The Disturbed Iron Phenotype of Tumor Cells and Macrophages in Renal Cell Carcinoma Influences Tumor Growth.

Accumulating evidence suggests that iron homeostasis is disturbed in tumors. We aimed at clarifying the distribution of iron in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Considering the pivotal role of macrophages for iron homeostasis and their association with poor clinical outcome, we investigated the role of macrophage-secreted iron for tumor progression by applying a novel chelation approach. We applied flow cytometry and multiplex-immunohistochemistry to detect iron-dependent markers and analyzed iron distribution with atomic absorption spectrometry in patients diagnosed with RCC. We further analyzed the functional significance of iron by applying a novel extracellular chelator using RCC cell lines as well as patient-derived primary cells. The expression of iron-regulated genes was significantly elevated in tumors compared to adjacent healthy tissue. Iron retention was detected in tumor cells, whereas tumor-associated macrophages showed an iron-release phenotype accompanied by enhanced expression of ferroportin. We found increased iron amounts in extracellular fluids, which in turn stimulated tumor cell proliferation and migration. In vitro, macrophage-derived iron showed pro-tumor functions, whereas application of an extracellular chelator blocked these effects. Our study provides new insights in iron distribution and iron-handling in RCC. Chelators that specifically scavenge iron in the extracellular space confirmed the importance of macrophage-secreted iron in promoting tumor growth.

Amygdalin Modulates Prostate Cancer Cell Adhesion and Migration In Vitro.

The natural compound, amygdalin, is notably popular with prostate cancer patients as an alternative or complementary treatment option. However, knowledge about its mode of action is sparse. We investigated amygdalin's impact on prostate cancer adhesion and motile behavior. DU-145 and PC3 cancer cells were exposed to amygdalin. Adhesion to human vascular endothelium or immobilized collagen was then explored. The influence of amygdalin on chemotaxis and migration was also investigated, as well as amygdalin induced alteration to surface and total cellular α and ß integrin expression. Integrin knockdown was performed to evaluate the integrin influence on chemotaxis and adhesion. Amygdalin significantly reduced chemotactic activity, migration, and adhesion of DU-145 but not of PC3 cells. Amygdalin elevated integrin α2 in both cell lines. Integrin α6 was reduced by amygdalin only in DU-145 cells, whereas ß1 increased only in PC3 cells. Functional blocking revealed a negative association of α2 with PC3 and DU-145 chemotaxis. The ß1 increase correlated with enhanced chemotaxis, the diminished α6 expression with reduced chemotaxis. Amygdalin acted on prostate cancer cells in vitro. It induced downregulation of α6 integrin in DU-145 but not in PC3 cells, suggesting that exposing certain prostate cancer cells to amygdalin might inhibit metastatic spread promoted by this particular integrin.

Cyanide and lactate levels in patients during chronic oral amygdalin intake followed by intravenous amygdalin administration.

The natural compound amygdalin has gained high popularity among tumor patients as a complementary or alternative treatment option. However, due to metabolization of amygdalin to cyanide (HCN) following oral consumption, there could be a high risk of lactic acidosis caused by cyanide intoxication. The present retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate cyanide blood and lactate plasma levels of tumor patients (n = 55) before and after intravenous (i.v.) amygdalin infusion. All patients had also continuously ingested amygdalin tablets (3 x 500 mg/day), excepting on the days of i.v. administration. Each patient received one to five intravenous amygdalin treatments. The time period between each i.v. application ranged between 4-6 days. The initial i.v. dose was 6 mg (n = 28), 9 mg (n = 1), 15 mg (n = 1) or 18 mg (n = 25). The mean cyanide blood level before i.v. amygdalin administration was 34.74 µg/L, which increased significantly to a mean value of 66.20 µg/L after i. v. amygdalin application. In contrast, lactate decreased significantly from 1266 µmol/L pre-infusion to 868 µmol/L post-infusion. Increasing i.v. amygdalin by 1 mg was also associated with a significant increase in the cyanide level, while the lactate blood level significantly decreased. This is the first study evaluating cyanide levels under conditions employed by amygdalin administrators, i.e. after chronic oral amygdalin intake and then again after a closely subsequent intravenous amygdalin administration. Since lactate decreased, whilst cyanide increased, it is concluded that elevation of cyanide does not induce metabolic acidosis in terms of an increased lactate level.

The Antitumor Effect of Curcumin in Urothelial Cancer Cells Is Enhanced by Light Exposure In Vitro.

