Impaired Discrimination of Electrocutaneous Stimulation in the Paretic Hand of Stroke Survivors.

Artificial sensory feedback via electrocutaneous stimulation can be used to assist or rehabilitate stroke survivors with sensory deficits. Conveying the magnitude of tactile stimuli is an important aspect of artificial sensory feedback. Here, we explore how stroke-related sensory deficits impact the ability of electrocutaneous stimulation to convey the magnitude of tactile stimuli. Using classical psychophysical methods, we quantified the threshold of detection and the just-noticeable difference of electrocutaneous stimulation current in five stroke survivors with unilateral sensory deficits. We show significantly greater (40%) stimulation currents are needed for initial perception on the paretic hand compared to the non-paretic hand. We also show significantly greater percent changes in stimulation current (140%) are needed for reliable incremental perception on the paretic hand compared to the non-paretic hand. Lastly, we show little correlation between electrocutaneous discrimination performance and clinical sensory assessments of light-touch and spatial mechanoperception. These findings can help guide the implementation of artificial sensory feedback as an assistive or rehabilitative intervention for individuals experiencing sensory loss after a stroke.Clinical Relevance- Our results can help guide the implementation of electrical stimulation as an assistive or rehabilitative intervention for individuals with sensory loss after stroke.

Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing in chronic stroke: not always efficacious.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) has been reported to be efficacious in promoting upper-extremity (UE) recovery in chronic stroke. We tested a modified form of BATRAC (modBATRAC) in a new group of participants with a condensed treatment regime to determine whether we could replicate these reported results. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with chronic stroke completed 2 weeks of 2.25 hours per session, 4 sessions per week of modBATRAC. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in UE Fugl-Meyer or Wolf Motor Function Test scores. Subjects did report increased paretic UE use on the Motor Activity Log (mean change, 0.50; SD = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study offer only partial support for the efficacy of modBATRAC. As in previous trials, modBATRAC facilitated increased use of the paretic arm, but unlike previous trials, it did not increase motor performance. These differences may reflect a more temporally condensed training schedule and less impaired patients.