Injectable therapies for localized fat loss: state of the art.

This review presents mechanisms of action and a review of the clinical applications of injections currently in development for localized fat reduction. After being received with initial enthusiasm earlier in the decade, mesotherapy and other injectable methods for fat loss (Lipodissolve, PC/DC, DC, injection lipolysis, adipolysis) have been subjects of critical scrutiny by the media and the US Food and Drug Administration. Several medications with novel detergent and lipolytic activity are in development and have demonstrated potential as minimally invasive fat reducing treatments.

Injectable treatments for adipose tissue: terminology, mechanism, and tissue interaction.

BACKGROUND: Just as injectable fillers have addressed the need for non-surgical methods to restore desired volume, a number of injectable therapies purpor to play a comparable role to reduce undesired volume. OBJECTIVE: To review published literature on the history, mechanism of action, and tissue interaction of injectable methods that aim to reduce localized collections of fat. RESULTS: Mesotherapy is an injection technique that has medical and cosmetic applications and is often confused with injectable fat loss therapies; injection lipolysis describes non-ablative fat reduction with agents (such as beta-agonists) that activate adipocyte lipolytic pathways; and adipolytic therapy using biologic detergents (such as deoxycholate) leads to permanent adipocyte ablation. None of these therapies have been cleared for use in fat reduction by any regulatory authority worldwide. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of action and tissue effects of injectable fat reducing compounds are diverse but are becoming increasingly understood.

Mesotherapy and phosphatidylcholine injections: historical clarification and review.

BACKGROUND: Mesotherapy was originally conceived in Europe as a method of utilizing cutaneous injections containing a mixture of compounds for the treatment of local medical and cosmetic conditions. Although mesotherapy was traditionally employed for pain relief, its cosmetic applications, particularly fat and cellulite removal, have recently received attention in the United States. Another treatment for localized fat reduction, which was popularized in Brazil and uses injections of phosphatidylcholine, has been erroneously considered synonymous with mesotherapy. Despite their attraction as purported "fat-dissolving" injections, the safety and efficacy of these novel cosmetic treatments remain ambiguous to most patients and physicians. OBJECTIVE: To distinguish mesotherapy from phosphatidylcholine injections by reviewing their history and the relevant experimental or clinical findings. METHODS: A comprehensive search of Medline indexed literature and conference proceedings. RESULTS: All the published studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of traditional mesotherapy currently originate from Europe. These reports focus primarily on musculoskeletal pain and vascular disease, rather than cosmetic applications. Although experimental data suggest that a number of traditional mesotherapy ingredients may theoretically reduce fat, these effects have not been supported in peer-reviewed studies. An increasing number of reports demonstrate that subcutaneous injections of a formula containing phosphatidylcholine combined with its emulsifier, deoxycholate, are effective in removing small collections of adipose tissue. Cell lysis, resulting from the detergent action of deoxycholate, may account for this clinical effect. CONCLUSIONS: Mesotherapy is distinct from a method of treating adipose tissue with subcutaneous injections of deoxycholate alone or in combination with phosphatidylcholine. Additional clinical and experimental studies are necessary to more definitively establish the safety and efficacy of these treatments.

Cellulite: Is there a role for injectables?

BACKGROUND: Cellulite describes the cutaneous dimpling of the thighs, buttocks, and hips that is seen predominately in women. Current evidence suggests that structural differences in fat architecture between the sexes account for its appearance. Mesotherapy, a method of delivering medication locally with the use of numerous cutaneous injections, has recently become a popular method to purportedly treat the condition. METHODS: An overview of cellulite and adipocyte physiology, with a literature review and appraisal of compounds commonly used in mesotherapy. RESULTS: Experimental studies using individual mesotherapy ingredients for other conditions suggest a number of mechanisms, including lipolysis, disrupting connective tissue and augmenting circulation, which may theoretically improve cellulite. Peer-reviewed studies have not evaluated whether these effects translate clinically. CONCLUSIONS: Until further studies are performed, patients considering mesotherapy for cellulite must be aware that the substances currently being injected to treat this cosmetically disturbing, but medically benign, condition have not been thoroughly evaluated for safety or efficacy.

The new age of acne therapy: light, lasers, and radiofrequency.

BACKGROUND: Current treatments for acne vulgaris include topical and oral medications that counteract microcomedone formation, sebum production, Propionibacterium acnes, and inflammation. Concerns about the short- and long-term consequences of these medications, along with technological advancements, have to significant progress in the management of acne. These developments include light, laser, and radio frequency, which may offer faster onset of action, equal or greater efficacy, and greater convenience than traditional approaches. CONCLUSION: Research emphasizing long-term follow-up and comparative, randomized trials is necessary to determine whether these emerging technologies will become a viable alternative to standard therapies such as antibiotics.