Microbial findings, sensitivity and outcome in patients with postoperative peritonitis a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute postoperative peritonitis resulting from previous abdominal surgery is still a severe and potentially fatal disease, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate patients' outcome after postoperative peritonitis and identify the most effective empiric antibiotic regimes. METHODS: 422 patients with acute postoperative peritonitis as a result to earlier abdominal operation (e.g. anastomotic leakage) were analyzed retrospectively focusing on the origin of the peritonitis, microbial flora and resistance patterns. Furthermore, mortality was estimated according to sensitivity results of the tested antibiotics. RESULTS: In 50% of the patients, anastomotic leakage was located in the colon. The predominantly cultured microorganisms were Escherichia coli and Enterobacteriaceae. The combination of meropenem and vancomycin was effective in 96% of these microbes. The frequently used combinations of piperacillin/sulbactam and cefotaxime/metronidazole were effective in only 67% and 43%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to show that the currently used antibiotic regimes with piperacillin/sulbactam and cefotaxime/metronidazole are ineffective in a relevant number of patients with anastomotic leakage. Only meropenem or meropenem/vancomycin cover most of the microbes predominant in postoperative peritonitis.

Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection: A retrospective analysis of the Hamburg Modification.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pancreatitis remains a challenging inflammatory disease, causing progressive, irreversible fibrosis of the pancreatic parenchyma. Several surgical options for treatment have been established, but duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections seem to be the most favorable option other than pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate the outcomes of the Hamburg modification of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated-for long-term outcomes concerning pain control, quality of life, and symptom control-500 consecutive patients suffering from painful chronic pancreatitis who had undergone the Hamburg modification of the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. Additionally, the patients were compared with a database of 104 patients who underwent duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections according to Beger or Frey. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 10 years, overall survival was 90% in those patients having undergone the Hamburg modification. Regarding analgetic medications, the median pain score for frequency of pain attacks, measured by a visual analog scale and inability to work, was 0 (0-100), and the global quality of life revealed a median of 92 (0-100). In addition, we found that a high rate of patients continued consuming alcohol after the operation (37.9%). The rate of redo surgery owing to the recurrence of chronic pancreatitis was 7.6% after this Hamburg modification. CONCLUSION: Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections provide adequate outcomes in terms of pain control, quality of life, and symptom control. In this retrospective analysis, the Hamburg modification was found to be a good alternative to other forms of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections. The choice of a certain modification of the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection may depend on the surgeon's expertise and the individual needs of the patient.