Chromium, nickel, and cobalt in cosmetic matrices: an integrated bioanalytical characterization through total content, bioaccessibility, and Cr(III)/Cr(VI) speciation.

The presence of certain metals naturally contained inside raw materials (e.g., pigments) used to produce cosmetics for make-up may represent a serious concern for the final quality and safety of the product. The knowledge of the total concentration of metals is not sufficient to predict their reactivity and their toxicological profile. For these reasons, we set up a comprehensive approach to characterize the content of Co, Cr, and Ni in two raw materials for cosmetic production, a black iron oxide and a pearly pigment, and in a finished product, pearly powder eye shadow. Namely, besides the total metal concentrations, the speciation of chromium and the bioaccessibility of the three metals were assessed. Since no standard method is so far available for hexavalent chromium extraction from cosmetic samples, three approaches were compared (EPA 3060A method, IRSA 16 method, and a Na3PO4 extraction). Results show that Na3PO4 extraction is the most selective one. Cr(VI) was undetectable in black iron oxide and present at very low concentrations (about 0.3 mg/kg) in pearly pigment and in the pearly powder eye shadow samples. The extracted Cr(VI) concentrations are not related to the total Cr content in the samples. Bioaccessibility studies were performed by in vitro extractions with synthetic lacrimal fluids and sweat. Despite the wide range of metal concentrations in the samples, the amounts of bioaccessible elements were undetectable or very low (less than 0.4 mg/kg), thus suggesting that metals in the three samples are present in inert forms. Graphical abstract The possible leaching of metals from cosmetics to biological fluids. Spectroscopic and chromatographic techniques provide complementary information for an integrated bioanalytical approach to risk characterization.

New approaches for extraction and determination of betaine from Beta vulgaris samples by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Betaine is one of most studied biologically active compounds, due its role in the main biological processes. Although it may be found in several plants and roots, such as the Beta vulgaris family, present in typical diets, just a few analytical methods have been developed for its extraction from roots. A new, quick and effective procedure for the isolation and determination of betaine from two different varieties of B. vulgaris (red and gold) is presented. For betaine extraction, an accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) was coupled with solid-phase extraction. For betaine determination, a separation method based on hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was optimized for a sensible detection of betaine by means of experimental design. Recoveries were about 93%, with RSD <5%, for both the matrices, without evidence of interfering species. The total content of betaine in extracts of various parts of plants (juice, peel, root) have been determined, obtaining concentrations in the range 3000-4000 mg/L for the juice and in the range 2-5 mg/g for the pulp and for the peel. The B. vulgaris gold species exhibited a higher concentration of betaine, compared to the red variety. Additionally, a micro extraction by packed sorbent technique and a modified quick, easy, cheap, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) procedure, were also tested and compared. Despite the lower recoveries of the latter, with respect to the ASE/SPE procedure (75-89%, RSD <1.5%), the ease of the method, which can be applied without the SPE purification procedure, can represent a positive improvement. Graphical abstract Determination of betaine from Beta vulgaris samples.

QuEChERS sample preparation for the determination of pesticides and other organic residues in environmental matrices: a critical review.

Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) is an extraction and clean-up technique originally developed for recovering pesticide residues from fruits and vegetables. Since its introduction, and until December 2013, about 700 papers have been published using the QuEChERS technique, according to a literature overview carried out using SciFinder, Elsevier SciVerse, and Google search engines. Most of these papers were dedicated to pesticide multiresidue analysis in food matrices, and this topic has been thoroughly reviewed over recent years. The QuEChERS approach is now rapidly developing beyond its original field of application to analytes other than pesticides, and matrices other than food, such as biological fluids and non-edible plants, including Chinese medicinal plants. Recently, the QuEChERS concept has spread to environmental applications by analyzing not only pesticides but also other compounds of environmental concern in soil, sediments, and water. To the best of our knowledge, QuEChERS environmental applications have not been reviewed so far; therefore, in this contribution, after a general discussion on the evolution and changes of the original QuEChERS method, a critical survey of the literature regarding environmental applications of conventional and modified QuEChERS methodology is provided. The overall recoveries obtained with QuEChERS and other extraction approaches (e.g., accelerated solvent extraction, ultrasonic solvent extraction, liquid/solid extraction, and soxhlet extraction) were compared, providing evidence for QuEChERS higher recoveries for various classes of compounds, such as biopesticides, chloroalkanes, phenols, and perfluoroalkyl substances. The role of physicochemical properties of soil (i.e., clay and organic carbon content, as well as cation exchange capacity) and target analytes (i.e., log KOW, water solubility, and vapor pressure) were also evaluated in order to interpret recovery and matrix effect data.