Direct oral anticoagulants: an alternative treatment for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome?

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrate a lower risk-benefit ratio than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for secondary thromboprophylaxis of thrombotic events. But there are no data on the efficacy of DOACs for the prevention of thrombotic recurrence in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of DOACs to prevent recurrences of thrombotic events in patients with APS. Methods This was a single-center pilot, using a multi-step Fleming design. If seven or fewer patients presented treatment failure with rivaroxaban, the study could conclude efficacy. Results A total of 23 patients were included. APS involved the veins only ( n = 19), arteries only ( n = 2) or both ( n = 1) and 1 patient exhibited catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS). Overall, two patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant, anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies and anticardiolipid antibodies (triple positivity). The mean duration of follow up was 35.6 (range, 29-40) months. A total of six treatment failures were reported: one patient, with triple positivity, developed bilateral distal pulmonary embolism (PE) after 20 months of treatment with rivaroxaban, two patients refused to take rivaroxaban, the treatment was stopped in three other patients: two with adverse effects and one with chronic iron-deficiency anemia. Conclusions Rivaroxaban may represent an alternative for secondary thromboprophylaxis for thrombo-embolism in patients with APS, in particular, those with poor international normalized ratio (INR) control and those who are not at the highest risk of recurrent thrombosis, such as those with triple positivity.

[Antenatal management for patients with increased risk of post-partum hemorrhage (excluding abnormal placentation)]. / Prise en charge anténatale des patientes à risque d'hémorragie du post-partum (hors anomalies de l'insertion placentaire).

OBJECTIVES: To describe management and screening for high-risk patients concerning post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) and antenatal management for severe anemia, thrombopenia, bleeding disorders and anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: Bibliographic search restricted to French and English languages using Medline database and recommendations of medical societies. RESULTS: The appropriate place for delivery should be chosen after multidisciplinary concertation based on level of risk (especially past-history of severe PPH and bleeding disorder) and easy access to blood products (Professional Consensus). Prevention for severe anemia is mainly based on oral iron supplementation (grade B). Explorations are required in case of thrombopenia<100Giga/L (grade C). Patients with bleeding disorder require the assistance of a physician skilled in hemostasis for perinatal management (grade C). Preventive anticoagulant therapy has no impact on PPH risk and perimedullar analgesia is usually authorized 12hours after last injection (grade C). Curative anticoagulant therapy slightly increases PPH risk and perimedullar analgesia is authorized only after 24hours since last injection (Professional Consensus). CONCLUSION: Prenatal identification of high-risk patients concerning PPH implies multidisciplinary concertation to determine the most appropriate birthplace where technical and human resources are available.

Effect of daily versus twice weekly long-term iron supplementation on iron absorption and status in iron-deficient women: a stable isotope study.

OBJECTIVES: This work aims at studying the effect of daily versus twice weekly long-term Fe supplementation on Fe absorption and status in Fe-deficient women. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study design is a randomized controlled open study carried out in the Internal Medicine Department, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, France. Twenty-four young women participated in this study and were randomized into two groups: Group 1 received 50 mg Fe daily, and group 2 received 50 mg Fe twice weekly for 3 months. On day 10 (D10) and on day 90 (D90) of Fe supplementation, blood samples were obtained, and women received orally about 5 mg of 57Fe, and blood was sampled at different times over 24 h. The 57Fe absorption was evaluated by calculating the areas under the curves (AUC). Fe and oxidative stress status were also assessed. RESULTS: 57Fe absorption was similar in both groups on D10 but was greatly decreased in Group 1 and remained high in Group 2 on D90. Fe status was more improved in Group 1 than in Group 2. Oxidative stress status remained statistically unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that daily Fe supplementation is able to correct an Fe deficiency much more than twice weekly Fe supplementation in young women.