Points to Consider in Designing and Conducting Juvenile Toxicology Studies.

In support of a clinical trial in the pediatric population, available nonclinical and clinical data provide input on the study design and safety monitoring considerations. When the existing data are lacking to support the safety of the planned pediatric clinical trial, a juvenile animal toxicity study is likely required. Usually a single relevant species, preferably a rodent, is chosen as the species of choice, while a nonrodent species can be appropriate when scientifically justified. Juvenile toxicology studies, in general, are complicated both conceptually and logistically. Development in young animals is a continuous process with different organs maturing at different rates and time. Structural and functional maturational differences have been shown to affect drug safety. Key points to consider in conducting a juvenile toxicology study include a comparative development of the organ systems, differences in the pharmacokinetics/absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (PK/ADME) profiles of the drug between young animal and child, and logistical requirement in the juvenile study design. The purpose of this publication is to note pertinent points to consider when designing and conducting juvenile toxicology studies and to aid in future modifications and enhancements of these studies to enable a superior predictability of safety of medicines in the pediatric population.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider Review: Inclusion of Reproductive and Pathology End Points for Assessment of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity in Pharmaceutical Drug Development.

Standard components of nonclinical toxicity testing for novel pharmaceuticals include clinical and anatomic pathology, as well as separate evaluation of effects on reproduction and development to inform clinical development and labeling. General study designs in regulatory guidances do not specifically mandate use of pathology or reproductive end points across all study types; thus, inclusion and use of these end points are variable. The Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP) formed a Working Group to assess the current guidelines and practices on the use of reproductive, anatomic pathology, and clinical pathology end points in general, reproductive, and developmental toxicology studies. The Working Group constructed a survey sent to pathologists and reproductive toxicologists, and responses from participating organizations were collected through the STP for evaluation by the Working Group. The regulatory context, relevant survey results, and collective experience of the Working Group are discussed and provide the basis of each assessment by study type. Overall, the current practice of including specific end points on a case-by-case basis is considered appropriate. Points to consider are summarized for inclusion of reproductive end points in general toxicity studies and for the informed use of pathology end points in reproductive and developmental toxicity studies.

Juvenile Toxicology: Relevance and Challenges for Toxicologists and Pathologists.

The Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP) Education Committee and the STP Reproductive Special Interest Group held a North Carolina regional meeting entitled, "Juvenile Toxicology: Relevance and Challenges for Toxicologists and Pathologists" on March 13, 2015, at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Toxicology Program in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The purpose of this regional meeting was to familiarize attendees with the topic of juvenile toxicity testing and discuss its relevance to clinical pediatric medicine, regulatory perspectives, challenges of appropriate study design confronted by toxicologists, and challenges of histopathologic examination and interpretation of juvenile tissues faced by pathologists. The 1-day meeting was a success with over 60 attendees representing industry, government, research organizations, and academia.