Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 56(6): 841-846, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32567782

RESUMEN

In 2016, a global consensus on the prevention, diagnosis and management of nutritional rickets was published. The bone and mineral working group of the Australasian Paediatric Endocrine Group provides a summary and highlights differences to previous Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) guidelines on vitamin D deficiency and their implications for clinicians. Key points are: (i) The International Consensus document is focused on nutritional rickets, whereas the ANZ guidelines were focused on vitamin D deficiency. (ii) Definitions for the interpretation of 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) levels do not differ between statements. (iii) The global consensus recommends that routine 25OHD screening should not be performed in healthy children and recommendations for vitamin D supplementation are not based solely on 25OHD levels. The Australasian Paediatric Endocrine Group bone and mineral working group supports that screening for vitamin D deficiency should be restricted to populations at risk. (iv) Recommendations from the global consensus for vitamin D dosages for the therapy of nutritional rickets (diagnosed based on history, physical examination, biochemical testing and a confirmation by X-rays) are higher than in ANZ publications. (v) The global consensus recommends the implementation of public health strategies such as universal supplementation with vitamin D from birth to 1 year of age and food fortification. We conclude that updated global recommendations for therapy of nutritional rickets complement previously published position statements for Australia and New Zealand. Screening, management and the implementation of public health strategies need to be further explored for Australia.


Asunto(s)
Raquitismo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D , Australia , Niño , Consenso , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda , Raquitismo/diagnóstico , Raquitismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Raquitismo/prevención & control , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/prevención & control
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30781827

RESUMEN

Ensuring that the entire Australian population is Vitamin D sufficient is challenging, given the wide range of latitudes spanned by the country, its multicultural population and highly urbanised lifestyle of the majority of its population. Specific issues related to the unique aspects of vitamin D metabolism during pregnancy and infancy further complicate how best to develop a universally safe and effective public health policy to ensure vitamin D adequacy for all. Furthermore, as Australia is considered a "sunny country", it does not yet have a national vitamin D food supplementation policy. Rickets remains very uncommon in Australian infants and children, however it has been recognised for decades that infants of newly arrived immigrants remain particularly at risk. Yet vitamin D deficiency rickets is entirely preventable, with the caveat that when rickets occurs in the absence of preexisting risk factors and/or is poorly responsive to adequate treatment, consideration needs to be given to genetic forms of rickets.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Salud Pública , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/epidemiología , Vitamina D/análisis , Vitaminas/análisis , Australia/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Raquitismo/epidemiología , Raquitismo/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Luz Solar , Vitamina D/fisiología , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/prevención & control , Vitaminas/fisiología
4.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 53(2): 163-169, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27670154

RESUMEN

AIM: There are no published data to demonstrate the efficacy of bolus dose vitamin D in newborn infants. The study sought to evaluate this alternative approach of supplementation. METHODS: This single centre, open randomised controlled trial was conducted from August 2013 to May 2014. It compared the efficacy and safety of daily (400 IU) versus a bolus dose (50 000 IU) of cholecalciferol in newborn infants of vitamin D deficient mothers. The primary outcome measure was the rate of 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) repletion-defined as 25OHD greater than 50 nmol/L. The secondary objective was determining safety using adjusted total serum calcium. RESULTS: Of 70 eligible infants, 36 received a daily dose and 34 received a single high-dose cholecalciferol. Mean 25OHD in the bolus group (154 nmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) 131-177) was higher than the daily group (48 nmol/L, 95% CI 42-54) at 1-2 weeks of age. This was reversed at 3-4 months, (65 nmol/L, 95% CI 59-71) compared with the daily group (81 nmol/L, 95% CI 77-85). More infants in the single bolus group achieved vitamin D repletion (100 vs. 31%) at 1-2 weeks. By 3-4 months, both groups achieved similar vitamin D repletion rates (91 vs. 89%). Mean adjusted total serum calcium in the bolus group were normal at 1-2 weeks (2.73 mmol/L) and 3-4 months (2.55 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: Single bolus dosing of 50 000 IU cholecalciferol achieves higher 25OHD repletion rates at 1-2 weeks of age compared with daily dosing, but repletion rates were similar by 3-4 months. There was no hypercalcaemia documented with single bolus dosing in this study.


Asunto(s)
Administración Oral , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Australia , Calcio/sangre , Suplementos Dietéticos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
5.
Bone Rep ; 5: 153-157, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28326355

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine vitamin D deficiency risk and other lifestyle factors in children aged 2-17 years presenting with an acute fracture to Sunshine Hospital. METHODS: A prospective observational study was undertaken using a convenience sample data collected from children aged 2-17 years of age presenting with an acute fracture. Recruitment was undertaken over a 3-month period from February to May 2014. Risk factors for vitamin D deficiency (skin pigmentation, hours spent outdoors, sunscreen use and obesity) were identified. Patients providing consent, had measurements of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD). Vitamin D deficiency was defined as < 50 nmol/L. RESULTS: Of the 163 patients recruited into this study, 134 (82%) had one or more risk factor(s) for vitamin D deficiency. Of these, 109 (81%) consented to 25-OHD testing, with a median of 53 nmol/l (range 14-110 nmol/l) obtained. A total of 57 (52% at risk, 35% of total participants) were found to be vitamin D deficient. 45 (80%) had mild deficiency (30-50 nmol/l) and 11 (20%) had moderate deficiency (12.5-29 nmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: One third of all participants, and the majority participants who had one or more risk factor(s) for vitamin D deficiency, were vitamin D deficient. Based on our findings we recommend that vitamin D status be assessed in all children with risk factor of vitamin D deficiency living in urban environments at higher latitudes presenting with fractures. The effect of vitamin D status on fracture risk and fracture healing in children and teenagers is yet to be determined, as do the effects of vitamin D supplementation in vitamin D deficient paediatric patients presenting with acute fracture.

