Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(10): 1140-1150, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31108012

RESUMEN

AIM: Significant recent changes in management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) include preoperative staging, use of extended neoadjuvant therapies and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study was aimed at characterizing these changes and associated short-term outcomes. METHOD: We retrospectively analysed treatment and outcome data from patients with T3/4 or N+ LARC ≤ 15 cm from the anal verge who were evaluated at a comprehensive cancer centre in 2009-2015. RESULTS: In total, 798 patients were identified and grouped into five cohorts based on treatment year: 2009-2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014-2015. Temporal changes included increased reliance on MRI staging, from 57% in 2009-2010 to 98% in 2014-2015 (P < 0.001); increased use of total neoadjuvant therapy, from 17% to 76% (P < 0.001); and increased use of MIS, from 33% to 70% (P < 0.001). Concurrently, median hospital stay decreased (from 7 to 5 days; P < 0.001), as did the rates of Grade III-V complications (from 13% to 7%; P < 0.05), surgical site infections (from 24% to 8%; P < 0.001), anastomotic leak (from 11% to 3%; P < 0.05) and positive circumferential resection margin (from 9% to 4%; P < 0.05). TNM downstaging increased from 62% to 74% (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Shifts toward MRI-based staging, total neoadjuvant therapy and MIS occurred between 2009 and 2015. Over the same period, treatment responses improved, and lengths of stay and the incidence of complications decreased.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/tendencias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Proctectomía/tendencias , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ir Med J ; 98(5): 144-5, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16010783

RESUMEN

Carpal tunnel release can be performed under general or local anaesthetic. However, many surgeons believe the upper arm tourniquet is not tolerated by the patient when awake. We use a forearm tourniquet for carpal tunnel decompression under local anaesthesia. The aim of this study is to assess patient tolerance of the technique. Between January 1st 1996 and December 31st 2000, 74 patients had carpal tunnel release performed using local anaesthesia. We sent a postal questionnaire to each, asking the patient to rate different aspects of the procedure. Fifty-eight patients replied (78% response). Forty-four of the respondents (76%) tolerated the tourniquet well, finding it to be 'no problem' or only 'mildly painful'. The same number reported they would prefer to have local anaesthesia again in the event of their requiring a similar operation on their hand. We believe carpal tunnel release using local anaesthetic and a forearm tourniquet is well tolerated by the patient.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Bupivacaína , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/cirugía , Torniquetes/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA