Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Care ; 61(Suppl 1): S12-S20, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893414

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The delivery of adult primary care (APC) shifted from predominately in-person to modes of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear how these shifts impacted the likelihood of APC use during the pandemic, or how patient characteristics may be associated with the use of virtual care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using person-month level datasets from 3 geographically disparate integrated health care systems was conducted for the observation period of January 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. We estimated a 2-stage model, first adjusting for patient-level sociodemographic, clinical, and cost-sharing factors, using generalized estimating equations with a logit distribution, along with a second-stage multinomial generalized estimating equations model that included an inverse propensity score treatment weight to adjust for the likelihood of APC use. Factors associated with APC use and virtual care use were separately assessed for the 3 sites. RESULTS: Included in the first-stage models were datasets with total person-months of 7,055,549, 11,014,430, and 4,176,934, respectively. Older age, female sex, greater comorbidity, and Black race and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with higher likelihood of any APC use in any month; measures of greater patient cost-sharing were associated with a lower likelihood. Conditional on APC use, older age, and adults identifying as Black, Asian, or Hispanic were less likely to use virtual care. CONCLUSIONS: As the transition in health care continues to evolve, our findings suggest that to ensure vulnerable patient groups receive high quality health care, outreach interventions to reduce barriers to virtual care use may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud , Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención a la Salud/métodos
2.
Med Care ; 61(Suppl 1): S21-S29, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893415

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, more health care issues were being managed remotely. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are being managed more often using telehealth although few reports compare the rate of UTI ancillary service orders placed and fulfilled during these visits. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate and compare the rate of ancillary service orders and order fulfillments in incident UTI diagnoses between virtual and in-person encounters. RESEARCH DESIGN: The retrospective cohort study involved 3 integrated health care systems: Kaiser Permanente (KP) Colorado, KP Georgia, and KP Mid-Atlantic States. SUBJECTS: We included incident UTI encounters from adult primary care data from January 2019 to June 2021. MEASURES: Data were categorized as: prepandemic (January 2019-March 2020), COVID-19 Era 1 (April 2020-June 2020), and COVID-19 Era 2 (July 2020-June 2021). UTI-specific ancillary services included medication, laboratory, and imaging. Orders and order fulfillments were dichotomized for analyses. Weighted percentages for orders and fulfillments were calculated using inverse probability treatment weighting from logistic regression and compared between virtual and in-person encounters using χ2 tests. RESULTS: We identified 123,907 incident encounters. Virtual encounters increased from 13.4% prepandemic to 39.1% in COVID-19 Era 2. Ancillary service orders from virtual encounters were not placed as often as in-person encounters. However, the weighted percentage for ancillary service order fulfillment across all services remained above 65.3% across sites and eras, with many fulfillment percentages above 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reported a high rate of order fulfillment for both virtual and in-person encounters. Health care systems should encourage providers to place ancillary service orders for uncomplicated diagnoses, such as UTI, to provide enhanced access to patient-centered care.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Georgia , Colorado/epidemiología , Telemedicina/métodos
3.
Med Care ; 61(Suppl 1): S47-S53, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893418

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The abrupt shift to virtual care at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic had the potential to disrupt care practices in virtual behavioral health encounters. We examined changes over time in virtual behavioral health-care-related practices for patient encounters with diagnoses of major depression. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic health record data from 3 integrated health care systems. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for covariates across 3 time periods, prepandemic (January 2019-March 2020), peak-pandemic shift to virtual care (April 2020-June 2020), and recovery of health care operations (July 2020-June 2021). First virtual follow-up behavioral health department encounters after an incident diagnostic encounter were examined for differences across the time periods in rates of antidepressant medication orders and fulfillments, and completion of patient-reported symptoms screeners in service of measurement-based care. RESULTS: Antidepressant medication orders declined modestly but significantly in 2 of the 3 systems during the peak-pandemic period but rebounded during the recovery period. There were no significant changes in patient fulfillment of ordered antidepressant medications. Completion of symptom screeners increased significantly in all 3 systems during the peak-pandemic period and continued to increase significantly in the subsequent period. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid shift to virtual behavioral health care was possible without compromising health-care-related practices. The transition and subsequent adjustment period have instead been marked by improved adherence to measurement-based care practices in virtual visits, signaling a potential new capacity for virtual health care delivery.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Telemedicina , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Pandemias , Depresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Satisfacción del Paciente
4.
Value Health ; 25(1): 69-76, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35031101

