Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pain ; 25(2): 497-507, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742905

RESUMEN

Development of back pain is multifactorial, and it is not well understood which factors are the main drivers of the disease. We therefore applied a machine-learning approach to an existing large cohort study data set and sought to identify and rank the most important contributors to the presence of back pain amongst the documented parameters of the cohort. Data from 399 participants in the KORA-MRI (Cooperative health research in the region Augsburg-magnetic resonance imaging) (Cooperative Health Research in the Region Augsburg) study was analyzed. The data set included MRI images of the whole body, including the spine, metabolic, sociodemographic, anthropometric, and cardiovascular data. The presence of back pain was one of the documented items in this data set. Applying a machine-learning approach to this preexisting data set, we sought to identify the variables that were most strongly associated with back pain. Mediation analysis was performed to evaluate the underlying mechanisms of the identified associations. We found that depression and anxiety were the 2 most selected predictors for back pain in our model. Additionally, body mass index, spinal canal width and disc generation, medium and heavy physical work as well as cardiovascular factors were among the top 10 most selected predictors. Using mediation analysis, we found that the effects of anxiety and depression on the presence of back pain were mainly direct effects that were not mediated by spinal imaging. In summary, we found that psychological factors were the most important predictors of back pain in our cohort. This supports the notion that back pain should be treated in a personalized multidimensional framework. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a wholistic approach to the problem of back pain. We found that depression and anxiety were the top predictors of back pain in our cohort. This strengthens the case for a multidimensional treatment approach to back pain, possibly with a special emphasis on psychological factors.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Depresión/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Ansiedad/diagnóstico por imagen , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Vértebras Lumbares/patología
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 38(26): 2993-3002, 2020 09 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32673171

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Despite undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with internal tandem duplication mutation in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3-ITD) have a poor prognosis, frequently relapse, and die as a result of AML. It is currently unknown whether a maintenance therapy using FLT3 inhibitors, such as the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, improves outcome after HCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II trial (SORMAIN; German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00000591), 83 adult patients with FLT3-ITD-positive AML in complete hematologic remission after HCT were randomly assigned to receive for 24 months either the multitargeted and FLT3-kinase inhibitor sorafenib (n = 43) or placebo (n = 40 placebo). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint of this trial. Relapse was defined as relapse or death, whatever occurred first. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the hazard ratio (HR) for relapse or death in the sorafenib group versus placebo group was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.85; log-rank P = .013). The 24-month RFS probability was 53.3% (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.68) with placebo versus 85.0% (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.93) with sorafenib (HR, 0.256; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.65; log-rank P = .002). Exploratory data show that patients with undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) before HCT and those with detectable MRD after HCT derive the strongest benefit from sorafenib. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib maintenance therapy reduces the risk of relapse and death after HCT for FLT3-ITD-positive AML.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Mutación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Secuencias Repetidas en Tándem , Tirosina Quinasa 3 Similar a fms/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Alemania , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/mortalidad , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/enzimología , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidad , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasia Residual , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Sorafenib/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA