RESUMEN
AIMS: To test the efficacy of a brief intervention to reduce alcohol or drug use and to promote use of addiction services among patients seeking mental health treatment. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multi-centre, longitudinal, two-group randomized controlled trial with randomization within each of two mental health treatment systems located in Ventura County and Los Angeles County in California, USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 718 patients (49.2% female) aged 18 and older with a mental health diagnosis and either a heavy drinking day or any use of cannabis or stimulants in the past 90 days. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: A motivation-based brief intervention with personalized feedback (screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) condition) (n = 354) or a health education session (control condition) (n = 364). MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes included frequency of heavy drinking days, days of cannabis use and days of stimulant use at the primary end-point 3 months post-baseline. Secondary outcomes included frequency and abstinence from substance use out to a 12-month follow-up and the use of addiction treatment services. FINDINGS: Participants in the SBIRT condition had fewer heavy drinking days [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53; 95% credible interval (CrI) = 0.48-0.6] and fewer days of stimulant use (OR = 0.58; 95% CrI = 0.50-0.66) at the 3-month follow-up compared with participants in the health education condition. Participants in the SBIRT condition did not comparatively reduce days of cannabis use at the 3-month follow-up (OR = 0.93; 95% CrI = 0.85-1.01). Secondary outcomes indicated sustained effects of SBIRT on reducing the frequency of heavy drinking days and days of stimulant use. No effects were observed on abstinence rates or use of addiction treatment services. CONCLUSIONS: Screening and brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol and drug use in mental health treatment settings were effective at reducing the frequency of heavy drinking and stimulant use.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Derivación y Consulta , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Adulto , California , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In light of the known associations between stress, negative affect, and relapse, mindfulness strategies hold promise as a means of reducing relapse susceptibility. In a pilot randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the effects of Mindfulness Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP), relative to a health education control condition (HE) among stimulant dependent adults receiving contingency management. All participants received a 12-week contingency management (CM) intervention. Following a 4-week CM-only lead in phase, participants were randomly assigned to concurrently receive MBRP (n=31) or HE (n=32). Stimulant dependent adults age 18 and over. A university based clinical research center. The primary outcomes were stimulant use, measured by urine drug screens weekly during the intervention and at 1-month post-treatment, negative affect, measured by the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory, and psychiatric severity, measured by the Addiction Severity Index. Medium effect sizes favoring MBRP were observed for negative affect and overall psychiatric severity outcomes. Depression severity changed differentially over time as a function of group, with MBRP participants reporting greater reductions through follow-up (p=0.03; Effect Size=0.58). Likewise, the MBRP group evidenced greater declines in psychiatric severity, (p=0.01; Effect Size=0.61 at follow-up). Among those with depressive and anxiety disorders, MBRP was associated with lower odds of stimulant use relative to the control condition (Odds Ratio= 0.78, p=0.03 and OR=0.68, p=0.04). MBRP effectively reduces negative affect and psychiatric impairment, and is particularly effective in reducing stimulant use among stimulant dependent adults with mood and anxiety disorders.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Salud Mental , Atención Primaria de Salud , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , California/epidemiología , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Política de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Salud Mental/economía , Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicologíaRESUMEN
It is important to understand the perceptions of staff members who will be implementing the expected integration of mental health and substance use services into primary care. Surveys were administered to mental health/substance use disorder (MH/SUD) staff, support staff (SS), and primary care providers (PCPs) from three organizations (seven sites) that were participating in an initiative to promote the integration of MH/SUD services into primary care in Kern County, California. Results suggest that integration and MH/SUD services are highly valued among all staff types, and that staff are uniformly interested in further MH/SUD training. However, there were significant differences in staff perceptions. MH/SUD staff and services were valued by PCPs more than MH/SUD staff perceived being valued by PCPs, and MH/SUD staff were less likely to agree that communication with PCPs was good. Information seemed to flow better from MH/SUD staff to PCPs than in the other direction.