The effect of high-dose, short-term caffeine intake on the renal clearance of calcium, sodium and creatinine in healthy adults.

The consumption of caffeine has been linked to osteoporosis, believed to be due to enhanced bone resorption as a result of increased calcium excretion in the urine. However, the amount of calcium in the urine may not necessarily reflect the true effect of caffeine on calcium clearance. This study therefore examined the impact of high-dose, short-term caffeine intake on renal clearance of calcium, sodium and creatinine in healthy adults. In a double-blind clinical study, participants chewed caffeine (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) gum for 5 minutes at 2-hour intervals over a 6-hour treatment period (800 mg total caffeine). Caffeine increased renal calcium clearance by 77%. Furthermore, the effect was positively correlated with sodium clearance and urine volume, suggesting that caffeine may act through inhibition of sodium reabsorption in the proximal convoluted tubule. This study confirmed that caffeine does increase renal calcium clearance and fosters further investigation into safe consumption of caffeine.

Current fluconazole treatment regimens result in under-dosing of critically ill adults during early therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate current fluconazole treatment regimens in critically ill adults over the typical treatment course. METHODS: Data from critically ill adults treated with fluconazole (n=30) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model. Probability of target attainment (PTA) (fAUC24/MIC >100) was determined from simulations for four previously proposed treatment regimens: (i) 400 mg once daily, (ii) an 800 mg loading dose followed by 400 mg once daily, (iii) 400 mg twice daily, and (iv) a 12 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once daily. The effect of body weight (40, 70, 120 kg) and renal function (continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); 20, 60, 120, 180 mL/min creatinine clearance) on PTA was assessed. RESULTS: Early (0-48 h) fluconazole target attainment for infections with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 mg/L was highly variable. PTA was highest with an 800 mg loading dose for underweight (40 kg) patients and with a 12 mg/kg loading dose for the remainder. End-of-treatment PTA was highest with the 400 mg twice daily maintenance dosing for patients who were under- or normal weight and 6 mg/kg maintenance dosing for overweight (120 kg) patients. None of the fluconazole regimens reliably attained early targets for MICs of ≥4 mg/L. CONCLUSION: Current fluconazole dosing regimens do not achieve adequate early target attainment in critically ill adults, particularly in those who are overweight, have higher creatinine clearance, or are undergoing CRRT. Current fluconazole dosing strategies are generally inadequate to treat organisms with an MIC of ≥4 mg/L.

Cannabinoid Disposition After Human Intraperitoneal Use: AnInsight Into Intraperitoneal Pharmacokinetic Properties in Metastatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Medicinal cannabis is prescribed under the provision of a controlled drug in the Australian Poisons Standard. However, multiple laws must be navigated in order for patients to obtain access and imported products can be expensive. Dose-response information for both efficacy and toxicity pertaining to medicinal cannabis is lacking. The pharmacokinetic properties of cannabis administered by traditional routes has been described but to date, there is no literature on the pharmacokinetic properties of an intraperitoneal cannabinoid emulsion. CASE DESCRIPTION: A cachectic 56-year-old female with stage IV ovarian cancer and peritoneal metastases presented to hospital with fevers, abdominal distension and severe pain, vomiting, anorexia, dehydration and confusion. The patient reported receiving an intraperitoneal injection, purported to contain 12g of mixed cannabinoid (administered by a deregistered medical practitioner) two days prior to presentation. Additionally, cannabis oil oral capsules were administered in the hours prior to hospital admission. RESULTS: THC concentrations were consistent with the clinical state but not with the known pharmacokinetic properties of cannabis nor of intraperitoneal absorption. THC concentrations at the time of presentation were predicted to be ~60ng/mL. Evidence suggests that blood THC concentrations >5ng/mL are associated with substantial cognitive and psychomotor impairment. The predicted time for concentrations to drop <5ng/mL was 49days after administration. DISCUSSION: The unusual pharmacokinetic properties of the case suggest that there is a large amount unknown about cannabis pharmacokinetic properties. The pharmacokinetic properties of a large amount of a lipid soluble compound given intraperitoneally gave insights into the absorption and distribution of cannabinoids, particularly in the setting of metastatic malignancy.

Pharmacokinetics of Cannabis in Cancer Cachexia-Anorexia Syndrome.