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is limited knowledge about the cost patterns of patients who receive a diagnosis of de novo and recurrent advanced cancers in the United States. METHODS: Data on patients who received a diagnosis of de novo stage IV or recurrent breast, colorectal, or lung cancer between 2000 and 2012 from 3 integrated health systems were used to estimate average annual costs for total, ambulatory, inpatient, medication, and other services during (1) 12 months preceding de novo or recurrent diagnosis (preindex) and (2) diagnosis month through 11 months after (postindex), from the payer perspective. Generalized linear regression models estimated costs adjusting for patient and clinical factors. RESULTS: Patients who developed a recurrence <1 year after their initial cancer diagnosis had significantly higher total costs in the preindex period than those with recurrence ≥1 year after initial diagnosis and those with de novo stage IV disease across all cancers (all P < .05). Patients with de novo stage IV breast and colorectal cancer had significantly higher total costs in the postindex period than patients with cancer recurrent in <1 year and ≥1 year (all P < .05), respectively. Patients in de novo stage IV and those with recurrence in ≥1 year experienced significantly higher postindex costs than the preindex period (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal distinct cost patterns between patients with de novo stage IV, recurrent <1-year, and recurrent ≥1-year cancer, suggesting unique care trajectories that may influence resource use and planning. Future cost studies among patients with advanced cancer should account for de novo versus recurrent diagnoses and timing of recurrence to obtain estimates that accurately reflect these care pattern complexities.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias/economía , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
Psychiatr Serv ; 73(2): 158-164, 2022 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34320822

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Mindful Mood Balance (MMB) is an effective Web-based program for residual depressive symptoms that prevents relapse among patients with partial recovery from major depressive episodes. This cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the health plan perspective alongside a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of MMB. METHODS: Adults were recruited from behavioral health and primary care settings in a large integrated health system and randomly assigned to MMB plus usual depression care (MMB+UDC) or UDC. Patients had at least one prior major depressive episode; a current score of 5-9 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, indicating residual depressive symptoms; and Internet access. Program costs included recruitment, coaching, and MMB licensing. Center for Medicare and Medicaid fee schedules were applied to electronic health record utilization data for psychotropic medications and psychiatric and psychotherapy visits. Effectiveness was measured as depression-free days (DFDs), converted from PHQ-9 scores collected monthly for 1 year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated with various sets of cost inputs. RESULTS: A total of 389 patients (UDC, N=210; MMB+UDC, N=179) had adequate follow-up PHQ-9 measures for inclusion. MMB+UDC patients had 29 more DFDs during follow-up. Overall, the incremental cost of MMB+UDC was $431.54 over 12 months. Incremental costs per DFD gained ranged from $9.63 for program costs only to $15.04 when psychiatric visits, psychotherapy visits, and psychotropic medications were included. CONCLUSIONS: MMB offers a cost-effective Web-based program for reducing residual depressive symptoms and preventing relapse. Health systems should consider adopting MMB as adjunctive to traditional mental health care services.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Internet , Medicare , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
6.
JAMIA Open ; 4(3): ooab061, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34345806

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although the value of collecting occupational data is well-established, these data are not systematically collected in clinical practice. We assessed the availability of electronic health record (EHR)-based occupation data within a large integrated health care system to determine the feasibility of its use in research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach to extract EHR data and define employment status, employer, and employment industry of 1107 colorectal cancer survivors. This was a secondary analysis of a subset of the Patient Outcomes Research to Advance Learning (PORTAL) colorectal cancer cohort. RESULTS: We categorized the employment industry for 46% of the cohort. Employment status was available for 58% of the cohort. The employer was missing for over 95% of the cohort. CONCLUSION: By combining data from structured and free-text EHR fields, we identified employment status and industry for approximately half of our sample. Findings demonstrate limitations of EHR data and underscore the need for systematic collection of occupation data in clinical practice.