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Percepción , Atención Primaria de Salud , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Análisis de Varianza , California , Comunicación , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Conducta Cooperativa , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Modelos Lineales , Objetivos Organizacionales , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Integrating substance use disorder (SUD) services with primary care (PC) can improve access to SUD services for the 20.9 million Americans who need SUD treatment but do not receive it, and help prevent the onset of SUDs among the 68 million Americans who use psychoactive substances in a risky manner. We lay out the reasons for integrating SUD and PC services and then explore the models used and the experiences of providers as they have begun SUD/PC integration in California.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , California , Conducta Cooperativa , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Objetivos Organizacionales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
An environmental survey was conducted regarding substance abuse recovery supports and services (RSS) delivered across California, where these services are offered, and by whom. Inquiries were made regarding RSS measurement efforts, funding mechanisms, and technical assistance needs. A survey was disseminated to all 57 administrators of county alcohol and other drug or behavioral departments. Results indicate that 62% (23 of 37) of responding counties offer RSS. Overall, certified addiction counselors (CACs) were the staff most utilized to provide RSS, followed by peers, clinicians, and volunteers. Among recovery-community organizations (RCOs), peers, volunteers, and CACs were the most utilized staff. Sober living homes were the most prevalent type of RCO, followed by recovery centers, faith-based/recovery ministries, and recovery schools. Forty-five percent of counties reported funding RSS; 37.8% collect data. RSS may provide valuable support services for individuals recovering from alcohol/drug use; however, the field must further define RSS and develop measurement strategies to justify RSS funding.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Consejo , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud , Instituciones Residenciales , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , California , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Consejo/economía , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades/economía , Instituciones Residenciales/economía , Instituciones Residenciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/economía , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos , United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration/economíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this study, we reviewed data on drug use among high school students in Iran. RECENT FINDINGS: Published epidemiological studies in international and domestic journals show that drug use/abuse is a serious mental health problem in Iran. There is cultural support for opium in Iran and also there is cultural tolerance for tobacco smoking, especially as water pipe smoking in Iranian families. Alcohol, opium and cannabis are the most frequently used illicit drugs, but there are new emerging problems with anabolic steroids, ecstasy and stimulant substances, such as crystal methamphetamine. SUMMARY: There is a serious drug abuse problem among Iranian high school students. It could be due to role modeling by parents - mainly fathers - and also cultural tolerance of some substances. Early onset of tobacco smoking, with a daily use rate between 4.4 and 12.8% in high school students, is an important risk factor for other drug abuse problems. Use of all types of drugs, except prescription drugs, is more prevalent among boys. Alcohol is the most frequently abused substance, with a lifetime rate of at least 9.9%. Lifetime rates of opiate use - mostly opium - was between 1.2 and 8.6% in different parts of the country. As drug abuse is a frequent problem among Iranian high school students, it is necessary to design and implement drug prevention programs to protect them. Such programs, including life skills training and drug education, have been operating in recent years for Iranian students from kindergarten to the university level.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/etnología , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Comparación Transcultural , Drogas de Diseño , Drogas Ilícitas , Fumar/etnología , Fumar/epidemiología , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etnología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Alcoholismo/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Educación en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Incidencia , Irán , Masculino , Opio , Factores Sexuales , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Facilitación Social , Valores Sociales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
This study examined correlates of methamphetamine (MA) and marijuana (MJ) use and treatment response among treatment-involved youth (N = 4,430) in Los Angeles County, California treated between 2000 and 2005. Of the sample, 912 (21%) were primary MA and 3,518 (79%) were primary MJ users. Correlates of increased MA use included being female, White, Asian or Latino, older age, previous treatment involvement, legal status of probation or parole, and initiating drug use at an older age. Treatment trends showed a rise in treatment admissions for MA, with more MA users enrolling in residential treatment compared to outpatient treatment. Predictors of retention, drug use at discharge, and completion by treatment modality are discussed. Results can guide the development of effective strategies for treatment assessment and planning tailored towards minimizing drug use and maximizing treatment response among youth.