The APPLE Tree programme: Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle, bEhaviour change and Technology to build REsiliEnce-randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale trials of multidomain interventions show that modifying lifestyle and psychological risk factors can slow cognitive decline. We aim to determine if a lower intensity, personally tailored secondary dementia prevention programme for older people with subjective or mild objective memory decline, informed by behaviour change theory, reduces cognitive decline over 2 years. METHODS: A multi-site, single-blind randomised controlled trial recruiting 704 older adults at high dementia risk due to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Participants are randomised using 1:1 allocation ratio to the APPLE Tree intervention versus control arm (dementia prevention information), stratified by site. The intervention explores and implements strategies to promote healthy lifestyle, increase pleasurable activities and social connections and improve long-term condition self-management. Two facilitators trained and supervised by a clinical psychologist deliver ten, 1-h group video call sessions over 6 months (approximately every fortnight), video-call 'tea breaks' (less structured, facilitated social sessions) in intervening weeks and individual goal-setting phone calls every 2 weeks. From 6 to 12 months, participants meet monthly for 'tea breaks', with those not attending receiving monthly goal-setting phone calls. Participants receive a food delivery, pedometer and website access to cognitive training and information about lifestyle modification. Follow-ups for all outcome measures are at 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome is cognition (Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB) score) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and wellbeing and lifestyle factors the intervention targets (diet, vascular risk, body weight, activity, sleep, anxiety, depression, social networks and loneliness, alcohol intake and smoking). Participants from purposively selected sites participate in qualitative process evaluation interviews, which will be analysed using thematic analytic methods. DISCUSSION: If effective, the intervention design, involving remote delivery and non-clinical facilitators, would facilitate intervention roll-out to older people with memory concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17325135 . Registration date 27 November 2019.

The association between caffeine and cognitive decline: examining alternative causal hypotheses.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies suggest that higher coffee consumption may reduce the rate of aging-related cognitive decline in women. It is thus potentially a cheap and widely available candidate for prevention programs provided its mechanism may be adequately understood. The assumed effect is that of reduced amyloid deposition, however, alternative pathways notably by reducing depression and diabetes type 2 risk have not been considered. METHODS: A population study of 1,193 elderly persons examining depressive symptomatology, caffeine consumption, fasting glucose levels, type 2 diabetes onset, serum amyloid, and factors known to affect cognitive performance was used to explore alternative causal models. RESULTS: Higher caffeine consumption was found to be associated with decreased risk of incident diabetes in men (HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.97) and increased risk in women (HR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.08-2.11). No association was found with incident depression. While in the total sample lower ratio Aß42/Aß40 levels (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.77, p = 0.02) were found in high caffeine consumers, this failed to reach significance when the analyses were stratified by gender. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that reduced risk of cognitive decline in women with high caffeine consumption is moderated or confounded by diabetes or depression. The evidence of an association with plasma beta amyloid could not be clearly demonstrated. Insufficient proof of causal mechanisms currently precludes the recommendation of coffee consumption as a public health measure. Further research should focus on the high estrogen content of coffee as a plausible alternative explanation.

[Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in French general practice using the patient health questionnaire: comparison with GP case-recognition and psychotropic medication prescription]. / Prévalence des troubles psychiatriques en médecine générale selon le patient health questionnaire: adéquation avec la détection par le médecin et le traitement prescrit.

INTRODUCTION: Psychiatric disorders, mainly depression and anxiety, are frequently encountered in primary care and are a major cause of distress and disability. Nearly half of cases go unnoticed and among those that are recognised, many do not receive adequate treatment. In France, there is limited research concerning the prevalence, detection and management of these conditions in primary care. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, overall and for the main psychiatric diagnostic categories, encountered in primary care; to describe general practitioners' (GPs') case identification rate; to examine psychotropic medication prescription according to diagnosis, in a regionally representative sample of GP attenders. METHODS: GP practicing standard general practice in an urban area of the city of Montpellier and a nearby semi-rural region were recruited to participate. The response rate was 32.8% (n=41). Five additional GP almost exclusively offering homeopathy and acupuncture were recruited nonrandomly for convenience purposes. In each GP surgery, consecutive patients entering the waiting room were invited by a research assistant to participate until 25 patients per GP were recruited. Each participant completed self-report questionnaires in the waiting time, including the patient health questionnaire (PHQ), which yields provisional DSM-IV diagnoses. The GP completed a brief questionnaire during the consultation, giving his/her rating of the severity of any psychiatric disorder present and action taken. RESULTS: The patient response rate was 89.8%. In all, 14.9% of patients reached DSM-IV criteria for major depression or anxiety disorder on the PHQ (9.1% for major depression, 7.5% for panic disorder; 6% for other anxiety disorders). For the subthreshold categories, 7.4% met criteria for other depressive disorders, 11.8% for somatoform disorders and 10.9% for probable alcohol abuse or dependence. 66.3% of patients with DSM-IV diagnoses of major depression or anxiety disorder were identified by the GP as having a psychiatric disorder. The identification rate was 51% for all depressive disorders, anxiety and somatoform disorders. Of patients receiving a prescription for anxiolytic or antidepressant medication on the survey day, 80% were classified as cases of psychiatric disorder by the GP. Only 48.8% met criteria for major depression or anxiety disorder on the PHQ. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the frequency of psychiatric disorders in a regional study of French general practice. Overall, prevalence rates were similar to those found elsewhere, except for probable alcohol abuse and dependence, which was considerably higher than in the USA PHQ validation study. As in other countries, GP identified roughly half of psychiatric cases. Furthermore, half of patients treated by anxiolytic or antidepressant medication did not meet the diagnostic criteria on the survey day for which these medications have mainly shown their efficacy. This confirms the French paradox of one of the highest psychotropic medication consumption rates in Europe despite many cases of depression remaining untreated. The PHQ could be a rapid and acceptable diagnostic aid tool for French general practice but first needs to be validated against the diagnosis of mental health professionals in this setting.