7.
Transl Behav Med ; 11(3): 863-869, 2021 04 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33449120

RESUMEN

Use of digital communication technologies (DCT) shows promise for enhancing outcomes and efficiencies in asthma care management. However, little is known about the impact of DCT interventions on healthcare personnel requirements and costs, thus making it difficult for providers and health systems to understand the value of these interventions. This study evaluated the differences in healthcare personnel requirements and costs between usual asthma care (UC) and a DCT intervention (Breathewell) aimed at maintaining guidelines-based asthma care while reducing health care staffing requirements. We used data from a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial conducted in a large integrated health system involving 14,978 patients diagnosed with asthma. To evaluate differences in staffing requirements and cost between Breathewell and UC needed to deliver guideline-based care we used electronic health record (EHR) events, provider time tracking surveys, and invoicing. Differences in cost were reported at the patient and health system level. The Breathewell intervention significantly reduced personnel requirements with a larger percentage of participants requiring no personnel time (45% vs. 5%, p < .001) and smaller percentage of participants requiring follow-up outreach (44% vs. 68%, p < .001). Extrapolated to the total health system, cost for the Breathewell intervention was $16,278 less than usual care. The intervention became cost savings at a sample size of at least 957 patients diagnosed with asthma. At the population level, using DCT to compliment current asthma care practice presents an opportunity to reduce healthcare personnel requirements while maintaining population-based asthma control measures.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Teléfono Celular , Comunicación , Correo Electrónico , Personal de Salud/economía , Administración de Personal/economía , Administración de Personal/métodos , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
8.
Med Care ; 58(4): 352-359, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197029

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Challenges to health care efficiency are increasingly addressed with the help of digital communication technology tools (DCTs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test whether DCT, compared with Usual Care, can reduce health care clinician burden without increasing asthma-related exacerbations among patients with asthma in a large integrated health care system. RESEARCH DESIGN: The (Breathewell) program was a pragmatic, randomized trial at (Kaiser Permanente Colorado), where asthma nurses screen patients for poor symptom control when beta2-agonist refill requests came within 60 days of previous fill or in the absence of a controller medication fill within 4 months (beta2-agonist overfill). A total of 14,978 adults with asthma were randomized to Usual Care or 1 of 2 DCT intervention groups (Text/Phone call or Email). SUBJECTS: Participants included adults 18 and older with an asthma diagnosis at the time of randomization and no history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included asthma-related health care resource utilization (eg, asthma nurse contacts), medication use, and exacerbations. RESULTS: A total of 1933 patients had 4337 events which met beta2-agonist overfill criteria. Of the 2874 events in the intervention arm, 1188 (41%) were resolved by DCT contact and did not require additional clinician contact. Asthma medication use and exacerbations over 12 months did not differ among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: DCT tools can successfully contact adult asthma patients to screen for symptoms and facilitate intervention. The absence of differences in medication fills and health care utilization indicates that the strategic replacement of nursing interventions by digital outreach did not reduce treatment adherence or compromise health care outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Correo Electrónico , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Carga de Trabajo , Colorado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(6): 1709-1714, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32040838