6.
Med J Aust ; 198(3): 142-3, 2013 Feb 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23418693

RESUMEN

• The recommended level for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) in infants, children, adolescents and during pregnancy and lactation is ≥ 50 nmol/L. This level may need to be 10-20 nmol/L higher at the end of summer to maintain levels ≥ 50 nmol/L over winter and spring. • Sunlight is the most important source of vitamin D. The US recommended dietary allowance for vitamin D is 600 IU daily in children aged over 12 months and during pregnancy and lactation, assuming minimal sun exposure. • Risk factors for low vitamin D are: lack of skin exposure to sunlight, dark skin, southerly latitude, conditions affecting vitamin D metabolism and storage (including obesity) and, for infants, being born to a mother with low vitamin D and exclusive breastfeeding combined with at least one other risk factor. • Targeted measurement of 25(OH)D levels is recommended for infants, children and adolescents with at least one risk factor for low vitamin D and for pregnant women with at least one risk factor for low vitamin D at the first antenatal visit. • Vitamin D deficiency can be treated with daily low-dose vitamin D supplements, although barriers to adherence have been identified. High-dose intermittent vitamin D can be used in children and adolescents. Treatment should be paired with health education and advice about sensible sun exposure. Infants at risk of low vitamin D should be supplemented with 400 IU vitamin D3 daily for at least the first year of life. • There is increasing evidence of an association between low vitamin D and a range of non-bone health outcomes, however there is a lack of data from robust randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation.


Asunto(s)
Vitamina D/sangre , Vitaminas/sangre , Adolescente , Australia/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Vitamina D/fisiología , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/epidemiología , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/terapia , Vitaminas/fisiología
7.
Med J Aust ; 185(5): 268-72, 2006 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16948623

RESUMEN

Vitamin D deficiency has re-emerged as a significant paediatric health issue, with complications including hypocalcaemic seizures, rickets, limb pain and fracture. A major risk factor for infants is maternal vitamin D deficiency. For older infants and children, risk factors include dark skin colour, cultural practices, prolonged breastfeeding, restricted sun exposure and certain medical conditions. To prevent vitamin D deficiency in infants, pregnant women, especially those who are dark-skinned or veiled, should be screened and treated for vitamin D deficiency, and breastfed infants of dark-skinned or veiled women should be supplemented with vitamin D for the first 12 months of life. Regular sunlight exposure can prevent vitamin D deficiency, but the safe exposure time for children is unknown. To prevent vitamin D deficiency, at-risk children should receive 400 IU vitamin D daily; if compliance is poor, an annual dose of 150,000 IU may be considered. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency involves giving ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol for 3 months (1000 IU/day if < 1 month of age; 3000 IU/day if 1-12 months of age; 5000 IU/day if > 12 months of age). High-dose bolus therapy (300,000-500,000 IU) should be considered for children over 12 months of age if compliance or absorption issues are suspected.


Asunto(s)
Deficiencia de Vitamina D/terapia , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Australia , Niño , Preescolar , Dieta , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Nueva Zelanda , Luz Solar , Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/etiología , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/prevención & control
8.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 37(2): 116-21, 2004 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14730656

RESUMEN

Significant concern remains over the long-term side effects of inhaled steroids. This cross-sectional study evaluates the effect of high-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) on biochemical markers of bone metabolism and bone density in children with asthma. Children with chronic asthma using FP >/= 1,000 mcg daily for at least 6 months, and healthy controls, were entered in the study. No children had taken oral prednisolone within the previous month. Fasting morning serum was analyzed for bone formation markers, and spot urine for bone resorption markers. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) results were reviewed in a subgroup of patients. Forty-nine children with asthma and 32 controls were recruited. The mean FP dose was 771.2 +/- 253.35 mcg/m2/day. Unpaired t-test analysis revealed no significant difference in biochemical markers studied. In subjects with asthma; 13 of 37 (35.1%) had lumbar spine density more than one standard deviation below the mean (P = 0.001). This fell to 6/37 (16.2%) with bone age correction (NS). In conclusion, no significant reduction in bone metabolism or bone age-corrected bone mineral density was observed in children with asthma on prolonged high doses of inhaled FP.


Asunto(s)
Androstadienos/farmacología , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Huesos/metabolismo , Broncodilatadores/farmacología , Absorciometría de Fotón , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Androstadienos/administración & dosificación , Androstadienos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Índice de Masa Corporal , Remodelación Ósea/fisiología , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Fluticasona , Humanos , Masculino , Osteocalcina/sangre , Esteroides/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA