Effects of haemodynamically atrio-ventricular optimized His bundle pacing on heart failure symptoms and exercise capacity: the His Optimized Pacing Evaluated for Heart Failure (HOPE-HF) randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.

AIMS: Excessive prolongation of PR interval impairs coupling of atrio-ventricular (AV) contraction, which reduces left ventricular pre-load and stroke volume, and worsens symptoms. His bundle pacing allows AV delay shortening while maintaining normal ventricular activation. HOPE-HF evaluated whether AV optimized His pacing is preferable to no-pacing, in a double-blind cross-over fashion, in patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, PR interval ≥200 ms and either QRS ≤140 ms or right bundle branch block. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients had atrial and His bundle leads implanted (and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead if clinically indicated) and were randomized to 6 months of pacing and 6 months of no-pacing utilizing a cross-over design. The primary outcome was peak oxygen uptake during symptom-limited exercise. Quality of life, LVEF and patients' holistic symptomatic preference between arms were secondary outcomes. Overall, 167 patients were randomized: 90% men, 69 ± 10 years, QRS duration 124 ± 26 ms, PR interval 249 ± 59 ms, LVEF 33 ± 9%. Neither peak oxygen uptake (+0.25 ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.23 to +0.73, p = 0.3) nor LVEF (+0.5%, 95% CI -0.7 to 1.6, p = 0.4) changed with pacing but Minnesota Living with Heart Failure quality of life improved significantly (-3.7, 95% CI -7.1 to -0.3, p = 0.03). Seventy-six percent of patients preferred His bundle pacing-on and 24% pacing-off (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: His bundle pacing did not increase peak oxygen uptake but, under double-blind conditions, significantly improved quality of life and was symptomatically preferred by the clear majority of patients. Ventricular pacing delivered via the His bundle did not adversely impact ventricular function during the 6 months.

Persistent atrial fibrillation presenting in sinus rhythm: pulmonary vein isolation versus pulmonary vein isolation plus electrogram-guided ablation.

BACKGROUND: The classification of atrial fibrillation as paroxysmal or persistent (PsAF) is clinically useful, but does not accurately reflect the underlying pathophysiology and is therefore a suboptimal guide to selection of ablation strategy. AIM: To determine if additional substrate ablation is beneficial for a subset of patients with PsAF, in whom long periods of sinus rhythm (SR) can be maintained. METHODS: We included patients presenting with PsAF in whom continuous periods of SR>3months were documented. All patients were in SR on the day of the procedure. Electrical pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in all patients. Additional electrogram (EGM)-guided ablation was left to the discretion of the operator. Patient characteristics and follow-up were analysed with respect to presence or absence of additional EGM-guided ablation. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (mean age 60.1±8.9years; 81.5% men) met the inclusion criteria. EGM-guided ablation was performed in 32 (49%) patients. Patients with and without EGM-guided ablation had similar baseline characteristics. Absence of EGM-guided ablation was one of the independent predictors for arrhythmia recurrences after the index procedure (hazard ratio 0.24; confidence interval 0.12-0.47). After a median follow-up of 18±10months, the number of procedures required was significantly higher in the 'PVI-only' group (2.24±0.75 vs. 1.84±0.81; P=0.04) to achieve a similar success rate (84% vs. 81%; P=0.833). CONCLUSION: The addition of EGM-guided ablation requires fewer procedures to achieve similar clinical efficacy in mid-term follow-up compared with a PVI-only strategy in patients with PsAF presenting for ablation in SR.

Occurrence of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation: the significance of intra-atrial conduction and atrial vulnerability.

Atrial vulnerability and intra-atrial conduction delay are important substrates for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AFib); however, their significance is unknown in patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation. Antegrade (high right atrium to coronary sinus: HRA-CS) and retrograde (CS-HRA) intra-atrial conduction times and AFib inducibility were assessed in 61 patients undergoing ablation for type I atrial flutter. Twenty-three patients had structural heart disease and 18 AFib before the procedure. After 16 +/- 12 months of follow-up 17 patients experienced AFib, 5 of which progressed into chronic AFib. During the study, AFib was easily inducible in 14 patients, 7 of which developed AFib (P =.03). Patients with post- ablation AFib were older (59 +/- 11 vs. 44 +/- 15 years, P =.001), had longer intra-atrial conduction times before (98 +/- 17 ms vs. 68 +/- 20 ms, P <.001) and after ablation (91 +/- 19 ms vs. 73 +/- 21 ms, P =.01) than those without AFib. Discriminant analysis revealed that only age, previous AFib and inta-atrial conduction delay (>90 ms) were independent predictors of postablation AFib. Patients without a history of AFib and with normal intra-atrial conduction had a 3% risk of AFib, while patients with both factors had a 90% risk of AFib after ablation. Intra-atrial conduction delay is an important electrophysiological factor predicting atrial fibrillation after successful flutter ablation.