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Counseling on access to lethal means is highly recommended for patients with suicide risk, but there are no formal evaluations of its impact in real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether lethal means assessment reduces the likelihood of suicide attempt and death outcomes. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design using an instrumental variable to overcome confounding due to unmeasured patient characteristics that could influence provider decisions to deliver lethal means assessment. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Colorado, an integrated health system serving over 600,000 members, with comprehensive capture of all electronic health records, medical claims, and death information. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who endorsed suicide ideation on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screener administered in behavioral health and primary care settings from 2010 to 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Provider documentation of lethal means assessment in the text of clinical notes, collected using a validated Natural Language Processing program. MEASUREMENTS: Main outcome was ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for self-inflicted injury or suicide death within 180 days of index PHQ-9 event. RESULTS: We found 33% of patients with suicide ideation reported on the PHQ-9 received lethal means assessment in the 30 days following identification. Lethal means assessment reduced the risk of a suicide attempt or death within 180 days from 3.3 to 0.83% (p = .034, 95% CI = .069-.9). LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured suicide prevention practices that co-occur with lethal means assessment may contribute to the effects observed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should expand the use of counseling on access to lethal means, along with co-occurring suicide prevention practices, to all patients who report suicide ideation.


Asunto(s)
Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio , Adulto , Colorado/epidemiología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades
10.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(4): 1143-1152, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31974902

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) requires complex processes to identify eligible patients, provide appropriate follow-up, and manage findings. It is unclear whether LCS in real-world clinical settings will realize the same benefits as the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of process modifications on compliance with LCS guidelines during LCS program implementation, and to compare patient characteristics and outcomes with those in NLST. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO), a non-profit integrated healthcare system. PATIENTS: A total of 3375 patients who underwent a baseline lung cancer screening low-dose computed tomography (S-LDCT) scan between May 2014 and June 2017. MEASUREMENTS: Among those receiving an S-LDCT, proportion who met guidelines-based LCS eligibility criteria before and after LCS process modifications, differences in patient characteristics and outcomes between KPCO LCS patients and the NLST cohort, and factors associated with a positive screen. RESULTS: After modifying LCS eligibility confirmation processes, patients receiving S-LDCT who met guidelines-based LCS eligibility criteria increased from 45.6 to 92.7% (P < 0.001). Prior to changes, patients were older (68 vs. 67 years; P = 0.001), less likely to be current smokers (51.3% vs. 52.5%; P < 0.001), and less likely to have a ≥ 30-pack-year smoking history (50.0% vs. 95.3%; P < 0.001). Compared with NLST participants, KPCO LCS patients were older (67 vs. 60 years; P < 0.001), more likely to currently smoke (52.3% vs. 48.1%; P < 0.001), and more likely to have pulmonary disease. Among those with a positive baseline S-LDCT, the lung cancer detection rate was higher at KPCO (9.4% vs. 3.8%; P < 0.001) and was positively associated with prior pulmonary disease. CONCLUSION: Adherence to LCS guidelines requires eligibility confirmation procedures. Among those with a positive baseline S-LDCT, comorbidity burden and lung cancer detection rates were notably higher than in NLST, suggesting that the study of long-term outcomes in patients undergoing LCS in real-world clinical settings is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Colorado/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumar
11.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(10): 1166-1172, 2019 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31590146

