Prospective evaluation of transoral outlet reduction (TORe) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) failure.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Weight regain after RYGB is multifactorial including dilatation of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis. Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) procedure is a minimally invasive alternative to surgical anastomotic revision. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, simple blind, randomized study in patients with weight regain following RYGB, comparing the efficacy of conventional nutritional and behavioral management associated with a TORe procedure (TORe group) with conventional management alone and a Sham procedure (Sham group). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 12 months after endoscopy. RESULTS: From January 2015 to January 2019, 73 subjects were randomized in four French Bariatric centers. The final analysis involved 50 subjects, 25 in each group, 44 women, 6 men, with an average BMI of 40.6 kg/m2. At 12 months, the average %EWL was significantly higher in the TORe group than in the Sham group (13.5 ± 14.1 vs. - 0.77 ± 17.1; p = 0.002). Cohen's d was 0.91, indicating a large effect size of the procedure on the %EWL. There was no significant difference between groups concerning the improvement of obesity-related comorbidities (diabetes and dyslipidemia) and quality of life at 12 months. We report frequent adverse events in the TORe group (20% had adverse events related to the procedure). Three adverse events were serious, including two perforations of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis after TORe group that led to the premature termination of the study. CONCLUSIONS: After RYGBP failure linked to the dilatation of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis, TORe procedure with nutritional management results in significantly higher %EWL at 12 months compared to patients with nutritional management alone. As surgery, this minimally invasive endoscopic procedure can be associated with severe adverse events.

Management of the Zenker diverticulum: multicenter retrospective comparative study of open surgery and rigid endoscopy versus flexible endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Zenker's diverticulum is a rare disease that affects quality of life due to dysphagia and regurgitation. This condition can be treated by various surgical or endoscopic methods. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients treated for Zenker's diverticulum in three centers in the south of France between 2014 and 2019 were included. The primary objective was clinical efficacy. Secondary objectives were technical success, morbidities, recurrences, and need for a new procedure. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients with a total of one hundred sixty-five procedures performed were included. A significant difference was found between the different groups in terms of clinical success (97% for open surgery versus 79% for rigid endoscopy versus 90% for flexible endoscopy, p = 0.009). Technical failure occurred more frequently in the rigid endoscopy group than in the flexible endoscopy and surgical groups (p = 0.014). Median procedure duration, median time to resumption of feeding, and hospital discharge were statistically shorter for endoscopies than for open surgery. On the other hand, more recurrences occurred in patients treated by endoscopy than those treated by surgery, and more reinterventions were required. CONCLUSION: Flexible endoscopy appears to be as effective and safe as open surgery in the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Endoscopy allows a shorter hospital stay at the expense of a higher risk of recurrence of symptoms. It could be used as an alternative to open surgery for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum, especially in frail patients.