The neuroprotective effects of caffeine: a prospective population study (the Three City Study).

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between caffeine intake, cognitive decline, and incident dementia in a community-based sample of subjects aged 65 years and over. METHODS: Participants were 4,197 women and 2,820 men from a population-based cohort recruited from three French cities. Cognitive performance, clinical diagnosis of dementia, and caffeine consumption were evaluated at baseline and at 2 and 4 year follow-up. RESULTS: Caffeine consumption is associated with a wide range of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables which may also affect cognitive decline. Multivariate mixed models and multivariate adjusted logistic regression indicated that women with high rates of caffeine consumption (over three cups per day) showed less decline in verbal retrieval (OR = 0.67, CI = 0.53, 0.85), and to a lesser extent in visuospatial memory (OR = 0.82, CI = 0.65, 1.03) over 4 years than women consuming one cup or less. The protective effect of caffeine was observed to increase with age (OR = 0.73, CI = 0.53, 1.02 in the age range 65 to 74; OR = 0.3, CI = 0.14, 0.63 in the range 80+). No relation was found between caffeine intake and cognitive decline in men. Caffeine consumption did not reduce dementia risk over 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: The psychostimulant properties of caffeine appear to reduce cognitive decline in women without dementia, especially at higher ages. Although no impact is observed on dementia incidence, further studies are required to ascertain whether caffeine may nonetheless be of potential use in prolonging the period of mild cognitive impairment in women prior to a diagnosis of dementia.

Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the common core competencies required for occupational physicians in Europe. METHOD: A modified Delphi survey was conducted among members of the European Association of Schools of Occupational Medicine (EASOM), the Occupational Medicine Section of the Union of European Medical Specialities (UEMS), and of the European Network of Societies of Occupational Physicians (ENSOP). An initial questionnaire based on the training syllabus of the United Kingdom Faculty of Occupational Medicine was circulated and respondents were asked to rate the importance of each item. The results were discussed at a conference on the subject of competencies. A further questionnaire was developed and circulated which asked respondents to rank items within each section. RESULTS: There was a 74% response in the first round and an 80% response in the second. Respondents' ratings from most important to least important were; occupational hazards to health, research methods, health promotion, occupational health law and ethics, communications, assessment of disability, environmental medicine, and management. In the second round, among those topics ranked most highly were; hazards to health and the illnesses which they cause, control of risks, and diagnoses of work related ill health. Topics such as principles of occupational safety and selection of personal protection equipment were of least importance. Although the assessment of fitness was regarded as important, monitoring and advising on sickness absence were not highly rated. Management competency was regarded as of low importance. CONCLUSION: This survey identified that respondents had traditional disease focused views of the competencies required of occupational physicians and that competencies were lagging behind the evolving definition of occupational health.

Are cancer patients subject to employment discrimination?

We sought to determine whether patients undergoing treatment for cancer had experienced discrimination in employment and, if so, how that discrimination was manifested. We also sought to determine what variables affected the rate of discrimination, including age, gender, occupation, and employer size. We surveyed 422 patients diagnosed with cancer who were being treated at an acute-care, comprehensive cancer center in Houston, Texas, or were being followed after therapy. Whereas 76% of respondents indicated that they were working at the time of diagnosis and 82% said that they wanted to work full- or part-time, only 56% were working at the time of the study. Type of occupation was the main determinant of whether individuals were employed after diagnosis. The study documents self-reported discrimination in employment on the basis of cancer. Additional research is needed to determined the measures, including legal recourse, necessary to enable cancer patients to obtain and continue work.

Umbilical and uterine artery blood flow velocities after vibratory acoustic stimulation.

Twelve healthy pregnant women between 37 and 41 weeks' gestational age were studied to determine the effects of external vibratory acoustic stimulation on the blood flow velocity waveform in the umbilical and uterine arteries. There was a significant decrease in umbilical peak-systolic/end-diastolic ratio during the first 5 minutes after stimulus after comparison with control ratios. Analysis of the frequency distribution of instantaneous fetal heart rate values during Doppler measurements suggested that the decrease in umbilical peak-systolic/end-diastolic ratio was due to fetal tachycardia rather than a change in the placental vascular resistance. The uterine artery peak-systolic/end-diastolic ratio was not altered after vibratory acoustic stimulation.