Post-operative re-irradiation with hyperthermia in locoregional breast cancer recurrence: Temperature matters.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of hyperthermia thermal dose (TD) on locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity in locoregional recurrent breast cancer patients treated with postoperative re-irradiation and hyperthermia. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 112 women with resected locoregional recurrent breast cancer treated in 2010-2017 with postoperative re-irradiation 8frx4Gy (n = 34) or 23frx2Gy (n = 78), combined with 4-5 weekly hyperthermia sessions guided by invasive thermometry, were subdivided into 'low' (n = 56) and 'high' TD (n = 56) groups by the best session with highest median cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (Best CEM43T50) < 7.2 min and ≥7.2 min, respectively. Actuarial LRC, OS and late toxicity incidence were analyzed. Backward multivariable Cox regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis were performed. RESULTS: TD subgroups showed no significant differences in patient/treatment characteristics. Median follow-up was 43 months (range 1-107 months). High vs. low TD was associated with LRC (p = 0.0013), but not with OS (p = 0.29) or late toxicity (p = 0.58). Three-year LRC was 74.0% vs. 92.3% in the low and high TD group, respectively (p = 0.008). After three years, 25.0% and 0.9% of the patients had late toxicity grade 3 and 4, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that distant metastasis (HR 17.6; 95%CI 5.2-60.2), lymph node involvement (HR 2.9; 95%CI 1.2-7.2), recurrence site (chest wall vs. breast; HR 4.6; 95%CI 1.8-11.6) and TD (low vs. high; HR 4.1; 95%CI 1.4-11.5) were associated with LRC. TD was associated with LRC in IPW analysis (p = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: High thermal dose (best CEM43T50 ≥ 7.2 min) was associated with significantly higher LRC for patients with locoregional recurrent breast cancer treated with postoperative re-irradiation and hyperthermia, without augmenting toxicity.

Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients with cT3 Breast Cancer with Good Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Results in Excellent Local Control: A Comprehensive Cancer Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Many cT3 breast cancer patients are treated with mastectomy, regardless of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). We evaluated local control of cT3 patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation post-NST. In addition, we analyzed predictive characteristics for positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: All cT3 breast cancer patients who underwent BCS after NST between 2002 and 2015 at the Netherlands Cancer Institute were included. Local recurrence-free interval (LRFI) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors for positive margins were analyzed using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 114 patients undergoing BCS post-NST, 75 had negative margins, 16 had focally positive margins, and 23 had positive margins. Of those with (focally) positive margins, 12 underwent radiotherapy, 6 underwent re-excision, and 21 underwent mastectomy. Finally, 93/114 patients were treated with BCT (82%), with an LRFI of 95.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.5-100%) after a median follow-up of 7 years. Predictors for positive margins in univariable analysis were hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) subtype, lobular carcinoma, and non-mass enhancement (NME) on pre-NST MRI. MRI response was not correlated to positive margins. In multivariable regression, the odds of positive margins were decreased in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+; odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.73; p = 0.01) and TN tumors (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.82; p = 0.028). A trend toward positive margins was observed in patients with NME (OR 2.38, 95% CI 0.98-5.77; p = 0.055). CONCLUSION: BCT could be performed in 82% of cT3 patients in whom BCT appeared feasible on post-NST MRI. Local control in these patients was excellent. In those patients with HR+/HER2- tumors, NME on MRI, or invasive lobular carcinoma, the risk of positive margins should be considered preoperatively.

Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a Large, Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Survivors.

PURPOSE: To conduct a large, population-based study on cardiovascular disease (CVD) in breast cancer (BC) survivors treated in 1989 or later. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A large, population-based cohort comprising 70,230 surgically treated stage I to III BC patients diagnosed before age 75 years between 1989 and 2005 was linked with population-based registries for CVD. Cardiovascular disease risks were compared with the general population, and within the cohort using competing risk analyses. RESULTS: Compared with the general Dutch population, BC patients had a slightly lower CVD mortality risk (standardized mortality ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.97). Only death due to valvular heart disease was more frequent (standardized mortality ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.52). Left-sided radiation therapy after mastectomy increased the risk of any cardiovascular event compared with both surgery alone (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.36) and right-sided radiation therapy (sHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.36). Radiation-associated risks were found for not only ischemic heart disease, but also for valvular heart disease and congestive heart failure (CHF). Risks were more pronounced in patients aged <50 years at BC diagnosis (sHR 1.48, 95% CI 1.07-2.04 for left- vs right-sided radiation therapy after mastectomy). Left- versus right-sided radiation therapy after wide local excision did not increase the risk of all CVD combined, yet an increased ischemic heart disease risk was found (sHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28). Analyses including detailed radiation therapy information showed an increased CVD risk for left-sided chest wall irradiation alone, left-sided breast irradiation alone, and internal mammary chain field irradiation, all compared with right-sided breast irradiation alone. Compared with patients not treated with chemotherapy, chemotherapy used ≥1997 (ie, anthracyline-based chemotherapy) increased the risk of CHF (sHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.00-1.83). CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy regimens used in BC treatment between 1989 and 2005 increased the risk of CVD, and anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens increased the risk of CHF.

Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients: the MARI procedure.

OBJECTIVE: The MARI procedure [marking the axillary lymph node with radioactive iodine (I) seeds] is a new minimal invasive method to assess the pathological response of nodal metastases after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) in patients with breast cancer. This method allows axilla-conserving surgery in patients responding well to NST. METHODS: Prior to NST, proven tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes were marked with a I seed. This marked lymph node is the so-called MARI-node. After NST, the MARI node was selectively removed using a γ-detection probe. A complementary axillary lymph node dissection was performed in all patients to assess whether pathological response in the MARI node was indicative for the pathological response in the additional lymph nodes. RESULTS: A tumor-positive axillary lymph node was marked with a I seed in 100 patients. The MARI node was successfully identified in 97 of these 100 patients (identification rate 97%). Two patients did not undergo subsequent axillary lymph node dissection, leaving 95 patients for further analysis. The MARI node contained residual tumor cells in 65 of these 95 patients. In the other 30 patients, the MARI node was free of tumor, but additional positive lymph nodes were found in 5 patients. Thus, the MARI procedure correctly identified 65 of 70 patients with residual axillary tumor activity (false negative rate 5/70 = 7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that marking and selectively removing metastatic lymph nodes after neoadjuvant systemic treatment has a high identification rate and a low false negative rate. The tumor response in the marked lymph node may be used to tailor further axillary treatment after NST.

Guiding breast-conserving surgery in patients after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: a comparison of radioactive seed localization with the ROLL technique.

BACKGROUND: Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) with technetium-99 m colloid (ROLL-(99m)Tc) is commonly used to perform breast-conserving surgery in patients with nonpalpable breast tumors. Radioactive seed localization is a relatively new technique that localizes the tumor with a radioactive iodine-125 ((125)I) seed. The feasibility and outcome of these techniques after neoadjuvant systemic treatment has not been widely investigated. METHODS: All patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment between 2007 and 2010 in the Netherlands Cancer Institute who underwent breast-conserving surgery with the ROLL-(99m)Tc technique (n = 83) or with (125)I seed localization (n = 71) were analyzed. The weight of the resected specimen, the margins, and the percentage of patients requiring a second surgical intervention as a result of positive margins were assessed. RESULTS: Patient and tumor characteristics and systemic treatment regimens were comparable between both groups. The median weight of the resected specimen (53 vs. 48 g), the median smallest margin (3.5 vs. 3.0 mm), and the risk for additional surgery for incomplete resections (7 vs. 8 %) did not differ significantly between patients treated with the ROLL-(99m)Tc technique and (125)I seed localization. CONCLUSIONS: The ROLL-(99m)Tc technique and (125)I seed localization demonstrate comparable results when used to perform breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Because (125)I seed localization does not require additional radiological localization shortly before surgery, it simplifies surgery scheduling. Therefore, we prefer (125)I seed localization to perform breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic treatment.

Elective re-irradiation and hyperthermia following resection of persistent locoregional recurrent breast cancer: A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To analyse the therapeutic effect and toxicity of re-irradiation (re-RT) combined with hyperthermia (HT) following resection or clinically complete remission (CR) of persistent locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1988 and 2001, 78 patients with high risk recurrent breast cancer underwent elective re-RT and HT. All patients received extensive previous treatments, including surgery and high-dose irradiation (> or =50Gy). Most had received one or more lines of systemic therapy; 44% had been treated for > or = one previous locoregional recurrences. At start of re-RT + HT there was no macroscopically detectable tumour following surgery (96%) or chemotherapy (CT). Re-RT typically consisted of eight fractions of 4Gy, given twice weekly. Hyperthermia was added once a week. RESULTS: After a median follow up of 64.2 months, three-year survival was 66%. Three- and five-year local control rates were 78% and 65%. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 32% of patients. The risk of late > or = grade 3 toxicity was 40% after three years. Time interval to the current recurrence was found to be most predictive for local control in univariate and multivariate analysis. The extensiveness of current surgery was the most relevant treatment related factor associated with toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: For patients experiencing local recurrence in a previously radiated area, re-irradiation plus hyperthermia following minimisation of tumour burden leads to a high rate of local control, albeit with significant toxicity. The latter might be reduced by a more fractionated re-RT schedule.

Effects of lycopene on the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system in premenopausal breast cancer survivors and women at high familial breast cancer risk.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is an important growth factor associated with increased risk of premenopausal breast cancer. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial to evaluate whether tomato-derived lycopene supplementation (30 mg/day for 2 mo) decreases serum levels of total IGF-I in premenopausal women with 1) a history of breast cancer (n=24) or 2) a high familial breast cancer risk (n=36). Also, IGF binding protein (IGFBP) increasing effects were evaluated. Lycopene supplementation did not significantly alter serum total IGF-I and other IGF system components in the 2 study populations combined. However, statistically significant discordant results were observed between the 2 study populations (i.e., P<0.05 for total IGF-I, free IGF-I, and IGFBP-3). Total IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were increased in the breast cancer survivor population [total IGF-I=7.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI)= -0.2 to 14.3%; IGFBP-3=3.3%, 95% CI=0.7-6.0%), and free IGF-I was decreased in the family history population (-7.6%, 95% CI= -14.6 to -0.6%). This randomized controlled trial shows that 2 mo of lycopene supplementation has no effect on serum total IGF-I in the overall study population. However, lycopene effects were discordant between the 2 study populations showing beneficial effects in high-risk healthy women but not in breast cancer survivors.

Implementation of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: This population-based study describes the implementation of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands. We examined the extent of use over time of SNB in women who were considered eligible for SNB on the basis of their clinical status. METHODS: The study included a total of 35,465 breast cancer patients who were diagnosed with T1-2 tumours (5.0 cm), negative axillary lymph node status and no distant metastases upon clinical examination between 1st January 1998 and 31st December 2003 in six Comprehensive Cancer Centre regions in the Netherlands. Information on axillary surgery was classified as SNB alone, SNB+axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), ALND alone or none. Patterns of use of axillary surgery were summarised as the proportion of patients receiving each surgery type. RESULTS: Overall, 25.7% of patients underwent SNB alone, 19.1% underwent SNB+ALND, 50.0% had ALND alone and 5.2% did not have axillary surgery. SNB was more common in women who had breast-conserving surgery: 50.5% of patients who received breast-conserving surgery underwent SNB compared to 40.7% of patients who had mastectomy (p<0.0001). Amongst patients receiving breast-conserving treatment, 31.7% had SNB as final axillary surgery, whilst 20.5% of patients who had mastectomy had SNB alone (p<0.0001). The proportion of women who underwent a SNB alone or in combination with ALND increased over the period 1998-2003, from 2.1% to 45.8% and from 6.7% to 24.8%, respectively. There were marked differences in the patterns of dissemination of the use of SNB between regions: by 2003, the difference between the regions with the highest and lowest proportion of use was 25%. CONCLUSIONS: SNB has become the standard-of-care for the treatment of breast cancer patients clinically diagnosed with T1-2 tumours, clinically negative lymph nodes and without distant metastases. In 2003, 70.6% of patients with early breast cancer in the Netherlands received SNB, and within this group, 64.9% of patients had SNB as the final axillary treatment. Implementation of SNB may depend on factors associated with regional organisation of care.

Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients.

The aim of this study was to identify patients prior to breast-conserving therapy (BCT) who have complementary value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over conventional imaging in the assessment of tumor extent. All patients were eligible for BCT according to conventional imaging, and underwent preoperative MRI as part of this study. One hundred and sixty-five patients (166 tumors) were included. MRI was defined to have complementary value if conventional imaging underestimated or overestimated tumor extent (by more than 10 mm compared to histology) and MRI assessed the extent accurately. Logistic regression was employed to identify characteristics that are predictive of the complementary value of preoperative MRI. MRI had complementary value in 39 cases (23%). Patients <58 years old with irregular lesion margins at mammography and discrepancy in tumor extent by more than 10 mm between mammography and ultrasonography had a 3.2x higher chance of accurate assessment at MRI (positive predictive value 50%, negative predictive value 84%, p=0.0002). Preoperative MRI in patients eligible for BCT is more accurate than conventional imaging in the assessment of tumor extent in approximately one out of four patients. Subgroups of patients in whom MRI has complementary value may be defined by the differences in clinical and imaging features.