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been the standard of care for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) since 2001. However, few studies have evaluated changes in the treatment landscape of CML over time. This study assessed the long-term treatment patterns of oral anticancer therapies among patients with CML. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients newly diagnosed with CML between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, from 10 integrated healthcare systems. The proportion of patients treated with 5 FDA-approved oral TKI agents-bosutinib, dasatinib, imatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib-in the 12 months after diagnosis were measured, overall and by year, between 2000 and 2017. We assessed the use of each oral agent through the fourth-line setting. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the odds of receiving any oral agent, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Among 853 patients with CML, 81% received an oral agent between 2000 and 2017. Use of non-oral therapies decreased from 100% in 2000 to 5% in 2005, coinciding with imatinib uptake from 65% in 2001 to 98% in 2005. Approximately 28% of patients switched to a second-line agent, 9% switched to a third-line agent, and 2% switched to a fourth-line agent. Adjusted analysis showed that age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, and comorbidity burden were statistically significantly associated with odds of receiving an oral agent. CONCLUSIONS: A dramatic shift was seen in CML treatments away from traditional, nonoral chemotherapy toward use of novel oral TKIs between 2000 and 2017. As the costs of oral anticancer agents reach new highs, studies assessing the long-term health and financial outcomes among patients with CML are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
12.
Cancer Med ; 8(9): 4508-4516, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31215776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have examined melanoma incidence and survival, but studies on melanoma recurrence are limited. We examined melanoma incidence, recurrence, and mortality among members of Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2015. METHODS: Age-adjusted incidence rates were computed to examine trends among KPCO members aged 21 years and older. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine factors associated with recurrence and mortality. RESULTS: Our cohort included 1931 cases of invasive melanoma. Incidence rates increased over time and were higher than SEER rates; however, the increase was limited to early stage disease. In multivariable models, stage at initial diagnosis, gender, and age were associated with melanoma recurrence. Men were more likely to have a recurrence than women (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-2.43), and for each decade of increasing age, the adjusted HR = 1.20 (95% CI: 1.06-1.37). Factors associated with all-cause mortality included stage (HR = 12.87, 95% CI: 6.63-24.99, for stage IV vs stage I), male gender (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.12-1.79), older age at diagnosis, lower socioeconomic status, and comorbidity index. For melanoma-specific mortality, results were similar, with one exception: age was not associated with melanoma-specific death (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.94-1.25, P = 0.253). CONCLUSIONS: Data derived from an insured patient population, such as KPCO, have the potential to enhance our understanding of emerging trends in melanoma. This is the first population-based study in the United States to examine patient characteristics associated with risk of recurrence. Men have an increased risk of both recurrence and death, and thus may benefit from more intensive follow-up than women.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colorado/epidemiología , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Factores Sexuales , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Adulto Joven
13.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 3: 1-10, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30995122

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Hospitalizations are a common occurrence during chemotherapy for advanced cancer. Validated risk stratification tools could facilitate proactive approaches for reducing hospitalizations by identifying at-risk patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assembled two retrospective cohorts of patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced nonhematologic cancer; cohorts were drawn from three integrated health plans of the Cancer Research Network. We used these cohorts to develop and validate logistic regression models estimating 30-day hospitalization risk after chemotherapy initiation. The development cohort included patients in two health plans from 2005 to 2013. The validation cohort included patients in a third health plan from 2007 to 2016. Candidate predictor variables were derived from clinical data in institutional data warehouses. Models were validated based on the C-statistic, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated in reference to a prespecified risk threshold (hospitalization risk ≥ 18.0%). RESULTS: There were 3,606 patients in the development cohort (median age, 63 years) and 634 evaluable patients in the validation cohort (median age, 64 years). Lung cancer was the most common diagnosis in both cohorts (26% and 31%, respectively). The selected risk stratification model included two variables: albumin and sodium. The model C-statistic in the validation cohort was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.75); 39% of patients were classified as high risk according to the prespecified threshold; 30-day hospitalization risk was 24.2% (95% CI, 19.9% to 32.0%) in the high-risk group and 8.7% (95% CI, 6.1% to 12.0%) in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: A model based on data elements routinely collected during cancer treatment can reliably identify patients at high risk for hospitalization after chemotherapy initiation. Additional research is necessary to determine whether this model can be deployed to prevent chemotherapy-related hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Modelos Teóricos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
14.
EGEMS (Wash DC) ; 7(1): 7, 2019 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30972356

RESUMEN

The Cancer Research Network (CRN) is a consortium of 12 research groups, each affiliated with a nonprofit integrated health care delivery system, that was first funded in 1998. The overall goal of the CRN is to support and facilitate collaborative cancer research within its component delivery systems. This paper describes the CRN's 20-year experience and evolution. The network combined its members' scientific capabilities and data resources to create an infrastructure that has ultimately supported over 275 projects. Insights about the strengths and limitations of electronic health data for research, approaches to optimizing multidisciplinary collaboration, and the role of a health services research infrastructure to complement traditional clinical trials and large observational datasets are described, along with recommendations for other research consortia.