Anorexia can affect up to 90 % of people with advanced cancer. It is a complex symptom associated with changes in taste, lack of hunger at mealtimes and lack of food enjoyment. Associated weight loss is part of the physical decline that occurs as cancer worsens. Weight loss can also occur from cachexia, the increased metabolism of energy due to raised inflammatory cytokines, liver metastases and other factors seen in several advanced cancers. Independent of anorexia, although frequently associated (where it is referred to as the cachexia-anorexia syndrome), it accounts for a significant amount of morbidity and deaths in people with cancer. In particular, quality of life for the patient and the family is significantly affected with this syndrome as it causes anxiety and distress. Therefore, it is important that research into therapies is undertaken, particularly focusing on an understanding of the pharmacokinetic properties of compounds in this cachexic population. Cannabinoids are one such group of therapies that have received a large amount of media focus recently. However, there appears to be a lack on rigorous pharmacokinetic data of these complex and varied compounds in the cachexic population. Similarly, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic data in any population group for the non- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) cannabinoids (often due to the lack of analytical standards for quantification). This review will thus examine the pharmacokinetics of major cannabinoids i.e. THC and CBD in a cancer population. Overall, based on the current literature, evidence for the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of cancer-related cachexia-anorexia syndrome remains equivocal. A high-quality, rigorous, phase I/II study to elicit pharmacokinetic dose-concentration and concentration-response data, with a clinically acceptable mode of delivery to reduce intrapatient variability and enable more consistent bioavailability is needed in this population.

Endogenous plasma carnitine pool composition and response to erythropoietin treatment in chronic haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is a common complication associated with haemodialysis and is usually managed by treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). However, many patients remain hyporesponsive to rHuEPO treatment despite adequate iron therapy. The effect of L-carnitine administration on rHuEPO dose and/or haematocrit in haemodialysis patients has been previously reported with equivocal results. This study examined the relationship between endogenous carnitine pool composition and rHuEPO requirements in long-term haemodialysis patients. METHODS: Pre-dialysis blood samples were collected from 87 patients and analysed for plasma L-carnitine and individual acylcarnitine levels by LCMS/MS. As an indication of rHuEPO responsiveness, erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) was calculated as rHuEPO dose/kg/week normalized for haemoglobin levels. RESULTS: A significant negative correlation between L-carnitine levels and ERI was found (P = 0.0421). All patients categorized as high ERI (>0.02 microg/kg/week/gHb) exhibited subnormal L-carnitine levels (<30 microM); conversely, patients with normal L-carnitine levels (>30 microM) displayed low ERI values (<0.02 microg/kg/week/gHb). More importantly, the ratio of non-acetyl acylcarnitines/total carnitine was significantly positively correlated with ERI (P = 0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate the relationship between carnitine levels and response to rHuEPO treatment in haemodialysis patients, in particular, the importance of the proportion of long-chain acylcarnitines within the plasma carnitine pool. This proportion may be more indicative of the response to L-carnitine supplementation than absolute L-carnitine levels alone.

L-carnitine supplementation in the dialysis population: are Australian patients missing out?

It has been widely established that patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic haemodialysis therapy exhibit low endogenous levels of L-carnitine and elevated acylcarnitine levels; however, the clinical implication of this altered carnitine profile is not as clear. It has been suggested that these disturbances in carnitine homeostasis may be associated with a number of clinical problems common in this patient population, including erythropoietin-resistant anaemia, cardiac dysfunction, and dialytic complications such as hypotension, cramps and fatigue. In January 2003, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (USA) implemented coverage of intravenous L-carnitine for the treatment of erythropoietin-resistant anaemia and/or intradialytic hypotension in patients with low endogenous L-carnitine concentrations. It has been estimated that in the period of 1998-2003, 3.8-7.2% of all haemodialysis patients in the USA received at least one dose of L-carnitine, with 2.7-5.2% of patients receiving at least 3 months of supplementation for one or both of these conditions. The use of L-carnitine within Australia is virtually non-existent, which leads us to the question: Are Australian haemodialysis patients missing out? This review examines the previous research associated with L-carnitine administration to chronic dialysis patients for the treatment of anaemia, cardiac dysfunction, dyslipidaemia and/or dialytic symptoms, and discusses whether supplementation is warranted within the Australian setting.