Ceftazidime, Carbapenems, or Piperacillin-tazobactam as Single Definitive Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infection: A Multisite Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antibiotic regimen for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia is controversial. Although ß-lactam monotherapy is common, data to guide the choice between antibiotics are scarce. We aimed to compare ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive monotherapy. METHODS: A multinational retrospective study (9 countries, 25 centers) including 767 hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia treated with ß-lactam monotherapy during 2009-2015. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate, including propensity-adjusted, analyses were conducted introducing monotherapy type as an independent variable. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 37/213 (17.4%), 42/210 (20%), and 55/344 (16%) in the ceftazidime, carbapenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam groups, respectively. Type of monotherapy was not significantly associated with mortality in either univariate, multivariate, or propensity-adjusted analyses (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-2.46, for ceftazidime; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.67-2.51, for piperacillin-tazobactam, with carbapenems as reference in propensity adjusted multivariate analysis; 542 patients). No significant difference between antibiotics was demonstrated for clinical failure, microbiological failure, or adverse events. Isolation of P. aeruginosa with new resistance to antipseudomonal drugs was significantly more frequent with carbapenems (36/206 [17.5%]) versus ceftazidime (25/201 [12.4%]) and piperacillin-tazobactam (28/332 [8.4%] (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in mortality, clinical, and microbiological outcomes or adverse events was demonstrated between ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive treatment of P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Higher rates of resistant P. aeruginosa after patients were treated with carbapenems, along with the general preference for carbapenem-sparing regimens, suggests using ceftazidime or piperacillin-tazobactam for treating susceptible infection.

Activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against multidrug-resistance Enterobacteriaceae expressing combined mechanisms of resistance / Actividad de ceftazidima/avibactam en enterobacterias multirresistentes con mecanismos de resistencia combinados

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is increasing worldwide and is making treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae a challenge. The use of Beta -lactam agents is compromised by microorganisms harboring extended-spectrum Beta -lactamases (ESBLs) and other mechanisms of resistance. Avibactam is a non Beta -lactam agent that inhibits clinically relevant Beta -lactamases, such as ESBL and AmpC. The ceftazidime-avibactam combination (CAZ-AVI) was recently approved for use in certain complicated infections, and may provide a therapeutic alternative for infections caused by these microorganisms. Methods: The in vitro activity of CAZ and CAZ-AVI (AVI at a fixed concentration of 4mg/L) was tested against 250 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae using broth microdilution. EUCAST breakpoint criteria were used for CAZ, and FDA criteria for CAZ-AVI. Clinical isolates included bacteria producing extended-spectrum Beta -lactamases (ESBLs) and acquired AmpC Beta -lactamases (AACBLs). Porin loss in Klebsiella pneumoniae was also evaluated. Results: The combination of AVI with CAZ displayed excellent activity against clinical isolates of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, rendering all the ceftazidime-resistant isolates susceptible to ceftazidime. CAZ-AVI retained activity against porin-deficient isolates of K. pneumoniae producing ESBLs, AACBLs, or both, although MIC values were higher compared to porin-expressing isolates. CAZ-AVI rendered all the ceftazidime-resistant AACBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae tested susceptible to ceftazidime. Conclusion: CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceaeproducing ESBLs and/or AACBLs, including K. pneumoniae with loss of porins (AU)

Introducción: La resistencia antibiótica en enterobacterias está en aumento y el tratamiento de infecciones producidas por enterobacterias multirresistentes supone un reto terapéutico. El uso de betalactámicos se afecta con la producción de betalactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE) y otros mecanismos de resistencia. Avibactam es un compuesto no betalactámico que inhibe betalactamasas como BLEE o AmpC. La combinación ceftazidima-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) ha sido aprobada recientemente para el tratamiento de infecciones complicadas y puede ser una alternativa terapéutica en estas infecciones. Métodos: La actividad in vitro de CAZ y CAZ-AVI (AVI, concentración fija de 4mg/mL) fue determinada en 250 aislamientos clínicos de enterobacterias mediante microdilución en caldo. Los puntos de corte de EUCAST fueron utilizados para CAZ, y los criterios de FDA se utilizaron para CAZ-AVI. Las enterobacterias estudiadas producían BLEE y/o AmpC adquiridas (BLAA). El papel de la pérdida de porinas en Klebsiella pneumoniae también fue evaluado. Resultados: CAZ-AVI demostró una excelente actividad en Escherichia coli y Klebsiella pneumoniaeproductoras de BLEE, devolviendo la sensibilidad a CAZ en todos los aislamientos resistentes a CAZ. CAZ-AVI mantuvo su actividad en aislamientos de K. pneumoniae deficientes en porinas productoras de BLEE y/o BLAA, aunque los valores de CMI fueron más altos comparados con las cepas que expresaban porinas. En todas las enterobacterias resistentes a ceftazidima productoras de BLAA analizadas en este estudio CAZ-AVI devolvió la sensibilidad a ceftazidima. Conclusión: CAZ-AVI demostró una potente actividad in vitro en aislamientos clínicos de enterobacterias productoras de BLEE y/o BLAA, incluyendo K. pneumoniae con pérdida de porinas (AU)