Rebiopsy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, clinical relevance and prognostic implications.

INTRODUCTION: Rebiopsies of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are mainly performed to (i) cover the evolution of potentially amenable resistance mechanisms against a targeted therapy, and (ii) to identify new therapeutic targets which were not detected in the initial diagnostic biopsy. Comprehensive systematic analyses evaluating the value of rebiopsies are missing. METHODS: Clinical databases from two large comprehensive cancer center networks were queried following prespecified criteria to identify prospectively entered NSCLC cases with at least one rebiopsy at disease progression. Clinicopathological and biomarker findings including multigene sequencing were correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: From a total of 17,477 stage IV NSCLC patients, a cohort of 403 evaluable patients undergoing at least one rebiopsy of a primary tumor or metastasis was retrieved. Changes in biomarker profiles as compared to baseline were observed in 48.9%. In 31.3% of cases, findings of potential therapeutic relevance were revealed, including 18 patients (4.4%) with a targetable marker only detected at rebiopsy. New findings were more frequent (greater than50%) in NSCLC with EGFR/ALK/ROS1 alterations, including mutations of the dominant oncogene, TP53 mutations, and MET or ERBB2 amplifications. Patients undergoing rebiopsy exhibited superior overall survival compared to a control group, irrespective of presence (HR 0.28) or absence (HR 0.20, both p < 0.001) of a therapeutically targetable aberration. CONCLUSIONS: Rebiopsies at progression of advanced NSCLC are strongly supported by a high rate of clinically relevant findings. Current clinical practice selects a patient population with exceptional outcomes, which merits further characterization.

Assessing the Impact of a Novel Integrated Palliative Care and Medical Oncology Inpatient Service on Health Care Utilization before Hospice Enrollment.

BACKGROUND: Evidence increasingly supports the integration of specialist palliative care (PC) into routine cancer care. A novel, fully integrated PC and medical oncology inpatient service was developed at Duke University Hospital in 2011. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of PC integration on health care utilization among hospitalized cancer patients before hospice enrollment. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Patients in the solid tumor inpatient unit who were discharged to hospice between September 1, 2009, and June 30, 2010 (pre-PC integration), and September 1, 2011, to June 30, 2012 (postintegration). Cohorts were compared on the following outcomes from their final hospitalization before hospice enrollment: intensive care unit days, invasive procedures, subspecialty consultations, radiographic studies, hospital length of stay, and use of chemotherapy or radiation. Cohort differences were examined with descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six patients were included in the analysis (133 pre-PC integration; 163 post-PC integration). Patient characteristics were similar between cohorts. Health care utilization was relatively low in both groups, although 26% and 24% were receiving chemotherapy at the time of admission or during hospitalization in the pre- and post-PC integration cohorts, respectively, and 6.8% in each cohort spent time in an intensive care unit. We found no significant differences in utilization between cohorts. DISCUSSION: PC integration into an inpatient solid tumor service may not impact health care utilization during the final hospitalization before discharge to hospice. This likely reflects the greater benefits of integrating PC farther upstream from the terminal hospitalization, if one hopes to meaningfully impact utilization near the end of life.

Sorafenib for Advanced and Refractory Desmoid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Desmoid tumors (also referred to as aggressive fibromatosis) are connective tissue neoplasms that can arise in any anatomical location and infiltrate the mesentery, neurovascular structures, and visceral organs. There is no standard of care. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 87 patients with progressive, symptomatic, or recurrent desmoid tumors to receive either sorafenib (400-mg tablet once daily) or matching placebo. Crossover to the sorafenib group was permitted for patients in the placebo group who had disease progression. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival; rates of objective response and adverse events were also evaluated. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 27.2 months, the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69 to 96) in the sorafenib group and 36% (95% CI, 22 to 57) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.31; P<0.001). Before crossover, the objective response rate was 33% (95% CI, 20 to 48) in the sorafenib group and 20% (95% CI, 8 to 38) in the placebo group. The median time to an objective response among patients who had a response was 9.6 months (interquartile range, 6.6 to 16.7) in the sorafenib group and 13.3 months (interquartile range, 11.2 to 31.1) in the placebo group. The objective responses are ongoing. Among patients who received sorafenib, the most frequently reported adverse events were grade 1 or 2 events of rash (73%), fatigue (67%), hypertension (55%), and diarrhea (51%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with progressive, refractory, or symptomatic desmoid tumors, sorafenib significantly prolonged progression-free survival and induced durable responses. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02066181 .).

Small-cell lung cancer: a review of clinical trials.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is expected to account for 25% of the approximate 170,000 cases of lung cancer diagnosed in the United States in 2002. Although sensitive and responsive to chemotherapy, SCLC has an increased propensity for early metastases, with relapses being common and long-term survival rates being poor. Clinical trials have played a vital role in expanding our knowledge base for this disease and have resulted in newer modalities, including chemotherapeutic agents, prophylactic cranial irradiation, and thoracic radiotherapy designed to improve overall outcomes. Clinical trials have also served to clarify the role of surgery in a disease that traditionally has been thought to be nonoperable. This review will focus on the results of clinical trials that have had an effect on the treatments of patients with limited and extensive-stage SCLC, with recommendations from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network being emphasized.