Component-resolved diagnosis of baker's allergy based on specific IgE to recombinant wheat flour proteins.

BACKGROUND: Sensitization to wheat flour plays an important role in the development and diagnosis of baker's asthma. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated wheat allergen components as sensitizers for bakers with work-related complaints, with consideration of cross-reactivity to grass pollen. METHODS: Nineteen recombinant wheat flour proteins and 2 cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants were tested by using CAP-FEIA in sera of 101 bakers with wheat flour allergy (40 German, 37 Dutch, and 24 Spanish) and 29 pollen-sensitized control subjects with wheat-specific IgE but without occupational exposure. IgE binding to the single components was inhibited with wheat flour, rye flour, and grass pollen. The diagnostic efficiencies of IgE tests with single allergens and combinations were evaluated by assessing their ability to discriminate between patients with baker's allergy and control subjects based on receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: Eighty percent of bakers had specific IgE levels of 0.35 kUA/L or greater and 91% had specific IgE levels of 0.1 kUA/L or greater to at least one of the 21 allergens. The highest frequencies of IgE binding were found for thiol reductase (Tri a 27) and the wheat dimeric α-amylase inhibitor 0.19 (Tri a 28). Cross-reactivity to grass pollen was proved for 9 components, and cross-reactivity to rye flour was proved for 18 components. A combination of IgE tests to 5 components, Tri a 27, Tri a 28, tetrameric α-amylase inhibitor CM2 (Tri a 29.02), serine protease inhibitor-like allergen (Tri a 39), and 1-cys-peroxiredoxin (Tri a 32), produced the maximal area under the curve (AUC = 0.84) in receiver operating characteristic analyses, but this was still lower than the AUC for wheat- or rye flour-specific IgE (AUC = 0.89 or 0.88, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Component-resolved diagnostics help to distinguish between sensitization caused by occupational flour exposure and wheat seropositivity based on cross-reactivity to grass pollen. For routine diagnosis of baker's allergy, however, allergen-specific IgE tests with whole wheat and rye flour extracts remain mandatory because of superior diagnostic sensitivity.

Soybean allergy in patients allergic to birch pollen: clinical investigation and molecular characterization of allergens.

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to legumes are generally thought to be acquired by means of primary sensitization through the gastrointestinal tract. Recently, Gly m 4 (starvation-associated message 22), a Bet v 1-related pathogenesis-related protein 10 from soy, was suggested to be an allergen in patients with allergic reactions to a dietary product containing a soy protein isolate. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical relevance of Gly m 4 in subjects allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy and to assess the risk for subjects allergic to birch pollen to acquire soy allergy. METHODS: Twenty-two patients allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy confirmed by means of positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge results (n = 16) or a convincing history (n = 6) were investigated for IgE reactivity to birch pollen and soy allergens by using the Pharmacia CAP system and immunoblot analysis. Cross-reactivity was assessed by means of enzyme allergosorbent test inhibition. Ninety-four patients with birch pollen allergy were interviewed to assess soy tolerance and screened for IgE reactivity to Gly m 4 by means of immunoblotting. The Gly m 4 content in soy foods and soybean varieties was investigated by means of quantitative evaluation of immunoblots. RESULTS: During double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, 10 patients experienced symptoms localized to the oral cavity, and 6 patients had a more severe reaction. CAP analysis revealed Gly m 4-specific IgE in 96% (21/22) of the patients. All patients had Bet v 1-specific IgE antibodies, and 23% (5/22) had positive Bet v 2 results. In IgE immunoblotting 25% (6/22) of the patients recognized soy profilin (Gly m 3), and 64% (14/22) recognized other soy proteins. IgE binding to soy was at least 80% inhibited by birch pollen and 60% inhibited by rGly m 4 in 9 of 11 sera tested. Seventy-one percent (67/94) of highly Bet v 1-sensitized patients with birch pollen allergy were sensitized to Gly m 4, and 9 (9.6%) of those patients reported soy allergy. The Gly m 4 content in soy products ranged between 0 and 70 ppm (milligrams per kilogram). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that soybean is another birch pollen-related allergenic food. Gly m 4 is the major soy allergen for patients allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy. The content of Gly m 4 in soy food products strongly depends on the degree of food processing.