The natural compound curcumin exerts antitumor properties in vitro, but its clinical application is limited due to low bioavailability. Light exposure in skin and skin cancer cells has been shown to improve curcumin bioavailability; thus, the object of this investigation was to determine whether light exposure might also enhance curcumin efficacy in bladder cancer cell lines. RT112, UMUC3, and TCCSUP cells were preincubated with low curcumin concentrations (0.1-0.4 µg/ml) and then exposed to 1.65 J/cm2 visible light for 5 min. Cell growth, cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle progression, and cell cycle regulating proteins along with acetylation of histone H3 and H4 were investigated. Though curcumin alone did not alter cell proliferation or apoptosis, tumor cell growth and proliferation were strongly blocked when curcumin was combined with visible light. Curcumin-light caused the bladder cancer cells to become arrested in different cell phases: G0/G1 for RT112, G2/M for TCCSUP, and G2/M- and S-phase for UMUC3. Proteins of the Cdk-cyclin axis were diminished in RT112 after application of 0.1 and 0.4 µg/ml curcumin. Cell cycling proteins were upregulated in TCCSUP and UMUC3 in the presence of 0.1 µg/ml curcumin-light but were partially downregulated with 0.4 µg/ml curcumin. 0.4 µg/ml (but not 0.1 µg/ml) curcumin-light also evoked late apoptosis in TCCSUP and UMUC3 cells. H3 and H4 acetylation was found in UMUC3 cells treated with 0.4 µg/ml curcumin alone or with 0.1 µg/ml curcumin-light, pointing to an epigenetic mechanism. Light exposure enhanced the antitumor potential of curcumin on bladder cancer cells but by different molecular action modes in the different cell lines. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether intravesical curcumin application, combined with visible light, might become an innovative tool in combating bladder cancer.

Sulforaphane as an adjunctive to everolimus counteracts everolimus resistance in renal cancer cell lines.

BACKGROUND: The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus and temsirolimus, have widened therapeutic options to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, chronic treatment with these inhibitors often induces resistance, leading to therapeutic failure. PURPOSE: The natural compound, sulforaphane (SFN), was added to an everolimus based regime in vitro in the hopes of preventing resistance development. METHODS: A panel of RCC cell lines (A498, Caki-1, KTCTL-26) was treated with everolimus or SFN or with an everolimus-SFN-combination, either short- (24h) or long-term (8 weeks), and cell growth, proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle phases were measured. The cell cycle regulating proteins cdk1, cdk2, cyclin A, cyclin B, akt and raptor (both total and activated) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Short-term incubation with everolimus (1nM) or SFN (5µM) significantly reduced RCC cell growth. Additive effects on tumor growth and proliferation were evoked by the SFN-everolimus combination. Long-term everolimus-incubation led to resistance development in Caki-1 cells, evidenced by elevated growth and proliferation, associated with an increased percentage of G2/M (non-synchronized cell model) or S-phase (synchronized cell model) cells. Molecular analysis revealed up-regulation of the cdk1-cyclin B and cdk2-cyclin A axis, along with elevated phosphorylation of the mTOR sub-member, raptor. In contrast, resistance development was not observed with the long-term combination of SFN-everolimus. The combination suppressed Caki-1 growth and proliferation, and was associated with an increase in G0/G1-phase cells, diminished cdk1 and akt (both total and activated), cyclin B and raptor expression. CONCLUSION: Adding SFN to an everolimus based RCC treatment regimen in vitro delayed resistance development observed with chronic everolimus monotherapy. Ongoing in vivo studies are necessary to verify the in vitro data.

Sulforaphane inhibits proliferation and invasive activity of everolimus-resistant kidney cancer cells in vitro.

Although the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus, has improved the outcome of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), improvement is temporary due to the development of drug resistance. Since many patients encountering resistance turn to alternative/complementary treatment options, an investigation was initiated to evaluate whether the natural compound, sulforaphane (SFN), influences growth and invasive activity of everolimus-resistant (RCCres) compared to everolimus-sensitive (RCCpar) RCC cell lines in vitro. RCC cells were exposed to different concentrations of SFN and cell growth, cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, cell cycle regulating proteins, the mTOR-akt signaling axis, adhesion to human vascular endothelium and immobilized collagen, chemotactic activity, and influence on surface integrin receptor expression were investigated. SFN caused a significant reduction in both RCCres and RCCpar cell growth and proliferation, which correlated with an elevation in G2/M- and S-phase cells. SFN induced a marked decrease in the cell cycle activating proteins cdk1 and cyclin B and siRNA knock-down of cdk1 and cyclin B resulted in significantly diminished RCC cell growth. SFN also modulated adhesion and chemotaxis, which was associated with reduced expression of the integrin subtypes α5, α6, and ß4. Distinct differences were seen in RCCres adhesion and chemotaxis (diminished by SFN) and RCCpar adhesion (enhanced by SFN) and chemotaxis (not influenced by SFN). Functional blocking of integrin subtypes demonstrated divergent action on RCC binding and invasion, depending on RCC cell sensitivity to everolimus. Therefore, SFN administration could hold potential for treating RCC patients with established resistance towards everolimus.