15.
Psychooncology ; 28(4): 750-758, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30703275

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Prior research examining the association between use of antidepressants after colon cancer diagnosis and risk of recurrence is scant. We evaluated this association among colon cancer patients diagnosed at two integrated health care delivery systems in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of stage I to IIIA colon cancer patients diagnosed at greater than or equal to 18 years of age at Kaiser Permanente Colorado and Kaiser Permanente Washington during 1995 to 2014. We used pharmacy records to identify dispensings for antidepressants and tumor registry records and patients' medical charts to identify cancer recurrences. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of colon cancer recurrence comparing patients who used antidepressants after diagnosis to those who did not. We also evaluated the risk associated with use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) separately. RESULTS: Among the 1923 eligible colon cancer patients, 807 (42%) used an antidepressant after diagnosis and 139 had a colon cancer recurrence during an average 5.6 years of follow-up. Use of antidepressants after colon cancer diagnosis was not associated with risk of recurrence (HR: 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.87). The HR for use of SSRIs was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.64-2.30), and for TCAs, it was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.68-2.07). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that use of antidepressants after colon cancer diagnosis was common and not associated with risk of recurrence. Future larger studies with greater power to examine risk associated with individual antidepressants would be valuable additions to the evidence base.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias del Colon/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos , Washingtón
16.
Cancer Causes Control ; 29(11): 1093-1103, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30244297

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the association between diabetes and colon cancer recurrence. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study at two integrated health care delivery systems in the United States. Using tumor registry data, we identified patients aged ≥ 18 years when diagnosed with stage I-IIIA adenocarcinomas of the colon during 1995-2014. Pre-existing diabetes was ascertained via diagnosis codes. Medical records were reviewed for eligibility and to abstract recurrence and covariate information. Recurrence was ascertained beginning 90 days after the end of colon cancer treatment (i.e., cohort entry). Recurrence of any cancer or a new primary cancer at any site was a secondary outcome. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between diabetes at cohort entry and study outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 1,923 eligible patients, 393 (16.7%) had diabetes at cohort entry. Diabetes was not associated with recurrence (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.56-1.33) or with any subsequent cancer (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.85-1.40). When the definition of recurrence included second primary colorectal cancer, risk was non-significantly higher in patients with diabetes than without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of colon cancer recurrence appears to be similar in patients with and without diabetes at diagnosis. IMPACT: Future studies should evaluate the association between diabetes and colorectal cancer outcomes, especially second primary colon cancers, in larger populations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
J Occup Environ Med ; 60(11): e569-e574, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30188491

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and measures of worker productivity, direct health care costs, and costs associated with lost productivity (LP) among health care industry workers across two integrated health care systems. METHODS: We used data from the Value Based Benefit Design Health and Wellness Study Phase II (VBD), a prospective study of employees surveyed across health systems. Survey and health care utilization data were linked to estimate LP and health care utilization costs. RESULTS: Mean marginal lost productive time per week was 0.56 hours higher for respondents with DM. Mean adjusted monthly total health care utilization costs were $467 higher for respondents with DM. CONCLUSION: The impact of DM is reflected in higher rates of LP and higher indirect costs for employers related to LP and higher health care resource use.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Eficiencia , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Absentismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presentismo , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme , Adulto Joven
18.
Urology ; 119: 70-78, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29906480

