B-TURP: 1.9% vs 6.6%; p=0.108) were collectively detected at the midterm follow-up. Resection type was not a significant predictor of the risk of US/BNC formation. Efficacy was similar between arms and durable. A total of 10 of 230 patients (4.3%) experienced failure to cure and needed reintervention without significant differences between arms. High overall reintervention rates, withdrawal rates, and sample size determination not based on US/BNC rates represent potential limitations. CONCLUSIONS: The midterm safety and efficacy of B-TURP and M-TURP are comparable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR703 (http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=703).

Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar (B-) and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) in an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial using the bipolar system AUTOCON(®) II 400 ESU for the first time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2006 to June 2009, consecutive transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) candidates with benign prostatic obstruction were prospectively recruited in four academic urological centres, randomized 1:1 into an M-TURP or B-TURP arm and followed up for 6 weeks after surgery. A total of 295 eligible patients were enrolled. Of these, 279 patients received treatment (M-TURP, n= 138; B-TURP, n= 141) and were analysed for immediate postoperative outcomes and perioperative safety. In all, 268 patients (M-TURP, n= 129; B-TURP, n= 139) were analysed for efficacy, which was quantified using changes in maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume and International Prostate Symptom Score at 6 weeks compared with baseline. Safety was estimated using sodium and haemoglobin level changes immediately after surgery and perioperative complication occurrence graded according to the modified Clavien classification system. Secondary outcomes included operation-resection time, resection rate, capsular perforation and catheterization time. RESULTS: No significant differences were detected between each study arm except that postoperative decreases in sodium levels favoured B-TURP (-0.8 vs -2.5 mmol/L, for B-TURP and M-TURP, respectively; P= 0.003). The lowest values were 131 mmol/L (B-TURP) and 106 mmol/L (M-TURP). Nine patients ranged between 125 and 130 mmol/L and the values for three patients were <125 mmol/L after M-TURP. The greatest decrease was 9 mmol/L after B-TURP (two patients). In nine patients (M-TURP) the decrease was between 9 and 34 mmol/L. These results were not translated into a significant difference in TUR-syndrome rates (1/138: 0.7% vs 0/141: 0.0%, for M-TURP and B-TURP, respectively; P= 0.495). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the previous available evidence, no clinical advantage for B-TURP was shown. Perioperative efficacy, safety and secondary outcomes were comparable between study arms. The potentially improved safety of B-TURP that is attributed to the elimination of dilutional hyponatraemia risk, a risk still present with M-TURP, did not translate into a significant clinical benefit in experienced hands.

Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate--technical modifications and early clinical experience.

The purpose of the study was to update the current modifications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) using bipolar high frequency current and to report on our first own clinical experience. Based on a Medline search covering the period from January 2000 to September 2006 and our clinical experience with three different devices (VISTA-ACMI, Gyrus, Storz), the technical basis of these modifications was described. In addition, an analysis of the actual outcome (handling, complications, morbidity) of bipolar TURP (n = 124) compared to a parallel series of monopolar TURP (N = 148) was carried out. Recently, five different modifications of bipolar resection devices (ACMI, Gyrus, Olympus, Storz, Wolf) have been introduced. Experimental and clinical data were available for four of these modifications (VISTA-ACMI, Gyrus, Olympus, Storz). The devices differ in terms of modification of the passive electrode (two loops, single loop, resectoscope sheath). Bipolar technology allows the use of 0.9% sodium chloride (instead of glycine) as irrigant. In all bipolar devices, a slight prolongation was noted for initiation of the cut, with the VISTA showing the poorest cutting behaviour. Finest apical dissection could be performed with the Storz device. Phase III-studies comparing bipolar and monopolar TURP showed advantages for bipolar concerning the rate of TUR-syndrome/fluid absorption, bleeding, catheter time, whereas the resection speed was similar. In two studies using two different devices (Gyrus, Olympus) a higher rate of urethral strictures was detected. We conclude that TURP still represents the reference standard in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Initial data suggest that bipolar technology is safe and effective. It may offer some advantages with respect to the reduction of TUR-syndrome, less conductive trauma (i.e. tissue charring), cheaper irrigation solution, and a shorter catheter time. In addition to already existing phase III-studies, larger randomized mulit-institutional trials will have to substantiate these advantages.

Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention.

OBJECTIVES: To update the complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), including management and prevention based on technological evolution. METHODS: Based on a MEDLINE search from 1989 to 2005, the 2003 results of quality management of Baden-Württemberg, and long-term personal experience at three German centers, the incidence of complications after TURP was analyzed for three subsequent periods: early (1979-1994); intermediate (1994-1999); and recent (2000-2005) with recommendations for management and prevention. RESULTS: Technological improvements such as microprocessor-controlled units, better armamentarium such as video TUR, and training helped to reduce perioperative complications (recent vs. early) such as transfusion rate (0.4% vs. 7.1%), TUR syndrome (0.0% vs. 1.1%), clot retention (2% vs. 5%), and urinary tract infection (1.7% vs. 8.2%). Urinary retention (3% vs. 9%) is generally attributed to primary detrusor failure rather than to incomplete resection. Early urge incontinence occurs in up to 30-40% of patients; however, late iatrogenic stress incontinence is rare (<0.5%). Despite an increasing age (55% of patients are older than 70), the associated morbidity of TURP maintained at a low level (<1%) with a mortality rate of 0-0.25%. The major late complications are urethral strictures (2.2-9.8%) and bladder neck contractures (0.3-9.2%). The retreatment rate range is 3-14.5% after five years. CONCLUSIONS: TURP still represents the gold standard for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia with decreasing complication rates. Technological alternatives such as bipolar and laser treatments may further minimize the risks of this technically difficult procedure.