Vitamin D status and bone mineral density changes during alendronate treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Vitamin D supplementation is recommended for women with osteoporosis. In the FOCUS-D trial comparing the combination tablet alendronate plus vitamin D3 5,600 IU (ALN/D) with standard care (SC) prescribed by patients' personal physicians, ALN/D was more effective in improving serum 25(OH)D and bone turnover markers by 6 months and increasing spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) after 1 year than SC. This post hoc analysis examined the relationship between BMD gain and 25(OH)D in women in SC receiving alendronate (SC/ALN, n = 134, 52% of the SC group) and in the ALN/D group (n = 257). At baseline, participants were of mean age 73 years and 72% were Caucasian, with a mean 25(OH)D of 14.9 ng/mL. In the SC/ALN group, most received vitamin D, although intake of vitamin D varied extensively (51% received <400 µg/day). In this group, end-of-study 25(OH)D correlated positively with mean percent increases from baseline in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD [Pearson correlation coefficients (95% CI) = 0.23 (0.02-0.41) and 0.24 (0.03-0.41), respectively]. Baseline 25(OH)D correlated with increases in only lumbar spine BMD [Pearson correlation coefficient (95% CI) = 0.22 (0.01-0.40)]. No correlations between mean BMD change and 25(OH)D were seen with ALN/D. In conclusion, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and low 25(OH)D receiving alendronate and a wide range of vitamin D doses, the increase in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD was positively correlated with serum 25(OH)D achieved by the end of the study and, to some extent, with 25(OH)D concentrations at baseline. The degree of success of alendronate therapy for osteoporosis may depend on the vitamin D status of patients.

Randomized trial of alendronate plus vitamin D3 versus standard care in osteoporotic postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency.

Vitamin D insufficiency is common in patients with osteoporosis. We conducted a randomized trial comparing alendronate 70 mg combined with vitamin D(3) 5,600 IU in a single tablet (ALN/D5600, n = 257) with standard care chosen by the patients' personal physicians (n = 258) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (BMD T score ≤2.5 or ≤1.5 and a prior fragility fracture) who had vitamin D insufficiency (serum 25[OH]D values 8-20 ng/ml) and who were at risk of falls. Virtually all patients randomized to standard care received bisphosphonate therapy, and in approximately 70% of cases this was combined with vitamin D supplements. However, only 24% took ≥800 IU/day of supplemental vitamin D. At 6 months the proportion of patients with vitamin D insufficiency was 8.6% in the ALN/D5600 group compared with 31.0% in the standard care group (P < 0.001). Those in the ALN/D5600 group also had a greater reduction in urinary NTX/creatinine ratio (-57% vs. -46%, P < 0.001) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (-47% vs. -40%, P < 0.001). In the ALN/5600 group, by 12 months the increase in BMD was greater at the lumbar spine (4.9% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.047) and the total hip (2.2% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.035), significantly fewer patients were vitamin D-insufficient (11.3% vs. 36.9%, P < 0.001), and bone turnover marker (BTM) results were similar to those at 6 months. There was no difference between groups in those who experienced falls or fractures, and adverse events were similar. Based on the finding that ALN/D5600 was more effective than standard care at correcting vitamin D insufficiency, increasing BMD, and reducing BTMs in this patient group, greater attention needs to be directed toward optimizing the treatment of osteoporosis and correcting vitamin D deficiency in postmenopausal women.

Once-weekly dose of 8400 IU vitamin D(3) compared with placebo: effects on neuromuscular function and tolerability in older adults with vitamin D insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D insufficiency, which is prevalent in older individuals, is associated with bone and muscle weakness and falls. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of a weekly dose of 8400 IU vitamin D(3) on postural stability, muscle strength, and safety. DESIGN: In this double-blind trial, subjects aged > or =70 y with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations < or =20 but > or =6 ng/mL were randomly assigned to receive a weekly dose of 8400 IU vitamin D(3) (n = 114) or a placebo (n = 112). Mediolateral body sway with eyes open (assessed with the AccuSway(PLUS) platform; Advanced Medical Technology Inc, Watertown, MA) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included the short physical performance battery (SPPB) and serum 25(OH)D concentrations. An analysis of covariance model was used for treatment comparisons. Safety and tolerability were monitored. RESULTS: Serum 25(OH)D concentrations rose significantly (from 13.9 to 26.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) in patients treated with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) but not in patients treated with the placebo. After 16 wk, neither mediolateral sway nor SPPB differed significantly between treatment groups. However, in the post hoc analysis of patients subgrouped by baseline sway (> or = 0.46 compared with <0.46 cm), treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) significantly reduced sway compared with treatment with placebo (P = 0.047) in patients with elevated baseline sway but not in patients with normal baseline sway. Adverse experiences and incidences of hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and elevated creatinine were similar with both treatments. In patients treated with 8400 IU vitamin D(3), but not in placebo-treated patients, parathyroid hormone decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) raised 25(OH)D concentrations in elderly, vitamin D-insufficient individuals. Treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) did not reduce mediolateral sway significantly compared with treatment with placebo in this population, although in post hoc analysis, treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) reduced sway in the subgroup of patients who had elevated sway at baseline. Weekly treatment with 8400 IU vitamin D(3) was well tolerated. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00242476.

Treatment with alendronate plus calcium, alendronate alone, or calcium alone for postmenopausal low bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonates such as alendronate are widely used for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Supplemental calcium is also generally recommended. This trial directly compares alendronate to supplemental calcium and examines the effect of calcium supplementation on alendronate treatment. METHODS: This 2-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial enrolled healthy, postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD). Patients with a dietary calcium intake > or = 800 mg/day received daily vitamin D 400 IU and alendronate 10 mg/calcium-placebo, alendronate 10 mg/elemental calcium 1000 mg, or alendronate-placebo/calcium 1000 mg (2:2:1). Endpoints included BMD, bone turnover markers (BTMs), and adverse events. RESULTS: Randomized patients (N = 701) were an average of 20.4 years postmenopausal. After 24 months, increases in lumbar spine BMD differed significantly between patients receiving calcium alone (0.8%) and either alendronate alone (5.6%) or alendronate + calcium (6.0%) (p < 0.001). Significant differences were also seen at the trochanter and femoral neck (p < 0.001). BTMs were significantly lower with alendronate-containing treatments than calcium alone (p < 0.001). Addition of calcium supplementation to alendronate did not significantly increase BMD compared to alendronate alone (p = 0.29 to 0.97), but did result in a statistically significant, though small, additional reduction in urinary NTx. Adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Limitations include no assessment of vitamin D levels and a discontinuation rate of approximately 30%, although discontinuation rates were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with a daily intake of > or =800 mg calcium and 400 IU vitamin D, 24-month treatment with alendronate 10 mg daily with or without calcium 1000 mg resulted in significantly greater increases in BMD and reduction of bone turnover than supplemental calcium alone. Addition of supplemental calcium to alendronate treatment had no effect on BMD and resulted in a small, though statistically significant, additional reduction in NTx.

MDA-7 (interleukin-24) inhibits the proliferation of renal carcinoma cells and interacts with free radicals to promote cell death and loss of reproductive capacity.

The median survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is 12 months, and the majority of treatment options are palliative. MDA-7 (interleukin-24), when expressed via a recombinant replication defective adenovirus, Ad.mda-7, has profound antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects in a wide variety of tumor cells but not in nontransformed cells. The studies in this study examined the impact of MDA-7 on RCC proliferation and survival. RCC lines (A498 and UOK121N), but not primary renal epithelial cells, were resistant to adenoviral infection that correlated with a lack of coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor expression. Additional studies were performed using purified preparations of bacterially synthesized glutathione S-transferase (GST)-MDA-7 protein. GST-MDA-7, but not GST, caused a dose-dependent inhibition of RCC proliferation but not of primary renal epithelial cells. Clinically achievable concentrations of the novel therapeutic agent arsenic trioxide (0.5-1 micro M) were found to have little effect on RCC growth. However, the combination of GST-MDA-7 and arsenic trioxide resulted in a greater than additive reduction in cell growth that correlated with a large increase in tumor cell death. The free radical scavenger N-acetyl cysteine abolished the potentiating effect of arsenic trioxide. Although pro-caspase 3, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, and Bcl-(XL) levels, as well as nucleosomal DNA integrity, were reduced by combined treatment, cell killing was predominantly nonapoptotic. Combined treatment of RCC lines with GST-MDA-7 and arsenic trioxide also resulted in a substantial reduction in clonogenic survival compared with either treatment individually. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that MDA-7 protein, in combination with agents that generate free radicals, may have potential in the treatment of RCC.