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of mortality among men treated for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARI) to those treated with alpha-blockers (AB) in community practice settings. METHODS: We employed a retrospective matched cohort study in 4 regions of an integrated healthcare system. Men aged 50 years and older who initiated pharmaceutical treatment for BPH and/or lower urinary tract symptoms between 1992 and 2008 and had at least 3 consecutive prescriptions that were eligible and followed through 2010 (N = 174,895). Adjusted hazard ratios were used to estimate the risk of mortality due to all-causes associated with 5ARI use (with or without concomitant ABs) as compared to AB use. RESULTS: In this large and diverse sample with 543,523 person-years of follow-up, 35,266 men died during the study period, 18.9% of the 5ARI users and 20.4% of the AB users. After adjustment for age, medication initiation year, race, region, prior AB history, Charlson score, and comorbidities, 5ARI use was not associated with an increased risk of mortality when compared to AB use (Adjusted hazard ratios: 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.62, 0.66). CONCLUSION: Among men receiving medications for BPH in community practice settings, 5ARI use was not associated with an increased risk of mortality when compared to AB use. These data provide reassurance about the safety of using 5ARIs in general practice to manage BPH and/or lower urinary tract symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapéutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/mortalidad , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
19.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 16(4): 402-410, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29632060

RESUMEN

Background: The high economic burden of cancer is projected to continue growing. Cost-of-care estimates are key inputs for comparative effectiveness and economic analyses that aim to inform policies associated with cancer care. Existing estimates are based largely on SEER-Medicare data in the elderly, leaving a knowledge gap regarding costs for patients aged <65 years. Methods: We estimated total and net medical care costs using data on individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer (n=45,522) and noncancer controls (n=314,887) enrolled in 1 of 4 participating health plans. Net costs were defined as the difference in mean total costs between patients with cancer and controls. The phase-of-care approach and Kaplan-Meier Sample Average method were used to estimate mean total and net 1- and 5-year costs (in 2015 US dollars) by cancer site, stage at diagnosis, and age group (<65 and ≥65 years). Results: Total and net costs were consistently highest for lung cancer and lowest for prostate cancer. Net costs were higher across all cancer sites for patients aged <65 years than those aged ≥65 years. Medical care costs for all cancers increased with advanced stage at diagnosis. Conclusions: This study improves understanding of medical care costs for the 4 most common invasive cancers in the United States. Higher costs among patients aged <65 years highlight limitations of relying on SEER-Medicare data alone to understand the national burden of cancer, whereas higher costs for patients with advanced-stage cancer underscore the importance of early detection to curtail high long-term costs. These cost estimates can be used in the development and evaluation of interventions and policies across the cancer care continuum.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 14(12): 1827-1835, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28683215

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Lung cancer screening registries can monitor screening outcomes and improve quality of care. OBJECTIVES: To describe nascent lung cancer screening programs and share efficient data collection approaches for mandatory registry reporting in four integrated health care systems of the National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Research Network. METHODS: We documented the distinctive characteristics of lung cancer screening programs, and we provide examples of strategies to facilitate data collection and describe early challenges and possible solutions. In addition, we report preliminary data on use and outcomes of screening with low-dose computed tomography at each of the participating sites. RESULTS: Programs varied in approaches to confirming patient eligibility, ordering screening low-dose computed tomographic scans, and coordinating follow-up care. Most data elements were collected from structured fields in electronic health records, but sites also made use of standardized order templates, local procedure codes, identifiable hashtags in radiology reports, and natural language processing algorithms. Common challenges included incomplete documentation of tobacco smoking history, difficulty distinguishing between scans performed for screening versus diagnosis or surveillance, and variable adherence with use of standardized templates. Adherence with eligibility criteria as well as the accuracy and completeness of data collection appeared to depend at least partly on availability of personnel and other resources to support the successful implementation of screening. CONCLUSIONS: To maximize the effectiveness of lung cancer screening, minimize the burden of data collection, and facilitate research and quality improvement, clinical workflow and information technology should be purposefully designed to ensure that patients meet eligibility criteria and receive appropriate follow-up testing.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sistema de Registros , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA